{"id":14474,"date":"2017-07-06T17:22:22","date_gmt":"2017-07-06T09:22:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/jaxa-nasa-approve-replacement-for-failed-hitomi-astronomy-satellite\/"},"modified":"2017-07-06T17:22:22","modified_gmt":"2017-07-06T09:22:22","slug":"jaxa-nasa-approve-replacement-for-failed-hitomi-astronomy-satellite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/jaxa-nasa-approve-replacement-for-failed-hitomi-astronomy-satellite\/","title":{"rendered":"JAXA, NASA approve replacement for failed Hitomi astronomy satellite"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"
Artist\u2019s concept of the failed Hitomi satellite. Credit: JAXA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The Japanese space agency is moving ahead with a smaller-scale X-ray astronomy satellite to replace the failed Hitomi observatory, which spun out of control about a month-and-a-half after its launch last year.<\/p>\n

The X-ray Astronomy Recovery Mission, or XARM, could launch as soon as March 2021, filling a potential gap in astronomers\u2019 X-ray vision of the universe, according to the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, or JAXA.<\/p>\n

NASA has agreed to a junior partner in XARM \u2014 pronounced \u201ccharm\u201d \u2014 and supply X-ray telescopes and a spectrometer instrument for the Japanese-led mission, according to Paul Hertz, directory of NASA\u2019s astrophysics division.<\/p>\n

The Japanese Diet approved spending on XARM for the Japanese government\u2019s current fiscal year, which started in April, and officials are in the final stages of formally kicking off development of the mission, Hertz said in a recent interview with Spaceflight Now.<\/p>\n

The Hitomi satellite failed in March 2016 after a series of attitude control problems caused the orbiting observatory to spin up and shed segments of its power-generating solar panels. Ground controllers lost contact with the satellite as it orbited more than 350 miles (575 kilometers) above Earth.<\/p>\n

Astronomers viewed the roughly $400 million mission as a stepping stone between current flagship-class X-ray telescopes, like NASA\u2019s Chandra X-ray Observatory and the European Space Agency\u2019s XMM-Newton, and an upgraded, more sensitive X-ray observatory called Athena due for launch in the late 2020s.<\/p>\n

Hertz said XARM will not have the observing range of Hitomi, which carried four scientific instruments sensitive to a range of X-ray wavelengths and gamma-rays, exposing astronomers to the workings of some of the most extreme events and environments in the cosmos, such as black holes, neutron stars and the creation of galaxies in the distant, ancient universe.<\/p>\n

XARM will instead carry replacements for Hitomi\u2019s two lower-energy instruments \u2014 the Soft X-ray Imager and the Soft X-ray Spectrometer. Both instruments contain critical parts provided by NASA, and the spectrometer is primarily a U.S.-developed payload.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe mission will not be a carbon copy (of Hitomi), but the NASA contribution will be a carbon copy,\u201d Hertz said in an interview. \u201cThe XARM mission is going to have only two of the four instruments that Hitomi had. It will have the Soft X-ray Spectrometer and the Soft X-ray Imager. The latter is a JAXA instrument, but we provided the telescope for both of those.\u201d<\/p>\n

XARM will not need an extendable 20-foot (6-meter) boom like Hitomi, Hertz said, because it will fly without the hard X-ray instruments that needed the deployable arm. Hard X-rays are at the higher-energy, shorter-wavelength end of the spectrum of X-ray light.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat makes it a simpler mission, so although our part will be built-to-print, there will obviously be some changes on the bus,\u201d Hertz said.<\/p>\n

The Soft X-ray Imager on XARM will also have improved resolution over the instrument on Hitomi, JAXA officials said.<\/p>\n

JAXA managers said NASA\u2019s NuSTAR telescope, which sees the universe in hard X-rays, could fill in for the missing high-energy instruments on XARM. The two observatories could conduct coordinated, tandem observations to help realize Hitomi\u2019s original science objectives.<\/p>\n

NASA will spend between $70 million and $90 million on its part of the XARM observatory, according to Hertz. Flight spares at NASA\u2019s Goddard Space Flight Center from the original Hitomi development will help save some money, he said.<\/p>\n

The European Space Agency is also a minor partner in Hitomi\u2019s replacement mission.<\/p>\n

A Japanese government document dated May 30 indicated JAXA would set up a project team and select a manufacturer for the XARM spacecraft within one year.<\/p>\n

Email the author.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Artist\u2019s concept of the failed Hitomi satellite. Credit: JAXA The Japanese space agency is moving ahead with a smaller-scale X-ray astronomy satellite to replace the failed Hitomi observatory, which spun out of control about a month-and-a-half after its launch last year. The X-ray Astronomy Recovery Mission, or XARM, could launch as soon as March 2021, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1690,1663,377,877,3250,3251],"class_list":["post-14474","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-astrophysics","tag-hitomi","tag-japan","tag-jaxa","tag-x-rays","tag-xarm"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14474"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14474"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14474\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14474"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14474"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}