{"id":17951,"date":"2019-09-04T01:15:51","date_gmt":"2019-09-03T17:15:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/spacex-reports-a-bug-in-its-alert-system-after-esa-shifts-spacecraft-to-avoid-starlink-satellite-collision\/"},"modified":"2019-09-04T01:15:51","modified_gmt":"2019-09-03T17:15:51","slug":"spacex-reports-a-bug-in-its-alert-system-after-esa-shifts-spacecraft-to-avoid-starlink-satellite-collision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/spacex-reports-a-bug-in-its-alert-system-after-esa-shifts-spacecraft-to-avoid-starlink-satellite-collision\/","title":{"rendered":"SpaceX reports a \u2018bug\u2019 in its alert system after ESA shifts spacecraft to avoid Starlink satellite collision"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_518900\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-518900\" style=\"width: 630px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full-width wp-image-518900\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.geekwire.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/190903-esa1-630x377.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"630\" height=\"377\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn.geekwire.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/190903-esa1-630x377.jpg 630w, https:\/\/cdn.geekwire.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/190903-esa1-768x459.jpg 768w, https:\/\/cdn.geekwire.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/190903-esa1-1260x753.jpg 1260w, https:\/\/cdn.geekwire.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/190903-esa1.jpg 1288w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 630px) 100vw, 630px\"><figcaption data-nosnippet=\"\" id=\"caption-attachment-518900\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A computer-generated diagram shows the projected orbital paths of SpaceX\u2019s Starlink satellite and the European Space Agency\u2019s Aeolus satellite. (ESA Graphic via Twitter)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The European Space Agency says it performed a collision avoidance maneuver over the Labor Day weekend to head off a potential crash between its Aeolus wind-measuring satellite and one of SpaceX\u2019s Starlink broadband data satellites.<\/p>\n<p>In a series of tweets, ESA said Monday\u2019s event marked the first such maneuver taken to avoid an active satellite in what\u2019s expected to become a \u201cmega constellation\u201d of thousands of satellites \u2014 and it warned that such maneuvers posed a grave challenge for future orbital traffic management.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs the number of satellites in orbit increases \u2026 today\u2019s \u2018manual\u2019 collision avoidance process will become impossible,\u201d ESA tweeted.<\/p>\n<p>The space agency said the maneuver was executed successfully about half an orbit before the close encounter.<\/p>\n<p>One point of controversy relates to how satellite operators respond to potentially shifting assessments of orbital collision risks. For example, should SpaceX have maneuvered its satellite, which was descending through Aeolus\u2019 altitude as part of a deorbit test?<\/p>\n<p>In a statement sent via email today, SpaceX acknowledged that it would have taken more action if it weren\u2019t for a \u201cbug\u201d in its on-call paging system:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cOur Starlink team last exchanged an email with the Aeolus operations team on August 28, when the probability of collision was only in the 2.2e-5 range (or 1 in 50k), well below the 1e-4 (or 1 in 10k) industry standard threshold and 75 times lower than the final estimate. At that point, both SpaceX and ESA determined a maneuver was not necessary.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThen, the U.S. Air Force\u2019s updates showed the probability increased to 1.69e-3 (or more than 1 in 10k) but a bug in our on-call paging system prevented the Starlink operator from seeing the follow-on correspondence on this probability increase \u2013 SpaceX is still investigating the issue and will implement corrective actions. However, had the Starlink operator seen the correspondence, we would have coordinated with ESA to determine best approach with their continuing with their maneuver or our performing a maneuver.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Starlink satellites are designed to make global broadband access from low Earth orbit available to millions or perhaps even billions of people who are currently underserved. The satellites are designed and manufactured at SpaceX\u2019s facility in Redmond, Wash.<\/p>\n<p>When the first batch of 60 operational satellites were set for launch in May, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk said the spacecraft would automatically upload the coordinates for other orbiting objects from an Air Force database and adjust their own orbits accordingly. No reference was made to that capability after Monday\u2019s event.<\/p>\n<p>Several of SpaceX\u2019s satellites failed to reach their intended 342-mile-high (550-kilometer-high) orbits, but the satellite at issue this week was apparently being used to test SpaceX\u2019s system for deorbiting spacecraft at the end of their useful life.<\/p>\n<p>In the process of lowering its altitude, the Starlink 44 spacecraft came into the vicinity of the Aeolus craft, which sticks to an altitude in the range of 200 miles (320 kilometers). ESA said its debris team determined that the safest option would be to increase Aeolus\u2019 altitude and pass over the Starlink satellite for the projected close encounter at 11:02 GMT (4:02 a.m. PT) Monday.<\/p>\n<p>Three thruster burns, ending less than an hour before the crucial time, were executed to increase Aeolus\u2019 altitude by about 350 meters (1,150 feet), ESA said in a blog posting. After the projected encounter, Aeolus \u201ccalled home as usual to send back its science data \u2013 proving the maneuver was successful and a collision was indeed avoided,\u201d the operations team tweeted.<\/p>\n<p>ESA said its satellite fleet performed 28 collision avoidance maneuvers during 2018, but most of those maneuvers were done to head off the risk of colliding with dead satellites or orbital debris. \u201cIt is very rare to perform collision avoidance maneuvers with active satellites,\u201d ESA\u2019s operation team said.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0\">\u201cThese avoidance maneuvers take a lot of time to prepare \u2013 from determining the future orbital positions of all functioning spacecraft, to calculating the risk of collision and potential outcomes of different actions,\u201d ESA said.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe title=\"Is There Space for 12,000 More Satellites Up There?\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/BMoH_zr2y8A?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen=\"\" data-ratio=\"0.5625\" data-width=\"800\" data-height=\"450\" style=\"display: block; margin: 0px; width: 800px; height: 450px;\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Authorities in Europe as well as the United States say the current system of space traffic management is likely to become overwhelmed if SpaceX and other ventures, including Amazon and OneWeb, execute their plans to put thousands of broadband data satellites into low Earth orbit over the next few years. That could raise the risk of cascading satellite collisions, with potentially catastrophic effects on global communication and navigation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo one was at fault here, but this example does show the urgent need for proper space traffic management, with clear communication protocols and more automation,\u201d Holger Krag, head of space safety at ESA, was quoted as saying in today\u2019s blog posting.<\/p>\n<p>Krag noted that \u201cin the absence of traffic rules and communication protocols, collision avoidance depends entirely on the pragmatism of the operators involved.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cToday, this negotiation is done through exchanging emails <span class=\"css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0\">\u2013<\/span> an archaic process that is no longer viable as increasing numbers of satellites in space mean more space traffic,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0\">ESA said it\u2019s preparing to use artificial intelligence to automate the traffic management process.<\/span><span class=\"css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0\"> \u201cFrom the initial assessment of a potential collision to a satellite moving out of the way, automated systems are becoming necessary to protect our space infrastructure,\u201d the agency said.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The issue is likely to come up at a ministerial council meeting in November, ESA said.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Commerce was tasked in April with developing a new system for managing space traffic and minimizing space junk. At last month\u2019s meeting of the National Space Council, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross reported that his department is \u201cactively pursuing\u201d such efforts, and is working to develop an Open Architecture Data Repository for space debris information.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A computer-generated diagram shows the projected orbital paths of SpaceX\u2019s Starlink satellite and the European Space Agency\u2019s Aeolus satellite. (ESA Graphic via Twitter) The European Space Agency says it performed a collision avoidance maneuver over the Labor Day weekend to head off a potential crash between its Aeolus wind-measuring satellite and one of SpaceX\u2019s Starlink [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[246,831,20,442,4180,316,440],"class_list":["post-17951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-esa","tag-european-space-agency","tag-satellite","tag-satellites","tag-space-junk","tag-spacex","tag-starlink"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17951"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17951\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}