{"id":12754,"date":"2019-12-21T22:02:30","date_gmt":"2019-12-21T14:02:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/starliner-targets-early-landing-in-new-mexico\/"},"modified":"2019-12-21T22:02:30","modified_gmt":"2019-12-21T14:02:30","slug":"starliner-targets-early-landing-in-new-mexico","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/starliner-targets-early-landing-in-new-mexico\/","title":{"rendered":"Starliner targets early landing in New Mexico"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_42505\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-42505\" style=\"width: 1200px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-42505\" src=\"http:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/317188-33_CST_Flip_fr01_1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" srcset=\"https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/317188-33_CST_Flip_fr01_1.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/317188-33_CST_Flip_fr01_1-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/317188-33_CST_Flip_fr01_1-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/317188-33_CST_Flip_fr01_1-678x381.jpg 678w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-42505\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Artist\u2019s illustration of Boeing\u2019s Starliner spacecraft in orbit. Credit: Boeing<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>A day after a timing error caused it to enter the wrong orbit and miss its objective of meeting up with the International Space Station, Boeing\u2019s unpiloted Starliner crew capsule prepared for its next major test Sunday, when it will plunge back into the atmosphere and target a predawn landing at White Sands Space Harbor in New Mexico.<\/p>\n<p>The commercial crew capsule, flying on its first space mission, is scheduled to land under parachutes in a remote corner of the U.S. Army\u2019s White Sands Missile Range in southern New Mexico at 7:57 a.m. EST (5:57 a.m. MST; 1257 GMT) Sunday.<\/p>\n<p>Approaching from the southwest, the 15-foot-wide (nearly 4.6-meter) spacecraft will deploy three main parachutes, jettison its head shield and inflate airbags to cushion its landing in the New Mexican desert.<\/p>\n<p>A backup landing opportunity is available at White Sands at 3:48 p.m. EST (1:48 p.m. MST; 2048 GMT) Sunday.<\/p>\n<p>The Starliner\u2019s return to Earth Sunday will cut short a planned eight-day mission that was to dock with the space station. But a mission elapsed timer on the capsule errantly led the spaceship to believe it was in a different phase of its mission the moment it separated from its launcher following an otherwise successful ascent from Cape Canaveral early Friday.<\/p>\n<p>The error caused the spacecraft to burn too much propellant to reach the space station, and ground teams had to manually send commands for the ship to boost itself into a safe, but unplanned orbit. Mission was only able to uplink the command after a brief communications outage with NASA\u2019s TDRS tracking and data relay satellite network, a compounding problem officials said was likely caused by the Starliner being in the wrong orientation due to the timing problem.<\/p>\n<p>Jim Chilton,&nbsp;senior vice president of Boeing\u2019s space and launch division, said Saturday that a preliminary investigation has traced origin of the timing glitch to an error before the Starliner even lifted off Friday from Cape Canaveral atop its United Launch Alliance Atlas 5 rocket.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOur spacecraft needs to reach down into the Atlas 5 and figure out what time it is, where the Atlas 5 is in its mission profile, and then we set the clock based on that,\u201d he said. \u201cSomehow we reached in there and grabbed the wrong (number). This doesn\u2019t look like an Atlas problem. This looks like we reached in and grabbed the wrong coefficient.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs a result of starting the clock at the wrong time, the spacecraft upon reaching space, she thought she was later in the mission, and, being autonomous, started to behave that way,\u201d Chilton said. \u201cAnd so it wasn\u2019t in the orbit we expected without the burn and it wasn\u2019t in the attitude expected and was, in fact, adjusting that attitude.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><iframe id=\"twitter-widget-0\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"0\" allowtransparency=\"true\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" class=\"\" style=\"position: static; visibility: visible; width: 0px; height: 0px; display: block; flex-grow: 1;\" title=\"X Post\" src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/embed\/Tweet.html?dnt=false&amp;embedId=twitter-widget-0&amp;features=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%3D%3D&amp;frame=false&amp;hideCard=false&amp;hideThread=false&amp;id=1208612283288629248&amp;lang=en&amp;origin=https%3A%2F%2Fspaceflightnow.com%2F2019%2F12%2F21%2Fstarliner-targets-early-landing-in-new-mexico%2F&amp;sessionId=fd5b1cf09d4732e0921f6347f658f4f130999539&amp;theme=light&amp;widgetsVersion=6a3ad42b224df%3A1778106238597&amp;width=550px\" data-tweet-id=\"1208612283288629248\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-twitter-extracted-i1782696850143547017=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Boeing has released this video recorded by a forward-facing camera on the Centaur upper stage of United Launch Alliance\u2019s Atlas 5 rocket, showing the Starliner capsule separating and firing thrusters soon after liftoff Friday. https:\/\/t.co\/ndulUVMR02 pic.twitter.com\/iQeqgAD4Wm<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Spaceflight Now (@SpaceflightNow) December 22, 2019<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>The frenetic thruster firings began almost as soon as the Starliner separated from the Atlas 5 rocket\u2019s Centaur upper stage, which intentionally flew on a flattened, suborbital trajectory designed to reduce g-force loads on astronaut crews during a launch abort scenario.<\/p>\n<p>The continuous burns caused the thrusters to get hot, and in one case, a set of thrusters depleted its propellant supply. Mission controllers say that is no problem for Sunday\u2019s re-entry, and ground teams could route propellant from a separate thruster manifold.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe mission elapsed timing error did absolutely result in a number of follow-on challenges,\u201d said NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine. The spacecraft thought it was in a position it was not in, so it was trying to get in the right position. So the engines were firing, the reaction control was trying to put the spacecraft in the right position.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd that resulted in some fo these engines exceeding their limitations, both from a temperature perspective and from a duty cycle (perspective),\u201d Bridenstine said. \u201cThe engines are only supposed to run a certain number of times in a certain amount of time, and those were exceeded. Had the mission elapsed timing been correct, none of that would have happened.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Chilton said that the Starliner control team are trying to put the spacecraft through as many tests as possible without flying to the space station, collecting data to help clear future Starliner missions to carry astronauts. For example, he said the spacecraft extended its docking mechanism Saturday to check the mechanical system that will link future Starliner vehicles with the space station.<\/p>\n<p>The ship\u2019s stellar navigation cameras have also been checked out in orbit for the first time, and the solar panel power generation system is working better than expected. The temperature and other parameters inside the Starliner\u2019s pressurized cabin also look OK, officials said.<\/p>\n<p>But some of the Starliner\u2019s planned maneuvers around the space station, culminating in an autonomous docking, will remain unproven after the spacecraft\u2019s first Orbital Flight Test.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNot all objectives are created equal,\u201d Chilton said. \u201cThe launch and entry, descent and landing are really big safety issues. So we\u2019ve got the first of the big ones (done), and we\u2019ve got a great proportion of the objectives for in-space (testing).\u201d<\/p>\n<p>One big demonstration remains Sunday with the Starliner\u2019s re-entry and landing at White Sands.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe entry, descent and landing is not for the faint of heart, and this vehicle has not entered,\u201d Chilton told reporters Saturday. \u201cWe have not gone from space into the atmosphere. We have tested all the functions that you need once you get into the atmosphere during our pad abort test, but make no mistake, we still have something to prove here on entry tomorrow. We think our team has done a fantastic job being ready for that.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Unlike previous U.S. crew capsules that splash down in the ocean, the Starliner will return to a landing on solid ground.<\/p>\n<p>While the Starliner will not complete its mission to dock with the space station, Boeing and NASA officials Saturday said that some of the capsule\u2019s rendezvous and navigation sensors were going through limited checkouts.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNot every test objective is weighted equally,\u201d said NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, echoing Chilton\u2019s earlier comments. \u201cThey\u2019re not all the same. Launch, of course, is a big one, and entry, descent and landing is another really big one. So tomorrow is a big day. We have to be on our \u2018A\u2019 game.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_42531\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-42531\" style=\"width: 900px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-42531\" src=\"http:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/starliner_landing_diagram.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"900\" height=\"542\" srcset=\"https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/starliner_landing_diagram.jpg 900w, https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/starliner_landing_diagram-300x181.jpg 300w, https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/starliner_landing_diagram-768x463.jpg 768w, https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/starliner_landing_diagram-678x408.jpg 678w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-42531\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Once it completes re-entry, Boeing\u2019s Starliner spacecraft will deploy a series of parachutes, jettison its base heat shield, and inflate airbags to soften its landing. Credit: Boeing<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>NASA and Boeing mission controllers at the Johnson Space Center in Houston are readying the spacecraft for its return.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNow&nbsp;we\u2019re going to embark on a really tough and challenging phase, executing the deorbit burn, having the service module do its disposal burn entering into the water, and then having the crew module execute the entry, fire its thrusters, and then going through the parachute deploy sequence, and then landing at the White Sands Space Harbor,\u201d said Steve Stich, deputy manager of NASA\u2019s commercial crew program and a former space shuttle flight director, described the Starliner\u2019s re-entry and landing as a \u201ctough and challenging\u201d phase of the mission.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s a system that we have to test,\u201d Stich said. \u201cThe only way to test it will be to do an entry.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Flying tail first in its 155-mile-high (250-kilometer) orbit, the Starliner will ignite its engines at 7:23 a.m. EST (5:23 a.m. MST; 1223 GMT) to slow its velocity by about 335 mph (150 meters per second), enough for Earth\u2019s gravity to pull the the ship\u2019s orbit into the atmosphere.<\/p>\n<p>The braking burn will last around 50 seconds, followed moments later by the jettison of the Starliner\u2019s service module, a disposable unit housing the ship\u2019s abort engines, solar panels, radiators and other equipment.<\/p>\n<p>The service module will burn up during re-entry over the Pacific Ocean, while the Starliner crew module \u2014 containing an instrumented test dummy nicknamed \u201cRosie\u201d \u2014 will orient itself using 12 control thrusters to point its blunt end forward to face a flow of super-heated air as it plunges into the atmosphere.<\/p>\n<p>Traveling at 25 times the speed of sound, the Starliner will encounter the first discernible traces of the atmosphere at 7:41 a.m. EST (5:41 a.m. MST; 1241 GMT). Temperatures outside the capsule will reach as hot as 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit (1,650 degrees Celsius).<\/p>\n<p>An ablative base heat shield, ceramic tiles and thermal blankets will protect the capsule as it heads for White Sands.<\/p>\n<p>The human-rated spaceship will fly over Mexico, passing just west of El Paso before triggering its parachute deployment sequence at an altitude of around 30,000 feet (9 kilometers).<\/p>\n<p>The Starliner will jettison its upper heat shield and deploy a pair of drogue parachutes. Then mortars will fire and pilot chutes will pull three main parachutes from their bags at 7:53 a.m. EST (5:53 a.m. MST; 1253 GMT). Less than a minute later, the capsule will release its bottom heat shield, allowing airbags to inflate at around 3,000 feet (900 meters).<\/p>\n<p>Touchdown is scheduled for 7:57 a.m. EST (5:57 a.m. MST; 1257 GMT), more than an hour before sunrise at White Sands Space Harbor.<\/p>\n<p>The Starliner\u2019s landing Sunday will the second time an orbiting crew-capable space vehicle has returned to Earth at White Sands. The shuttle Columbia returned to Earth and touched down on an unpaved landing strip at White Sands Space Harbor in March 1982 to conclude NASA\u2019s third space shuttle mission.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_42532\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-42532\" style=\"width: 1041px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-42532\" src=\"http:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/637173main_STS-3_Columbia_landing_full_full.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1041\" height=\"780\" srcset=\"https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/637173main_STS-3_Columbia_landing_full_full.jpg 1041w, https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/637173main_STS-3_Columbia_landing_full_full-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/637173main_STS-3_Columbia_landing_full_full-768x575.jpg 768w, https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/637173main_STS-3_Columbia_landing_full_full-678x509.jpg 678w, https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/637173main_STS-3_Columbia_landing_full_full-326x245.jpg 326w, https:\/\/spaceflightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/637173main_STS-3_Columbia_landing_full_full-80x60.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1041px) 100vw, 1041px\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-42532\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The shuttle Columbia landed at White Sands Space Harbor to end NASA\u2019s third space shuttle mission March 30, 1982. Credit: NASA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Boeing\u2019s recovery team was dispatched to White Sands early to prepare for the Starliner\u2019s landing.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019ll stay away from the vehicle, approximately 4 kilometers (2.5 miles) away from the intended center point of the landing,\u201d said Louis Atchison, Boeing\u2019s Starliner launch and recovery chief. \u201cUpon vehicle landing, my team will go across the&nbsp;desert, which has its own challenges in and of itself, and we\u2019ll approach the vehicle. We\u2019ll make sure that the&nbsp;vehicle is safe for folks to go near. We do have propulsion systems on the crew module and we want to make sure&nbsp;that we\u2019re in a good configuration to go open the hatch.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>On a piloted mission, the recovery team will help astronauts out of the capsule.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor Orbital Flight Test, obviously you won\u2019t have a crew there, but we\u2019ll be exercising the same&nbsp;pieces of that activity that we would from a crew standpoint, so that we can get that timing down just right so we\u2019ll be&nbsp;ready to go fly crew,\u201d Atchison said.<\/p>\n<p>Boeing plans to transport the capsule back to its Starliner factory and refurbishment facility at NASA\u2019s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, where technicians will ready it for a future mission with astronauts. A separate spacecraft is being assembled at Kennedy for the Starliner\u2019s first crewed test flight. Both vehicles are rated for up to 10 missions.<\/p>\n<p>NASA has commercial crew contracts with Boeing and SpaceX to transport astronauts between Earth and the space station. The Starliner is Boeing\u2019s commercial crew spacecraft.<\/p>\n<p>Since 2011, the U.S. space agency has purchased seats from Russia for astronauts to travel to the space station, spending more than $80 million per round-trip ticket in recent agreements with Russia\u2019s space agency.<\/p>\n<p>New commercial crew ships developed by Boeing and SpaceX are intended to end U.S. reliance on Russian Soyuz capsules for human transportation to the station. NASA signed contracts with Boeing and SpaceX in 2014 \u2014 valued at $4.2 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively \u2014 to begin flying crews into space before the end of 2017.<\/p>\n<p>That schedule has been delayed more than two years. SpaceX accomplished a successful Crew Dragon test flight to the station in March, but the capsule was destroyed in an explosion during a ground test of its abort engines in April.<\/p>\n<p>After introducing a fix to the cause the explosion, SpaceX is gearing up for a high-altitude launch abort test in January, and says it can be ready to fly astronauts to station soon after that.<\/p>\n<p>NASA has not said whether it will require another unpiloted Starliner test flight after the problems that plagued the Orbital Flight Test, or whether agency official might press ahead with previous plans to fly astronauts Chris Ferguson, Mike Fincke and Nicole Mann on the next Starliner mission to the space station.<\/p>\n<p><b><i>Email the author.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Artist\u2019s illustration of Boeing\u2019s Starliner spacecraft in orbit. Credit: Boeing A day after a timing error caused it to enter the wrong orbit and miss its objective of meeting up with the International Space Station, Boeing\u2019s unpiloted Starliner crew capsule prepared for its next major test Sunday, when it will plunge back into the atmosphere [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[724,2181,670,524,291,1708,1565,2111],"class_list":["post-12754","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-atlas-5","tag-av-080","tag-boeing","tag-commercial-crew","tag-commercial-space","tag-complex-41","tag-cst-100","tag-cst-100-starliner-orbital-flight-test"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12754"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12754"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12754\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12754"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12754"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12754"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}