{"id":37519,"date":"2020-07-06T19:00:10","date_gmt":"2020-07-06T11:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/second-sls-mobile-launcher-preps-for-construction-as-hardware-arrives-at-ksc\/"},"modified":"2020-07-06T19:00:10","modified_gmt":"2020-07-06T11:00:10","slug":"second-sls-mobile-launcher-preps-for-construction-as-hardware-arrives-at-ksc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/second-sls-mobile-launcher-preps-for-construction-as-hardware-arrives-at-ksc\/","title":{"rendered":"Second SLS Mobile Launcher preps for construction as hardware arrives at KSC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A second Mobile Launcher (ML-2) for NASA\u2019s Space Launch System (SLS) is heading into its construction phase as Ground Support Equipment begins to arrive at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC). NASA called for a second ML to be constructed to cater for the slightly taller Block 1B SLS that is set to come online in the middle of the decade.<\/p>\n<p>SLS already has a Mobile Launcher (ML-1), converted from its role with the defunct Ares-I rocket. Construction of that ML was initiated by a contracted award in 2008, with a total cost now estimated to be around $1 billion dollars USD.<\/p>\n<p>Now residing in the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) ahead of hosting the Artemis-1 SLS rocket, the first flight hardware to be stacked on its deck will be the Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) segments that recently arrived at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC).<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-68190\" class=\"size-full wp-image-68190\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/NSF-2020-07-06-18-58-23-020.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1154\" height=\"705\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/NSF-2020-07-06-18-58-23-020.jpg 1154w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/NSF-2020-07-06-18-58-23-020-350x214.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/NSF-2020-07-06-18-58-23-020-573x350.jpg 573w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/NSF-2020-07-06-18-58-23-020-180x110.jpg 180w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/NSF-2020-07-06-18-58-23-020-768x469.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1154px) 100vw, 1154px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-68190\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Artemis-1 booster segments ready for stacking \u2013 via Boeing<\/p>\n<p>Its role with SLS, however, was tied to one variant of the rocket, the Block 1 \u2013 which in turn is the interim version of NASA\u2019s new Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle.<\/p>\n<p>The plan has always been to swap the Block 1\u2019s Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS) with the more-capable Exploration Upper Stage (EUS), in turn moving to the SLS Block 1B variant. Initially, this was set to occur after two test flights \u2013 one uncrewed, one crewed \u2013 with the Block 1.<\/p>\n<p>The ICPS is a renamed and modified 5 meter Delta Cryogenic Second Stage that is currently used on Delta IV Heavy rockets and was previously used on the Delta IV M+ 5 meter upper stage configurations of the Delta IV family.<\/p>\n<p>The challenge faced by NASA\u2019s Exploration Ground Systems (EGS) Program revolved around catering for the Block 1B rocket, which is slightly taller than the Block 1, and thus incompatible with ML-1.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-56424\" class=\"wp-image-56424 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/Attach_3_-_ML_EM-2_Mod_Overview.ML-Modifications.Page-5.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1351\" height=\"960\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/Attach_3_-_ML_EM-2_Mod_Overview.ML-Modifications.Page-5.png 1351w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/Attach_3_-_ML_EM-2_Mod_Overview.ML-Modifications.Page-5-350x249.png 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/Attach_3_-_ML_EM-2_Mod_Overview.ML-Modifications.Page-5-493x350.png 493w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/Attach_3_-_ML_EM-2_Mod_Overview.ML-Modifications.Page-5-768x546.png 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/Attach_3_-_ML_EM-2_Mod_Overview.ML-Modifications.Page-5-1170x831.png 1170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1351px) 100vw, 1351px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-56424\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Side-by-side comparison from 2016 of the Block 1 vehicle and ML umbilical tower configuration (left) and the Block 1B configuration. Prior to funding ML-2, the single Mobile Launcher was going to be partially taken apart and rebuilt to go from the left configuration to the right. Subsequent design iterations for the Block 1B tower have changed the EUS umbilicals and added a Vertical Stabilizer Damper above. Credit: NASA<\/p>\n<p>An option to once again convert the current ML was ruled out due to the amount of time it would take and further impacts that would have on SLS\u2019s already lethargic launch cadence. As such, the decision was made to build another Mobile Launcher dedicated to the Block 1B rocket.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"widget-title penci-border-arrow\">See Also<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>SLS Forum Section<\/li>\n<li>L2 SLS Section<\/li>\n<li>Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>The second Mobile Launcher (ML-2) has a cost estimate of $450m. However, like ML-1, that cost is likely to rise over time based on the challenges involving ML-1, which ranged from being overweight to suffering from a slight lean. Both of these issues have since been resolved via engineering solutions.<\/p>\n<p>ML-1 will now be involved in more than just two launches due to NASA\u2019s decision to launch several Block 1 missions to allow for delays surrounding the EUS. This in turn has removed some schedule pressure on the readiness of ML-2.<\/p>\n<p>However, with ML-1 in the VAB, the construction site north of the assembly building has been freed to allow for the build-up of the huge structure to begin in earnest. Signs the \u201cconstruction phase\u201d have begun have been marked by the arrival of hardware that will make up the complex arrays of umbilical lines and Ground Support Equipment.<\/p>\n<p>Hardware that has arrived at KSC for ML-2 include the Vehicle Support Posts (VSPs). Each of SLS\u2019s two Solid Rocket Boosters require four VSPs, which act as the primary structural interfaces between the rocket and the ML. Each is 1.5 m (60 inches) tall with a base of 1.09 x 1.24 m (43 x 49 inches), made of cast steel with walls 10 cm (four inches) thick.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-68185\" class=\"wp-image-68185 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Z7.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1054\" height=\"458\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Z7.jpg 1054w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Z7-350x152.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Z7-630x274.jpg 630w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Z7-768x334.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1054px) 100vw, 1054px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-68185\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">VSPs for ML-2 arriving in the VAB \u2013 via NSF L2<\/p>\n<p>Precision Fabrication &amp; Cleaning \u2013 as prime contractor for building this hardware element \u2013 sent 10 VSPs, which includes two spares, to the VAB instrumentation shop for outfitting with strain gages and cabling.<\/p>\n<p>They will then head to the Launch Equipment Test Facility (LETF) where engineers will calibrate the instrumentation on each VSP, before they are stored in preparation for delivery for integration into the ML-2 base structure.<\/p>\n<p>Metal is also being cut on the Exploration Upper Stage Umbilical (EUSU), which is a major modification that caters for the Block 1B rocket\u2019s beefy upper stage.<\/p>\n<p>Modifying the ML-1 version of this umbilical for the EUS was ruled out via trade studies, which noted it would be more cost-effective to design and build a new umbilical from scratch.<\/p>\n<p>The new EUSU was an in-house design by NASA Engineering and is being fabricated by JP Donovan.&nbsp; It too will undergo testing at the LETF before being delivered for integration onto the ML-2 tower.<\/p>\n<p>As with ML-1, all of the ML-2 arms and umbilical will journey through the LETF, located just south of the Operations and Checkout (O&amp;C) Building at the famous spaceport. The area has a deep history, ranging back to the Shuttle era.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-68184\" class=\"wp-image-68184 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/NSF-2020-07-06-18-36-55-334.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1177\" height=\"753\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/NSF-2020-07-06-18-36-55-334.jpg 1177w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/NSF-2020-07-06-18-36-55-334-350x224.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/NSF-2020-07-06-18-36-55-334-547x350.jpg 547w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/NSF-2020-07-06-18-36-55-334-768x491.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/NSF-2020-07-06-18-36-55-334-1170x749.jpg 1170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1177px) 100vw, 1177px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-68184\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Part of the LETF during ML-1 testing \u2013 via NSF L2<\/p>\n<p>It was the testing site for launch-critical ground support systems and equipment, such as the Orbiter Access Arm (OAA), External Tank Gaseous Oxygen Vent Arm, External Tank vent line, Tail Service Masts and umbilical systems, and Solid Rocket Booster Hold Down Posts.<\/p>\n<p>It has also been involved with Cryo testing for the defunct X-33 technology demonstrator for the VentureStar program and had a role in testing Delta IV ECS umbilicals and Centaur Upper Stage rolling beam tests.<\/p>\n<p>The facility allows for simulated launch vehicle events such as movement from wind, ignition and liftoff, effects of solar heating and cryogenic shrinkage.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><iframe title=\"SLS ML-1 Rollback to the VAB Timelapse  - December, 2019\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/ZAEvxN5DYC4?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen=\"\" name=\"fitvid0\" data-gtm-yt-inspected-14=\"true\" data-gtm-yt-inspected-21=\"true\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>The fabrication, testing and installation of elements for ML-2 are all working towards a completion date for the huge structure in 2023, ready to support a schedule that allows for a potential \u2013 if unlikely \u2013 use of the Block 1B on the 2024 Artemis-3 mission.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A second Mobile Launcher (ML-2) for NASA\u2019s Space Launch System (SLS) is heading into its construction phase as Ground Support Equipment begins to arrive at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC). NASA called for a second ML to be constructed to cater for the slightly taller Block 1B SLS that is set to come online in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":37520,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[8075,8892,8032,624],"class_list":["post-37519","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-eus","tag-ml","tag-ml-2","tag-sls"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37519"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37519"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37519\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/37520"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37519"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37519"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37519"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}