{"id":38532,"date":"2018-02-27T18:37:09","date_gmt":"2018-02-27T10:37:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/soyuz-ms-06-returns-three-iss-crew-members-to-earth\/"},"modified":"2018-02-27T18:37:09","modified_gmt":"2018-02-27T10:37:09","slug":"soyuz-ms-06-returns-three-iss-crew-members-to-earth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/soyuz-ms-06-returns-three-iss-crew-members-to-earth\/","title":{"rendered":"Soyuz MS-06 returns three ISS crew members to Earth"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Expedition 54 Flight Engineers Mark Vande Hei and Joe Acaba of NASA and Commander Alexander Misurkin of Roscosmos have returned from the International Space Station (ISS) in their Soyuz MS-06 spacecraft. The trio landed on the steppes of Kazakhstan around 02:31 UTC.<\/p>\n<p>During their 168 days in space, they were part of the first expedition that began a long-term increase in the crew size on the U.S. segment from three people to four, enabling NASA to double the time dedicated to research \u2013 surpassing 100 hours of research in one week.<\/p>\n<p>The crew launched in September, riding on the Soyuz FG rocket.<\/p>\n<p>During the crew\u2019s tour, Misurkin was involved in a record-breaking Russian EVA.&nbsp;Also, a&nbsp;major EVA task on the US side also involved the two US astronauts as work over a series of spacewalkers was completed on improving the Station\u2019s robotic assets.<br \/>\n<img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-55157\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-230058.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1216\" height=\"685\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-230058.jpg 1216w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-230058-350x197.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-230058-621x350.jpg 621w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-230058-768x433.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-230058-1170x659.jpg 1170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1216px) 100vw, 1216px\"><\/p>\n<p>Once final farewells were complete, the hatches between the ISS and the Soyuz were closed, prior to the crew completing the translation from the Orbital Module (BO) and Descent Module (SA) to strap themselves into their Kazbek couches inside the SA.<\/p>\n<p>As per the timeline, Soyuz MS-06 undocked from the ISS at 23:08 UTC.<\/p>\n<p>At the time of undocking, Expedition 55 began aboard the station. Shkaplerov, NASA\u2019s Scott Tingle, and Norishige Kanai of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency will crew the station until three additional crew members arrive on March 23.<\/p>\n<p>Ricky Arnold and Drew Feustel of NASA and Oleg Artemyev of Roscosmos will launch from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan on March 21 for a two-day journey to join Expedition 55 on station.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"widget-title penci-border-arrow\">See Also<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>LIVE: Soyuz MS-06<\/li>\n<li>L2 Russian Section<\/li>\n<li>L2 ISS Section<\/li>\n<li>Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Following undocking, Soyuz enjoyed a few hours of free flight as it departed from the Station\u2019s neighborhood via two separation burns while the onboard crew prepared for the final aspect of their mission.<\/p>\n<p>Space Technology<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>NASA mission updates<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Space Shuttle<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>The deorbit burn occurred on schedule at 01:38 UTC, reducing the Soyuz\u2019s velocity just enough for it to begin the plunge back to Earth via a 4 min, 40 second retrograde firing.<\/p>\n<p>The Soyuz then entered the critical part of its mission&nbsp;as the spacecraft has no other option but to re-enter.<\/p>\n<p>The first milestone was module separation&nbsp;as the three major elements of the Soyuz spacecraft \u2013 the OM, DM and Instrumentation\/Propulsion Module (IPM) \u2013 are pushed apart via the use of pyrotechnics.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-55153\" class=\"wp-image-55153 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-200334.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"986\" height=\"691\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-200334.jpg 986w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-200334-350x245.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-200334-499x350.jpg 499w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-200334-768x538.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 986px) 100vw, 986px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-55153\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">One of the separation planes on the Soyuz spacecraft, via Shuttle era FRR documentation \u2013 L2<\/p>\n<p>All three modules nominally separate simultaneously \u2013 shortly after the deorbit burn was completed \u2013 at around 140 km altitude.<\/p>\n<p>Two \u201coff nominal\u201d re-entries occurred in 2007 and 2008 and were the cause of separation failures on the modules, thus initiating a very stressful return for their three-person crews.<\/p>\n<p>Known as \u201cballistic entry\u201d \u2013 the crew have to endure much higher G-forces and land at an alternative site.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-55152\" class=\"wp-image-55152 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-175628.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1027\" height=\"683\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-175628.jpg 1027w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-175628-350x233.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-175628-526x350.jpg 526w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-175628-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-175628-585x390.jpg 585w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-175628-263x175.jpg 263w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1027px) 100vw, 1027px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-55152\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">An overview of the investigation into the ballistic return via STS-119 Shuttle Flight Readiness Review (FRR) documentation, L2<\/p>\n<p>An investigation (L2 Russian Section)&nbsp;noted issues with the long-term exposure to electromagnetic emissions on-orbit, and the potential to cause issues with the pyro bolts, came after an extensive investigation that included the removal and return of one pyro bolt from Soyuz TMA-12.<\/p>\n<p>Mitigation against this issue has resulted in no further issues with the module separation milestone in any of the following missions.<\/p>\n<p>Once through the plasma of entry interface, the capsule prepared for the deployment of its drogue chute. This readies the spacecraft for the deployment of its main parachute. This is one of the hardest parts of the return for the crew, which has been described as being inside a washing machine by some returning astronauts.<\/p>\n<p>The Soyuz craft then complete the return to terra firma, landing on the steppes of Kazakhstan at around 02:31 UTC.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-55154\" class=\"size-full wp-image-55154\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-200622.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1462\" height=\"927\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-200622.jpg 1462w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-200622-350x222.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-200622-552x350.jpg 552w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-200622-768x487.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/2018-02-27-200622-1170x742.jpg 1170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1462px) 100vw, 1462px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-55154\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A Soyuz landing \u2013 picture from ESA<\/p>\n<p>The exact timing of touchdown, under a \u201csoft\u201d thruster engine firing, is always dependent on a number of factors \u2013 such as the impact of winds on the Soyuz chutes \u2013 and can vary by several minutes.<\/p>\n<p>With the Soyuz safely back on Earth, ground and air crews will converge on the Soyuz and extract the crew from the SA.<\/p>\n<p>The crew will undergo immediate and preliminary health checks once outside their Soyuz spacecraft. All three are then transferred to a medical tent and then prepared for transit away from the landing site.<\/p>\n<p>Eventually, they will part ways to their respective countries and space agencies.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Expedition 54 Flight Engineers Mark Vande Hei and Joe Acaba of NASA and Commander Alexander Misurkin of Roscosmos have returned from the International Space Station (ISS) in their Soyuz MS-06 spacecraft. The trio landed on the steppes of Kazakhstan around 02:31 UTC. During their 168 days in space, they were part of the first expedition [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":25784,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[233,1302],"class_list":["post-38532","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-iss","tag-soyuz"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38532"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38532"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38532\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25784"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38532"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38532"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38532"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}