{"id":38949,"date":"2016-09-28T23:06:41","date_gmt":"2016-09-28T15:06:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/orbital-atk-prepares-for-final-casting-of-sls-em-1-flight-srbs\/"},"modified":"2016-09-28T23:06:41","modified_gmt":"2016-09-28T15:06:41","slug":"orbital-atk-prepares-for-final-casting-of-sls-em-1-flight-srbs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/orbital-atk-prepares-for-final-casting-of-sls-em-1-flight-srbs\/","title":{"rendered":"Orbital ATK prepares for final casting of SLS EM-1 flight SRBs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Following the highly successful test firing of the Qualification Motor 2 (QM-2) at their proving grounds near Promontory, Utah, Orbital ATK is preparing for the second half of casting operations for the Solid Rocket Booster segments that will power the SLS EM-1 mission through the first two minutes of flight \u2013 while at the same time working through a minor issue that is not expected to affect SLS SRB production timelines.<\/p>\n<p><b>QM-2: success for cold temp firing of SRB:<\/b><\/p>\n<p>QM-2 was the second in a two part qualification firing program for the new five-segment SRBs to validate the final configurations, manufacturing processes, propellant design, and operational temperature range for the propulsion element that will provide 86.74% of SLS\u2019s thrust at liftoff.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-47105 alignleft\" src=\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.21.59-350x262.png\" alt=\"Screen Shot 2016-09-26 at 17.21.59\" width=\"350\" height=\"262\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.21.59-350x262.png 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.21.59-468x350.png 468w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.21.59-768x575.png 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.21.59.png 1048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\">The first qualification test, QM-1, validated all of these elements in the high-end of the SRB certified operational temperature range; QM-2 tested the low-end temperature range.<\/p>\n<p>While the SRB high-end temperature range never caused a delay or concern for delay during the Shuttle program, the low-end temperature range became a major consideration for flight operations in 1985.<\/p>\n<p>During the 24 January 1985 launch of Shuttle Discovery on STS-51C, liftoff occurred with an ambient air temperature of 53\u00b0F \u2013 having risen to that from a lower temperature in the preceding overnight hours.<\/p>\n<p>Post-flight recovery and inspection of the STS-51C SRBs revealed charring to the primary O-rings on both SRBs as well as a burn through penetration of the primary O-ring on the center field joint of the right SRB and heavy charring on the secondary O-ring \u2013 indicating a near burn through event of the field joint.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-47106 alignleft\" src=\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.26.01-350x197.png\" alt=\"Screen Shot 2016-09-26 at 17.26.01\" width=\"350\" height=\"197\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.26.01-350x197.png 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.26.01-621x350.png 621w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.26.01-768x433.png 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.26.01-1920x1082.png 1920w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.26.01-1170x659.png 1170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\">Despite this revelation to Morton Thiokol (predecessor to ATK), the reality of minimum operational temperature limits for SRB certified use was not readily understood by everyone one year and four days later.<\/p>\n<p>NASA educational resources<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Rocket building kits<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>NASA mission updates<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>On 28 January 1986, with a predicted air temperature of just 34\u00b0F at the 09:36 EST targeted launch time of STS-51L, Challenger was approved for launch by NASA and Morton Thiokol managers over what, at the time, were unknown to NASA objections from Thiokol engineers due specifically to the hard freeze temperatures reached at the pad in the overnight hours.<\/p>\n<p>During the Rogers\u2019 Commission hearings into the loss of Challenger, several Thiokol officials\u2019 testimonies revealed seemingly conflicting understandings on the minimal safe operational temperatures for the SRBs.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-17776\" src=\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/01\/A25.jpg\" alt=\"A25\" width=\"350\" height=\"342\">A key element revealed at the hearings were that some engineers&nbsp;thought&nbsp;53\u00b0F was cold enough to be problematic while others thought the temperature had to be much lower \u2013 at 40\u00b0F.<\/p>\n<p>Other testimony complicating understanding of the minimal safe temperatures for the SRBs revolved around whether that 40\u00b0F lower limit was air temperature or propellant mean bulk temperature \u2013 a significant difference given that the mean bulk propellant temperature for Challenger\u2019s SRBs was calculated to be above both the 40\u00b0F and 53\u00b0F limits discussed.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless, safety improvements, joint heaters, and a structured minimum allowable air temperature for launch chart was created in the wake of Challenger and adhered to for the duration of the program.<\/p>\n<p>Since 1986, Thiokol \u2013 which became ATK and now Orbital ATK \u2013 has maintained a dedication to understanding how the SRBs operate in their lower and maximum temperature ranges.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-47103 alignleft\" src=\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.20.49-350x265.png\" alt=\"Screen Shot 2016-09-26 at 17.20.49\" width=\"350\" height=\"265\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.20.49-350x265.png 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.20.49-462x350.png 462w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.20.49-768x582.png 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Screen-Shot-2016-09-26-at-17.20.49.png 1046w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\">For QM-2, which was fired on 28 June 2016, Jeff Foote, Orbital ATK Vice President of NASA Programs, noted that \u201cQM-2 was a very clean and highly successful test firing. &nbsp;Instrumentation data yield was extremely good, and included some instrumentation that will fly on EM-1.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>At this time, all major disassembly operations of the QM-2 motor have been completed, and Orbital ATK\u2019s teams are continuing to dissect components and make standard measurements in the nozzle and case insulation. <\/p>\n<p>Of particular note, the redesigned nozzle joint 1 performance was \u201cexcellent\u201d, and Orbital ATK was able to use QM-2 to gather \u201cvaluable dynamics data\u201d on the Aft Booster Separation Motors (BSM) and housing \u2013 the first time such data has been gathered on a five segment SRB.<\/p>\n<p><b>SLS EM-1 booster casting operations:<\/b><\/p>\n<p>As with most things in spaceflight, operations usually parallel and overlap with one another.<\/p>\n<p>This was certainly the case with the QM-2 static fire in June and the commencement of casting operations for the flight set SRBs that will propel the EM-1 mission skyward in 2018. <\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-47149\" src=\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/2016-09-28-201713-350x213.jpg\" alt=\"2016-09-28-201713\" width=\"350\" height=\"213\">As of this month, Orbital ATK has completed casting of five of the 10 booster segments for the SLS EM-1 mission. <\/p>\n<p>In casting order, Orbital ATK currently has the Left Hand (LH) aft segment, the Right Hand (RH) center\/forward segment, LH center\/forward, LH forward, and RH aft segments cast.<\/p>\n<p>However, casting operations are currently on hold pending the outcome of an investigation into cracking of a thin adhesive layer within the insulation that was discovered during routine testing of samples that were not taken from the already cast EM-1 segments.<\/p>\n<p>Orbital ATK elaborated on this point to NASASpaceflight.com, stating that \u201cThere has been no cracking of any material within the propellant\/liner\/insulation system in the inspected EM-1 segments and QM segments that have been dissected. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe question has to do with a thin adhesive layer within the insulation and whether stresses under long-term storage conditions challenge structural margins in very specific regions of some segments.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"widget-title penci-border-arrow\">See Also<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>LIVE: QM-2 Firing<\/li>\n<li>L2 SLS Section<\/li>\n<li>L2&nbsp;SRB Section<\/li>\n<li>Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Mr Foote elaborated, stating that \u201cOver the summer, some insulation samples were tested for the purpose of overall design certification analysis. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe samples revealed the possibility of some brittle behavior in the adhesive layer under specific test conditions that are outside of normal vehicle operating parameters.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUntil that possibility is fully assessed, a minor change was made to alleviate the concern in certain areas of the segment insulation and that will cause a short schedule pause in segment casting in order to implement.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>At this time, casting is set to resume in early November with the RH forward segment. <\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-46370\" src=\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/2016-08-12-013933-350x223.jpg\" alt=\"2016-08-12-013933\" width=\"350\" height=\"223\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/2016-08-12-013933-350x223.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/2016-08-12-013933-549x350.jpg 549w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/2016-08-12-013933-768x489.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/2016-08-12-013933.jpg 857w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\">This will then be followed by casting of the two center segments, before moving on to cast the RH center\/aft, and the LH center\/aft segments.<\/p>\n<p>Of note, this minor delay to casting is not expected to have any impact on the overall EM-1 SRB production timeline.<\/p>\n<p>After casting operations are complete, the segments will undergo standard post-casting inspections and verifications before entering final production facility processing in 2017.<\/p>\n<p>Of the five segments already cast, all five of them have \u201cpassed through NDT (x-ray) inspection\u201d, notes Mr. Foote.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-46373\" src=\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/2016-08-12-014548-350x259.jpg\" alt=\"2016-08-12-014548\" width=\"350\" height=\"259\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/2016-08-12-014548-350x259.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/2016-08-12-014548-472x350.jpg 472w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/2016-08-12-014548.jpg 544w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\">Under the current production schedule, all 10 segments will be ready for delivery to KSC in September 2017.<\/p>\n<p>As with Shuttle, the SRB segments will make their way across the U.S. via railcar \u2013 using the same cars that were used to transport all of the Shuttle SRB segments to Kennedy.<\/p>\n<p>Following the 10 SRB propellant segments across the country will be the two aft skirts \u2013 which will ship to KSC in October 2017.<\/p>\n<p>The two forward skirts will then follow in February 2018 ahead of SRB stacking operations in the VAB \u2013 which is currently slated to begin in March 2018.<\/p>\n<p>(Images: NASA, Orbital ATK, L2 \u2013 via Philip Sloss)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following the highly successful test firing of the Qualification Motor 2 (QM-2) at their proving grounds near Promontory, Utah, Orbital ATK is preparing for the second half of casting operations for the Solid Rocket Booster segments that will power the SLS EM-1 mission through the first two minutes of flight \u2013 while at the same [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":30032,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[624,7806],"class_list":["post-38949","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-sls","tag-srb"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38949"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38949"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38949\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30032"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38949"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}