{"id":38023,"date":"2019-05-29T22:12:02","date_gmt":"2019-05-29T14:12:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/nasa-briefly-updates-status-of-crew-dragon-anomaly-spacex-test-schedule\/"},"modified":"2019-05-29T22:12:02","modified_gmt":"2019-05-29T14:12:02","slug":"nasa-briefly-updates-status-of-crew-dragon-anomaly-spacex-test-schedule","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/nasa-briefly-updates-status-of-crew-dragon-anomaly-spacex-test-schedule\/","title":{"rendered":"NASA briefly updates status of Crew Dragon anomaly, SpaceX test schedule"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As part of a planned presentation to the NASA Advisory Council, NASA\u2019s Commercial Crew Program manager, Kathy Lueders, updated the advisory council on the status of the investigation for SpaceX\u2019s Crew Dragon anomaly that occurred in April. <\/p>\n<p>Ms. Lueders did not go into in-depth detail but did highlight SpaceX\u2019s daily communication with NASA, the \u201cgreat job\u201d done so far, and provided insight into changes that \u201cmight be\u201d needed to the Crew Dragon\u2019s SuperDraco system.<\/p>\n<p>More so, Ms. Lueders revealed the readiness dates for the new Crew Dragon capsules that will fly the In Flight Abort and Demo 2 crew test flights.\n<\/p>\n<p><b>Anomaly update and question of communication issues:<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Ms. Lueders began her overall update on all elements of the Commercial Crew Program to the NASA Advisory Council (NAC) by stating that \u201cI think sometimes people don\u2019t understand how much we are engaged and working with each of the providers as they\u2019re performing these final critical test and verification activities.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>To this end, Ms. Lueders spent a good deal of time emphasizing how involved NASA personnel have been from the very beginning of the investigation into the anomaly suffered by SpaceX\u2019s Crew Dragon during its planned SuperDraco static fire on 20 April.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-58466\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/L2-banner@2x.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"4500\" height=\"2532\">The issue of communication regarding the anomaly with the general public has been one raised since the very beginning, even with public statements from NASA and SpaceX on the day of and the initial days after the anomaly.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"widget-title penci-border-arrow\">See Also<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>SpaceX General Section<\/li>\n<li>SpaceX Missions Section<\/li>\n<li>L2 SpaceX Section<\/li>\n<li>Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>However, more than a month out, those questions and when information will be revealed to taxpayers is a more necessary question. &nbsp;And curiously, it\u2019s a question NASA does not appear to want to answer itself from a Public Affairs standpoint.<\/p>\n<p>Spaceflight news subscription<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Space tourism guides<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Spaceflight history books<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>Last Thursday during an Apollo 50th Anniversary event at the Kennedy Space Center, Center Director Bob Cabana and NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine were asked about the secrecy surrounding information on this anomaly and if taxpayers should be worried.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Cabana spent a little more than a minute praising SpaceX\u2019s communication with NASA and emphasizing that there has been no secrecy from NASA\u2019s contractor on this matter.<\/p>\n<p>What NASA Public Affairs then edited out of the publicly released video of that Question and Answer session was Administrator Bridenstine stepping in to admit that communication on this issue had been poor \u2013 though exactly which agency\u2019s communication he was referring to, NASA or SpaceX, was ambiguous.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><iframe title=\"Crew Demo-1 | Launch\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/2ZL0tbOZYhE?start=2925&amp;feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen=\"\" name=\"fitvid0\" data-gtm-yt-inspected-14=\"true\" data-gtm-yt-inspected-21=\"true\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>The irony of a government agency \u2013 which spends taxpayer money \u2013 editing out its own Administrator\u2019s comment that communication was poor underscores just what Mr. Bridenstine was saying about the agency he leads.<\/p>\n<p>All of this does raise the legitimate question of who should be the one disseminating information.&nbsp; On the one hand, NASA is the government agency that has spent taxpayer money on the Crew Dragon and Starliner systems by contracting with SpaceX and Boeing to build and provide these services.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, SpaceX and Boeing are the ones using that money; but they are \u2013 technically \u2013 NASA contractors with a sole obligation to provide all anomaly information to NASA, not the public.<\/p>\n<p>As seen last year with the Boeing anomaly and now this year with the SpaceX anomaly, NASA has an apparent unwillingness to communicate about these issues beyond the bare minimum when NASA is, in reality, the agency in charge of this initiative and the agency that has received all the information on the anomalies that occurred during taxpayer-funded initiatives.<\/p>\n<p>And this overall frustration with a narrative that SpaceX and Boeing are not communicating about their anomalies was present in Ms. Lueders\u2019 presentation to NAC, where she spent a good deal of time praising provider communication and driving home how much NASA has been involved from the very beginning with both providers.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-61555\" class=\"wp-image-61555 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/SpaceX-02-e1559158307155.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1790\" height=\"1051\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/SpaceX-02-e1559158307155.png 1790w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/SpaceX-02-e1559158307155-350x206.png 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/SpaceX-02-e1559158307155-596x350.png 596w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/SpaceX-02-e1559158307155-768x451.png 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/SpaceX-02-e1559158307155-1170x687.png 1170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1790px) 100vw, 1790px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-61555\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Commercial Crew Program slide of presentation to NAC on Tuesday, 28 May. (Credit: NASA)<\/p>\n<p>For SpaceX in particular, in addition to NASA personnel being in the control room during the SuperDraco static fire test, Ms. Lueders noted that NASA and SpaceX \u201cimmediately executed the mishap plans per the Agency-Company guidelines\u201d and that \u201cfrom day one as we worked through the early efforts that focused on getting the site cleaned up and collecting all the data and getting the anomaly timeline down, NASA has been helping out with different site inspection assets to help SpaceX make sure they\u2019re collecting all the data they can.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This led to an interesting series of statements from Ms. Lueders regarding the parts of Crew Dragon\u2019s propulsion system that \u201cmay need to be modified\u201d to prevent this kind of anomaly in the future. <\/p>\n<p>During this part of the presentation, Ms. Lueders repeatedly used the phrases \u201cmay need\u201d and \u201cmight\u201d to refer to potential changes in the SuperDraco propulsion system. <\/p>\n<p>This language is admittedly not common in the aftermath of anomalies of this kind that have historically in the U.S. human spaceflight arena always led to some kind of significant change to the vehicle. <\/p>\n<p>To this end, Ms. Lueders\u2019 language could be read one of two ways: the first being that she was simply hedging her language as the investigation has not revealed the root cause of the anomaly at this time and therefore changes \u201cmight be\u201d coming via information revealed at a later date.<\/p>\n<p>The second option is that the investigation has revealed a specific cause for the anomaly and that the cause has been traced to something that occurred after Crew Dragon splashed down in the Atlantic Ocean after its mission.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-60549\" class=\"wp-image-60549 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/2019-03-08-134250.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1121\" height=\"745\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/2019-03-08-134250.jpg 1121w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/2019-03-08-134250-350x233.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/2019-03-08-134250-527x350.jpg 527w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/2019-03-08-134250-768x510.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/2019-03-08-134250-585x390.jpg 585w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/2019-03-08-134250-263x175.jpg 263w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1121px) 100vw, 1121px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-60549\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Dragon 2 returning home under chutes. [Credit: NASA TV]<\/p>\n<p>If the second option is where the investigation is currently pointing, it would show that there is no issue with the SuperDraco system as designed for its purpose of pulling the SpaceX Dragon capsule safely away from a failing Falcon 9 in the event of a launch accident and that the anomaly\u2019s cause occurred during or after splashdown and after the SuperDraco system is needed.<\/p>\n<p>This second option would likely make the root cause issue a maintenance requirement following splashdown (hence Ms. Lueders\u2019 \u201cmay be\u201d and \u201cmight\u201d language) and that&nbsp;SpaceX and NASA could decide that no changes are needed to the SuperDraco system as SpaceX could <em>simply<\/em> swap out the SuperDracos on the Dragons before they are subsequently used for cargo runs to the Space Station after their initial crew flights. <\/p>\n<p>Still, in the early weeks of the investigation, Ms. Lueders emphasized that subsequent Dragons currently in production are being kept in a state that would enable access to the SuperDraco system to allow SpaceX to make modifications or changes if the investigation shows that to be necessary.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cRight now they are still making progress on the Demo-2 dates, but one of the key things is to make sure that we are understanding [the anomaly and that] we don\u2019t want to close out the parts of the vehicle that might need to be modified,\u201d noted Ms. Lueders.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think the team\u2019s been doing a really good job of making sure they are managing this build that allows for any upgrades to support the learning that\u2019s coming down from the anomaly investigation team.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><b>New dates for In Flight Abort and Demo-2:<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Even with the anomaly that occurred last month, Ms. Lueders was able to update the NAC directly on the current hardware readiness dates for the In Flight Abort test and the Demo-2 crew mission, both of which now have to use different Crew Dragon capsules than originally planned.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><iframe title=\"SpaceX Pad Abort Test\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/1_FXVjf46T8?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen=\"\" name=\"fitvid1\" data-gtm-yt-inspected-14=\"true\" data-gtm-yt-inspected-21=\"true\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>According to Ms. Lueders, SpaceX will have the Falcon 9 rocket and Crew Dragon capsule hardware ready for the In Flight Abort test by the end of July, just two months from now.<\/p>\n<p>Originally, the In Flight Abort test was to use the Demo-1 Crew Dragon that was destroyed in the anomaly in April. &nbsp;SpaceX will now use the Crew Dragon capsule originally planned for the Demo-2 crew flight for the In Flight Abort.<\/p>\n<p>Because SpaceX has multiple Crew Dragon capsules in flow for the Commercial Crew Program, and the Demo-2 capsule \u2013 as originally assigned \u2013 already carried a hardware readiness date of July 2019, it is no real surprise that SpaceX will be able to have that capsule \u201chardware ready\u201d for its new role as the In Flight Abort vehicle at the time previously stated (assuming no SuperDraco changes are needed).<\/p>\n<p>Another element aiding the schedule at this point is that \u201cSpaceX is optimizing hardware configuration for each spacecraft based on intended use for those test flights,\u201d noted NASA\u2019s PowerPoint presentation to the NAC.<\/p>\n<p>Even more insightful as to where the schedule stands at present came at the end of the SpaceX portion of the Commercial Crew briefing when Ms. Lueders was asked if SpaceX had a new target date for the Demo-2 crew mission \u2013 even if that date was notional at this point.<\/p>\n<p>Ms. Lueders acknowledged that because NASA activated so many Crew Dragon capsules two to three years ago, SpaceX has been able to adjust its schedule and pull certain capsules forward in their timeline without additional risk.<\/p>\n<p>Current capsule reassignments:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><b>Crew Dragon Capsule<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>Original Assignment<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>New Assignment<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SN 201<\/td>\n<td>Demo-1 &amp; In Flight Abort<\/td>\n<td>N\/A<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SN 205*<\/td>\n<td>Demo-2<\/td>\n<td>In Flight Abort<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SN 206<\/td>\n<td>Crew-1<\/td>\n<td>Demo-2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SN 207<\/td>\n<td>Crew-2<\/td>\n<td>Crew-1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>*Crew Dragon builds 202, 203, and 204 are test articles and not in flow for missions\/flights.<\/p>\n<p>This led to Ms. Lueders saying that while she is adamant that the anomaly investigation has to be allowed to proceed at its own pace and not be driven by schedule pressure, SpaceX has indicated that the newly assigned Demo-2 capsule and the previously allocated Falcon 9 rocket will be ready for launch from a hardware readiness perspective by the end of the year.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSpaceX is getting the vehicle ready by the end of the year,\u201d noted Ms. Lueders.&nbsp;&nbsp;\u201cBut we need to close out the anomaly investigation. &nbsp;That\u2019s the big thing.&nbsp; We need to really make sure we\u2019ve taken our learning from this anomaly investigation and that if we need to make changes to the vehicle, that it gets done.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-61557\" class=\"size-full wp-image-61557\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/SpaceX-03.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1920\" height=\"1080\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/SpaceX-03.png 1920w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/SpaceX-03-350x197.png 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/SpaceX-03-622x350.png 622w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/SpaceX-03-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/SpaceX-03-1170x658.png 1170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-61557\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Current status of the Dragon that will now fly the In Flight Abort test. [Credit: NASA]<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd then we obviously have to get through some more critical tests like the In Flight Abort. &nbsp;Getting that done is a big deal.&nbsp; And then we have parachute testing we have to finish up. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cRight now there is no non-critical test. &nbsp;All the tests are big.&nbsp; But SpaceX is pulling together and working to get that vehicle outfitted and ready to go and have the launch vehicle ready to go by the end of the year.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Thus, as currently presented, the SpaceX test schedule, from an earliest possible hardware readiness standpoint, is as follows:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><b>Test<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>Hardware Readiness Date<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>In Flight Abort<\/td>\n<td>July 2019<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Demo-2 Crew test flight<\/td>\n<td>End of year 2019<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As part of a planned presentation to the NASA Advisory Council, NASA\u2019s Commercial Crew Program manager, Kathy Lueders, updated the advisory council on the status of the investigation for SpaceX\u2019s Crew Dragon anomaly that occurred in April. Ms. Lueders did not go into in-depth detail but did highlight SpaceX\u2019s daily communication with NASA, the \u201cgreat [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2304,1926,316],"class_list":["post-38023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-crs","tag-dragon-2","tag-spacex"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38023"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38023"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38023\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}