{"id":25025,"date":"2021-04-16T00:16:22","date_gmt":"2021-04-15T16:16:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/vy-canis-majoris-mass-loss-history-sheds-light-on-hypergiants-state-connection-to-betelgeuse\/"},"modified":"2021-04-16T00:16:22","modified_gmt":"2021-04-15T16:16:22","slug":"vy-canis-majoris-mass-loss-history-sheds-light-on-hypergiants-state-connection-to-betelgeuse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/vy-canis-majoris-mass-loss-history-sheds-light-on-hypergiants-state-connection-to-betelgeuse\/","title":{"rendered":"VY Canis Majoris mass-loss history sheds light on hypergiant\u2019s state, connection to Betelgeuse"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the southern hemisphere, in the constellation Canis Major, lies a very young, very massive red hypergiant star called VY Canis Majoris (VY CMa).<\/p>\n<p>A pulsating variable, its apparent magnitude (how bright it appears in the night sky) varies unpredictably.&nbsp; It is located 1.2 kiloparsecs, or approximately 3,900 light years, from Earth, is only 8.2 million years old, and is one of the largest stars known to exist.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Approximately 1,420 times the radius of the Sun, it is 7-8 AU across (with 1 AU being 149.5 million kilometers \u2014 the average distance of Earth to the Sun).&nbsp; If VY CMa replaced the Sun in our solar system, the star\u2019s photosphere \u2014 or surface \u2014 would stretch nearly to Saturn\u2019s orbit.<\/p>\n<p>It is also one of the brightest stars known in the Milky Way galaxy, being 350,000 times more luminous than the Sun.&nbsp; Yet for the last 220+ years, we have not been able to see it with the naked eye since a dimming event in the late-1800s that the star has never visually recovered from.<\/p>\n<p>So why is this star fascinating?<\/p>\n<p>That largely comes down to the nature of its existence.&nbsp; Large stars like VY CMa have extremely short lifespans on the galactic timescale.&nbsp; At just 8.2 million years old, it will \u2014 with near certainty \u2014 explode in a supernova event within 100,000 years, with its remnant likely to form a black hole instead of a neutron star.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77230\" class=\"size-full wp-image-77230\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/VY2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"694\" height=\"680\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/VY2.jpg 694w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/VY2-350x343.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/VY2-357x350.jpg 357w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 694px) 100vw, 694px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-77230\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">VY Canis Majoris \u2013 seen by the Hubble Space Telescope \u2013 enshrouded in the nebulous gases and material it has ejected from itself over the last few thousand years. (Credit: NASA, ESA, HST, Humphreys et al.)<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think what really attracts astronomers to these very luminous and active stars, first of all, is their short lifetime,\u201d said Dr. Roberta Humphreys, in an interview with NASASpaceflight on her and her team\u2019s recently published paper, \u201cThe Mass-loss History of the Red Hypergiant VY CMa\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Rocket building kits<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Spaceflight history books<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Space Shuttle<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>The paper, published in the March 2021 issue of <i>The Astronomical Journal<\/i>, can be read here.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBelieve it or not, we observe changes in stars over a human lifetime.&nbsp; If you look at the history of VY Canis Majoris and its high mass-loss episodes, this is stuff occurring on the timescale of a human life.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>These high mass-loss events referenced by Dr. Humphreys form the crux of her and her team\u2019s recent work, which examined the knots, clumps, and extended arcs of ejecta material that surround VY CMa.<\/p>\n<p>By closely investigating these areas around the star, Humphreys et al. were able to correlate some of the ejecta plumes, clumps, and knots with dimming events recorded in the star\u2019s 320 year observational period dating back to 1801.<\/p>\n<p>According to the team\u2019s results, \u201cWe find probable correlations of two to three separate mass ejections or outflows with the 19th century episode and with the 1920-1940 period suggesting that each of the minima may be related to a separate outflow.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><iframe title=\"Zooming in on the red hypergiant star VY Canis Majoris\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/XU0iPq_7r_E?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen=\"\" name=\"fitvid0\" data-gtm-yt-inspected-14=\"true\" data-gtm-yt-inspected-21=\"true\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>To properly understand this result, we must go back through the observational history of VY CMa.<\/p>\n<p>The first (surviving) observation in 1801 gave the star an apparent magnitude just at or near +6.5 \u2014 barely (depending on atmospheric conditions) visible to the naked eye.&nbsp; This was calculated by eye, and photographic plates to confirm the apparent magnitude did not exist at the time.<\/p>\n<p>Other recorded observations from 1830 and a cluster around 1848-1850 returned similar +6.5 apparent magnitude observations \u2014 with even a few estimates closer to +6, indicating a potential, slight brightening of the star.<\/p>\n<p>(It\u2019s important to note this could be due to local atmospheric and telescopic conditions during observations.)<\/p>\n<p>A 20 year gap into the early 1870s then exists.&nbsp; But it\u2019s in the 1870s data that things really start to get interesting.&nbsp; Huge swings in apparent magnitude appear, rapid fluctuations from +6.5 down to +8 (too faint to be seen with the naked eye).<\/p>\n<p>These wide swings continued throughout the 1870s.&nbsp; But after each major dimming event, VY Canis Majoris returned more or less to an apparent magnitude of +6.5.<\/p>\n<p><iframe id=\"twitter-widget-1\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"0\" allowtransparency=\"true\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" class=\"\" style=\"position: static; visibility: visible; width: 0px; height: 0px; display: block; flex-grow: 1;\" title=\"X Post\" src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/embed\/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=NASASpaceflight&amp;dnt=true&amp;embedId=twitter-widget-1&amp;features=eyJ0ZndfdGltZWxpbmVfbGlzdCI6eyJidWNrZXQiOltdLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2ZvbGxvd2VyX2NvdW50X3N1bnNldCI6eyJidWNrZXQiOnRydWUsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfdHdlZXRfZWRpdF9iYWNrZW5kIjp7ImJ1Y2tldCI6Im9uIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH0sInRmd19yZWZzcmNfc2Vzc2lvbiI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJvbiIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfZm9zbnJfc29mdF9pbnRlcnZlbnRpb25zX2VuYWJsZWQiOnsiYnVja2V0Ijoib24iLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X21peGVkX21lZGlhXzE1ODk3Ijp7ImJ1Y2tldCI6InRyZWF0bWVudCIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X3Nob3dfYmlyZHdhdGNoX3Bpdm90c19lbmFibGVkIjp7ImJ1Y2tldCI6Im9uIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH0sInRmd19kdXBsaWNhdGVfc2NyaWJlc190b19zZXR0aW5ncyI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJvbiIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfdXNlX3Byb2ZpbGVfaW1hZ2Vfc2hhcGVfZW5hYmxlZCI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJvbiIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfdmlkZW9faGxzX2R5bmFtaWNfbWFuaWZlc3RzXzE1MDgyIjp7ImJ1Y2tldCI6InRydWVfYml0cmF0ZSIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfbGVnYWN5X3RpbWVsaW5lX3N1bnNldCI6eyJidWNrZXQiOnRydWUsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfdHdlZXRfZWRpdF9mcm9udGVuZCI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJvbiIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9fQ%3D%3D&amp;frame=false&amp;hideCard=false&amp;hideThread=false&amp;id=1367552932317720577&amp;lang=en&amp;origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nasaspaceflight.com%2F2021%2F04%2Fbig-star-mass-loss%2F&amp;sessionId=e8794c113cba4a7ae0156cf508ed08a69422a3e9&amp;siteScreenName=NASASpaceflight&amp;theme=light&amp;widgetsVersion=6a3ad42b224df%3A1778106238597&amp;width=550px\" data-gtm-yt-inspected-14=\"true\" data-gtm-yt-inspected-21=\"true\" data-tweet-id=\"1367552932317720577\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\" data-twitter-extracted-i1783497419455695467=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"><img decoding=\"async\" draggable=\"false\" role=\"img\" class=\"emoji\" alt=\"\u2714\ufe0f\" src=\"https:\/\/s.w.org\/images\/core\/emoji\/16.0.1\/svg\/2714.svg\"> MYSTERY SOLVED: Like red supergiant star Betelgeuse, astronomers sought to explain why red hypergiant VY Canis Majoris varied in brightness. We now understand why, thanks to @NASAHubble: https:\/\/t.co\/ND4wmdhm1T pic.twitter.com\/Q72zIj7F2V<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 NASA (@NASA) March 4, 2021<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Observations in the 1880s showed a potentially steady apparent magnitude of +7.3, but records are sparse.&nbsp; By the 1890s, near continuous observation of the star began.&nbsp; And two big things stand out in the data:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\">VY CMa never recovered in apparent magnitude from a event that\u2019s light signature would have reached Earth between 1880 and 1888 (but was apparently not directly observed at the time), and<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\">Since that 1880s event, the star has maintained a maximum apparent magnitude between +7.5 and +8 \u2014 recovering to this point after each major dimming event in the 1900s, with no deep minima events yet observed in the 2000s.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>So what has caused all these dimming events?&nbsp; What happened in the 1880s that caused the star to not recover as it has from every other dimming event?&nbsp; And don\u2019t these dimming and brightening events sound familiar in terms of Betelgeuse\u2019s dimming surprise of 2019\/2020?<\/p>\n<p>We shall return to the question of Betelgeuse later.<\/p>\n<p>But first, to understand the observed dimming events of VY Canis Majoris, we must look at the clumps, knots, and arcs of ejecta material at the heart of Humphreys et al.\u2019s recent work.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cImaging and spectroscopy of the knots, clumps, and extended arcs in the complex ejecta of VY CMa confirm a record of high mass-loss events over the past few hundred years,\u201d note Humphreys et al. in their paper.&nbsp; \u201cHubble Space Telescope\/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph spectroscopy of numerous small knots close to the star allow us to measure their radial velocities from the strong K I emission and determine their separate motions, spatial orientations, and time since ejecta.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTheir ages concentrate around 70, 120, 200, and 250 yr ago. \u2026 Comparison with VY CMa\u2019s historic light curve from 1800 to the present shows several knots with ejection times that correspond with extended periods of variability and deep minima.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77226\" class=\"size-full wp-image-77226\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Screen-Shot-2021-04-15-at-13.04.28.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"675\" height=\"876\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Screen-Shot-2021-04-15-at-13.04.28.png 675w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Screen-Shot-2021-04-15-at-13.04.28-270x350.png 270w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 675px) 100vw, 675px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-77226\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Credit: Humphreys et al.)<\/p>\n<p><em>(Photo caption: <\/em><em>The light curves with the probable ejection times for the different knots. Upper panel (a): the light curve for the 19th century (Robinson 1971). Middle panel (b): mid-20th century (Robinson 1970). Bottom panel (c): the most recent photometry from the AAVSO (American Association of Variable Star Observers))<\/em><\/p>\n<p>As seen in the above image, the inner knot, which is estimated to have been ejected from VY CMa 30-35 years ago (light time received at Earth) corresponds to the 1987 and 1992 dimming events.&nbsp; Likewise, the S knot B and W1 knot C\u2019s calculated ejection times overlap with each other and correspond to the 1870s dimming events (and are likely linked in terms of time of ejection to the major event from which VY CMa has not visually recovered in apparent magnitude).<\/p>\n<p>W1 knots A&amp;B and Clump C have calculated ejection times that correspond to the successive and deep minima events from the 1920s to the 1940s.<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s more, these clumps, knots, and ejecta plumes are massive themselves \u2014 some on the order of 10 times the average annual mass loss of VY Canis Majoris, which is calculated at the exceedingly high rate of 6\u00d710\u22124 M\u2609(solar masses) per year.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThese large ejections, one of these knots or clumps, is 10 times [the star\u2019s annual average loss].&nbsp; This is how it is doing it.&nbsp; For VY, you arrive at that [high] average annual mass-loss rate because of these massive events that occur.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As the ejection events begin, a large cloud of material is violently thrown from the star \u2014 blocking some of its light from reaching Earth.&nbsp; The greater the event in terms of material, the more significant the dimming event appears.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77232\" class=\"size-full wp-image-77232\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/VYCMa.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"985\" height=\"554\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/VYCMa.png 985w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/VYCMa-350x197.png 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/VYCMa-622x350.png 622w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/VYCMa-768x432.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 985px) 100vw, 985px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-77232\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Artist\u2019s impression of hypergiant star VY Canis Majoris with its vast convection cells and violent ejections. (Credit: NASA, ESA, Humphreys et al., &amp; J. Olmsted)<\/p>\n<p>The speed at which the material travels away from the star, calculated to be between 20-30 km\/s\u22121, causes the material to quickly move out of the direct line of sight to VY CMa \u2014 thus explaining why the star dims and then recovers to its previous apparent magnitude.<\/p>\n<p>So then what happened in the 1880s that caused the star to not recover as it has from every other dimming event?<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUnfortunately, I think given the incompleteness of the data of the 19th century, we can\u2019t really pin it down.&nbsp; Sometime between about 1880 and 1890, [VY CMa] had an outflow, an ejection that ended up more permanently obscuring the star,\u201d noted Dr. Humphreys.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMaybe this was an ejection that was more nearly in our line of sight, and it hasn\u2019t moved out of our line of sight yet and maybe it won\u2019t for quite some time.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As Humphreys et al. noted in their paper, \u201cThe most interesting period may be 1870-1880 and the post-1880 fading from which VY CMa has not recovered.&nbsp; S knot B and W1 knot C plus possibly the W2 knot have ejection ages that correspond to this period.&nbsp; Their different locations and orientations with respect to the star suggest that surface activity occurred over much of the star with separate outflows in different directions lasting at least 10 years.&nbsp; The major dimming of the star after 1880 by one or more magnitudes is very likely the origin of the present obscuration of the central star.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>So then how does this all relate to Betelgeuse?&nbsp; Much attention was given to the star from October 2019 to February 2020 when the usually reliable, semiregular variable star (which usually fluctuates in apparent magnitude from just +0 and +0.5 over predictable 425 day and 5.9 year cycles) suddenly, rapidly, and unexpectedly dimmed to a minimum of +1.614.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77233\" class=\"size-full wp-image-77233\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/betelgeuese.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1280\" height=\"640\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/betelgeuese.jpeg 1280w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/betelgeuese-350x175.jpeg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/betelgeuese-630x315.jpeg 630w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/betelgeuese-768x384.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/betelgeuese-1170x585.jpeg 1170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-77233\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Comparison image shows Betelgeuse before and after its unprecedented dimming. The observations were taken with the SPHERE instrument on ESO\u2019s Very Large Telescope in January and December 2019. (Credit: ESO)<\/p>\n<p>Images of the star at the time showed nearly its entire southern hemisphere significantly obscured.<\/p>\n<p>While rampant speculation of an impending&nbsp; supernova spread through popular culture, this is where Betelgeuse\u2019s similarities to VY Canis Majoris come into play.&nbsp; Both are short-lived red giants.&nbsp; Both are approximately 8.0-8.5 million years old (with that being Betelgeuse\u2019s predicted age while VY CMa has an estimated age of 8.2 million years).<\/p>\n<p>Thus, what is happening with VY Canis Majoris and its large-scale ejection events can shed light on what is happening with Betelgeuse.&nbsp; And in fact, a recent paper published by Dupre et al., focusing on the Betelgeuse dimming event, concluded that a major ejection event occurred on the star \u2014 obstructing much of the light from the star\u2019s southern hemisphere until it traveled out of our line of sight, causing an increase in brightness.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe outflows from VY, it\u2019s the same that we\u2019re saying with Betelgeuse,\u201d related Dr. Humphreys. \u201cBut with Betelgeuse, it\u2019s much more extreme and on a bigger scale.&nbsp; Question is: is Betelgeuse going to do it again?&nbsp; Is it now entering an active period for some reason?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>And this would make sense given that both Betelgeuse and VY Canis Majoris are predicted to go supernova within 100,000 years.&nbsp; While VY Canis Majoris is more active in its mass-loss events than Betelgeuse has now been observed to have gone through, this type of behavior from red hypergiants and red supergiants are common.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s quite possible this is a stage that the star goes through when it\u2019s, say, getting near the end of its life.&nbsp; We seem to have evidence that allows these massive stars of different types to have high mass-loss episodes that we think precede the terminal state,\u201d said Dr. Humphreys.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-77235\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Sun_and_VY_Canis_Majoris.svg\" alt=\"\">While VY Canis Majoris cannot be seen without telescopic aid, its proximity to Earth makes it a prime target for understanding the late-stage evolution of red hypergiants \u2014 and by extension similar red supergiant stars like Betelgeuse.<\/p>\n<p>Both stars are well known for various reasons, and both will provide spectacular end-of-life light shows on Earth when they go supernova.&nbsp; It\u2019s possible that what is being seen with VY Canis Majoris right now is the star proceeding through the final phase of its evolution before the terminal period begins.&nbsp; If so, it could provide clues on what to expect from Betelgeuse as it too races toward the end of its brief celestial existence.<\/p>\n<p>But these high mass-loss events from two nearby giants do not simply serve as end of life indicators or explanations for VY Canis Majoris and Betelgeuse\u2019s dimming events \u2014 they are life-giving eruptive forces to the universe as well.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat\u2019s important about them, even though they seem relatively rare, is that these are some of the main supergiants, massive stars, the main contributors of much of what we call the interstellar medium,\u201d said Dr. Humphreys.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThese stars are losing mass for most of their lives.&nbsp; Even before they go supernova, they\u2019re contributing to the interstellar medium.&nbsp; Depending on how much circulation they may have had in their interior up to the surface, they may also be contributing processed material from the interior\u2026 definitely would be contributing to helium, probably carbon.&nbsp; Depends on how close they are to the core collapse, how many of the heavier elements they might be contributing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>And those all form the building blocks for more complex solar systems that give rise to gas, ice, and terrestrial planets around long-lived, stable stars, with planets and moons that could well harbor life.<\/p>\n<p><em>(Lead image: VY Canis Majoris obscured by is nebular gasses and material (left); Betelgeuse during its dimming event in February 2020 (right). Credit: HST, NASA, ESA, ESO, Humphreys et al. Edited by Brady Kenniston)<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the southern hemisphere, in the constellation Canis Major, lies a very young, very massive red hypergiant star called VY Canis Majoris (VY CMa). A pulsating variable, its apparent magnitude (how bright it appears in the night sky) varies unpredictably.&nbsp; It is located 1.2 kiloparsecs, or approximately 3,900 light years, from Earth, is only 8.2 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1661,8692,8460,7942,5084,8693],"class_list":["post-25025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-astronomy","tag-betelgeuse","tag-red-giants","tag-stars","tag-supernova","tag-vy-canis-majoris"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25025"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25025"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25025\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}