NASA\u2019s Exploration Systems Development office has completed its review of progress to date as well as forward path activity on the development of the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket to the NASA Advisory Council. While several tasks and issues remain open, SLS continues a steady march toward its planned debut in late 2018 during the EM-1 mission as NASA continues to refine the rocket\u2019s overall configuration thrust profiles.<\/p>\n
Current status:<\/b><\/p>\n
Overall, the first seven months of 2016 have seen significant progress in the development of various structural test articles and the overall elements of the SLS vehicle that need to be tested prior to the EM-1 flight.<\/p>\n
![\"Screen](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Screen-Shot-2016-08-15-at-12.41.14-350x262.png\")
Critically, most of the elements for the inaugural flight of SLS are no longer considered to be on the critical path toward making the \u201cNot Later Than December 2018\u201d launch window, according to the latest integrated milestone summary.<\/p>\n
As reinforced by Bill Hill, Deputy Associate Administrator of the Exploration Systems Directorate (ESD) in his presentation to the NASA Advisory Council (NAC) last month, only three elements of SLS are now on a critical path for the EM-1 flight.<\/p>\n
Those three elements are the Crew Module Adapter (CMA) and European Service Module (ESM) duo, the Orion crew module, and the Core Stage (CS) itself.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe have three primary critical paths,\u201d noted Mr. Hill. \u201cThe primary critical path is the ESM and the CMA. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
NASA mission patches (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n \u201cAbout a month and a half ago, during the CDR (Critical Design Review) for the ESM, we were informed that they were going to deliver as much as 10 months late. We worked with them to get it back to three [months late]. We believe that\u2019s a viable schedule, and we\u2019re looking to integrate that.\u201d<\/p>\n As for Orion, Mr. Hill stated that it is the \u201csecondary critical path only because once we join it up with the ESM\/CMA, that integrated stack\u2019s delivery to the Ground Systems folks was anticipated in January of \u201818. And now it\u2019ll probably be in April of \u201818 based on the late delivery of the ESM.\u201d<\/p>\n Finally, the CS is the third and \u2013 right now \u2013 last critical path item for SLS and EM-1.<\/p>\n One of those innovative fixes described by Mr. Hill came in regards to the Orion crew module and the flight software development program.<\/p>\n As Mr. Hill related, an issue with Orion development that would have caused a 125 day hit to software development was cut to just a 25 day hit when the teams were able to realign the software development timeline and strategy.<\/p>\n However, while those are the three major flight hardware elements on the critical path toward SLS\u2019s EM-1 flight, other technical issues are being identified, tracked, and worked by teams around the country. <\/p>\n As stated in the ESD presentation to NAC, \u201cThe [Cross Program Integration Team \u2013 CPIT] is watching several items discussed as \u2018Top\u2019 or \u2018Emerging\u2019 issues [that] will have interdependency impacts or be negotiated through the interdependency process.\u201d<\/p>\n The OSMU was redesigned in mid-2015 to \u201cminimize the amount of movement of the plungers and prevent premature release of the mechanism,\u201d notes the ESD presentation to NAC.<\/p>\n To prevent the premature release, a collet \u2013 a segmented band or sleeve put around a shaft or spindle and tightened so as to grip it \u2013 was added. However, subsequent testing then showed that the collet would not release.<\/p>\n \u201cFurther design changes \u2013 increasing spring size, addition of lubrication, and removal of sharp edge \u2013 [were] made with successful test results,\u201d notes the ESD presentation.<\/p>\n Nevertheless, \u201cDuring secondary release testing at LETF (Launch Equipment Test Facility), collet receptacle came free instead of remaining attached to the collet.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cSo we got into the redesign and got that knocked out. The problem we\u2019re having now is the possibility of a piece of FOD (Foreign Object Debris) or hardware being released when we undo a secondary release. <\/p>\n \u201cIn other words, what happens is if the umbilical doesn\u2019t come out for some reason, a secondary release would be a 10,000 pound shear pin that would pop [the umbilical] off. <\/p>\n \u201cAnd there\u2019s a cup that holds that pin, and it should come back with the umbilical. What happened a couple times in the testing is that the cup released [from the umbilical arm] after it pulled away from the surface structure.<\/p>\n A second issue related to the OSMU was also presented by Mr. Smith. <\/p>\n This OSMU relates to an operation performed in the VAB prior to rollout.<\/p>\n According to the ESD presentation, \u201cPerforming the mechanical release and retract with the OSMU could damage the ground and\/or flight plate and cause a significant risk to continued processing and launch.\u201d<\/p>\n Mr. Smith noted that this is the Umbilical Release Retract Test (URRT), and has actually been resolved.<\/p>\n \u201cWe pulled together a team to look at that and came up with an alternative plan that will accomplish the objectives of the test without putting any of the hardware or our systems at risk.\u201d<\/p>\n Moreover, a third issue discussed related to the ICPS umbilical loads, which are currently more than 200% over the design loads of the umbilicals.<\/p>\n \u201cWe were originally going to use the flight plates they have for ICPS on Delta. But we\u2019re obviously doing things a little differently than they do in the Delta system.<\/p>\n \u201cSo we found that the plates were about 200% over the hardware design limits on Delta system. So we\u2019re working at that, and we think we\u2019ve got a solution. We\u2019re looking at the way the hose cradle with the bungee cords are situated that will reduce our moment loads. And we think we can get that in the box.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cCurrently, VSS clearance is showing positive; however, the interface does not actually separate until around a max of T+ 220 Msec. This could have an impact on liftoff loads,\u201d notes the ESD presentation. <\/p>\n A JICB (Joint Investigation Control Board) action was subsequently opened to investigate the possible of separating the VSS at T-0.25 to ensure a clean separation by T0.<\/p>\n As stated by Mr. Hill, \u201cThe challenge that I see is that if we fire the [VSS] pyros at T0, will it get away and out of the way before the vehicle progresses up under all the distributed wind conditions and so forth. <\/p>\n \u201cOne downside of that is that we can\u2019t access it if we drop it off and have to reapply it. At the pad, we have no access.<\/p>\n Mr. Smith added later in the presentation that the issue of separating the VSS at T-0.25 seconds when weighed against the possibility of an on-pad abort sometime thereafter was not really an issue.<\/p>\n \u201cWe don\u2019t believe this will cause us a problem because at that point we\u2019re really, effectively at that point, going. But we are doing some risk trades about what that would mean. <\/p>\n The only other item that received significant discussion from the NAC, and one that is not an issue, regarded the fact that SLS will not use hold down bolts to clamp it to the pad.<\/p>\n Hold down bolts during the Shuttle era were crucial to maintaining the vehicle\u2019s alignment on the pad as the main engines fired up and the vehicle twang back under the force generated by its three SSMEs \u2013 which fired through the vehicle\u2019s center of gravity. <\/p>\n However, SLS will not have this twang effect as its four RS-25 engines will fire directly up the vehicle. <\/p>\n \nMr. Hill noted that the immense weight of the SLS rocket (between 5.75 and 6 million pounds) is more than enough to keep it grounded firmly to the launch pad during the fire up sequence of the four RS-25 engines (which \u2013 at liftoff \u2013 will only be producing about 2 million pounds of thrust).<\/p>\n The fact that SLS\u2019s engines will be started in a staggered sequence to avoid pogo oscillations and shut down in a staggered sequence in the event of a pad abort will prevent any misalignment of the SLS the NAC was worried about.<\/p>\n Additionally, the SRBs will be stacked on top of mounting pins that will ensure proper alignment of the vehicle is held through engine start and through an on-pad shutdown sequence, should that happen.<\/p>\n SLS Block 1 and Block 1B propulsion profile updates:<\/b><\/p>\n On the technical and engineering specifications side, NASA has updated the designs and propulsion profiles for the Block 1 and Block 1B configurations of SLS for the EM-1 and EM-2 flights, respectively. <\/p>\n EM-1\u2019s primary payload will be the Orion and its Launch Abort System, as well as 13 secondary payload CubeSats.<\/p>\n The vehicle will carry a super heavy-lift exploration class design and will weigh \u2013 fully loaded \u2013 5.75 million pounds.<\/p>\n At liftoff, the four RS-25 liquid fueled engines and twin five segments Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs) will produce 8.3 million pounds of thrust, with the vehicle reaching maximum thrust approximately 20 seconds after liftoff at an altitude of 2,000 feet \u2013 at which point it will produce 8.8 million pounds of thrust.<\/p>\n The Block 1 configuration will be able to deliver 154,324 pounds (70 metric tons) to Low Earth Orbit (LEO), and will be able to place 56,659 pounds (25.6 metric tons) into TLI. <\/p>\n Breaking down the performance further, each SRB will produce approximately 3.6 million pounds of thrust (in a vacuum) \u2013 for a combined thrust from the two SRBs of 7.2 million pounds (in a vacuum).<\/p>\n The two SRBs will burn for the same amount of time as they did during Shuttle launches, just over two minutes \u2013 as burn time for solid boosters is not dependent on the number of segments but rather the segment diameters, which are unchanged from Shuttle.<\/p>\n At liftoff, the Core Stage will carry 537,000 gallons of liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid oxygen (LOX) \u2013 341,000 gallons of LH2 and 196,000 gallons of LOX. <\/p>\n Total burn time for the Core Stage engines will be slightly less than the three liquid-fueled main engines burned for Shuttle launches, coming in at an approximate burn time of 500 seconds (8mins 20secs) for SLS.<\/p>\n Given a pre-launch start time of T-6.3 seconds for the engines, Core Stage engine cut-off will come approximately 8 minutes 13.7 seconds after liftoff \u2014 a full 9.7 seconds earlier than Shuttle.<\/p>\n Finally, the other main propulsive element for the Block 1 SLS, the ICPS, will utilize a single RL10B-2 engine capable of providing approximately 700 seconds of burn time and a maximum thrust of 24,750 pounds.<\/p>\n The primary difference between Block 1 and Block 1B comes with the upper stage, which will be replaced from the ICPS to the Exploration Upper Stage (EUS). <\/p>\n In the Block 1B configuration, the vehicle will weigh 6 million pounds at liftoff and will be capable of accelerating the Orion spacecraft and its associated hardware to 38,403 kph (23,863 mph) following the TLI burn. <\/p>\n The rocket will also be able to place 231,485 pounds (105 metric tons) to LEO and 88,185 pounds (40 metric tons) into TLI. <\/p>\n The EUS will utilize four RL10C3-1 engines capable of delivering a combined maximum thrust of approximately 96,000 pounds for a total burn time of 350 seconds for LEO ascent and 925 seconds for the TLI burn.<\/p>\n (Images: NASA and L2 \u2013 including SLS renders from L2 artist Nathan Koga \u2013 The full gallery of Nathan\u2019s (SpaceX Dragon to MCT, SLS, Commercial Crew and more) L2 images can be *found here*)<\/p>\n (To join L2, click here: \/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/l2\/)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" NASA\u2019s Exploration Systems Development office has completed its review of progress to date as well as forward path activity on the development of the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket to the NASA Advisory Council. While several tasks and issues remain open, SLS continues a steady march toward its planned debut in late 2018 during the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":30188,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3718,4011,640,624],"class_list":["post-38985","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-em-1","tag-em-2","tag-orion","tag-sls"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38985"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38985"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38985\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38985"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38985"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38985"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"Screen](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Screen-Shot-2016-08-15-at-13.00.53-350x282.png\")
\u201cThe Core Stage rebaselining pushes delivery of that one out to March of \u201818, when it was anticipated to be delivered in January of \u201818,\u201d related Mr. Hill. \u201cSo we\u2019re working those issues. We\u2019re staying ahead of it. We\u2019re looking at thoughtful but innovative ways to redo our schedule.\u201d<\/p>\n![\"2015-07-07-162946\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/2015-07-07-162946-350x221.jpg\")
One issue, that had been closed but is now reopened, pertains to the Orion Service Module Umbilical (OSMU) which releases at T0.<\/p>\n![\"2015-07-07-151308\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/2015-07-07-151308-350x245.jpg\")
As related by Marshall Smith from the Integration Team, \u201cInitially, for the Orion Service Module Umbilical, we were doing some testing at the LETF and we had some issues initially about a year ago where it was failing to release like we needed to. <\/p>\n![\"Screen](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Screen-Shot-2016-08-15-at-12.40.35-350x244.png\")
\u201cSo we reopened this issue. We\u2019re actually not even sure this is a credible failure because of the way the test was set up. But we\u2019ve got a tiger team, so we\u2019ll have more information on this as we move forward.\u201d<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Z8.jpg\" "\\"Z8\\"")
\u201cWe initially were worried that doing the [URRT] test in the VAB might damage the actual flight plate and introduce a possible contamination risk to the system that we have in the VAB when we were ready to roll out. <\/p>\n![\"Screen](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Screen-Shot-2016-08-15-at-12.53.30-350x253.png\")
A final issue noted by the ESD is with the new Vehicle Stabilization System (VSS) arm that will clamp onto SLS\u2019s intertank section. <\/p>\n![\"2016-07-21-194003\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/2016-07-21-194003-350x206.jpg\")
\u201cSo we\u2019re looking at when the latest we can actually do that before firing the SRBs is and seeing if we can drop it away and then fire the SRB shortly after that. So we\u2019re encouraging the folks to have that separate before T0. Right now it\u2019s a T0 separation. But we\u2019re looking at \u2026 dropping that a quarter second or so ahead of T0. <\/p>\n![\"2016-07-07-220110\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/2016-07-07-220110-350x206.jpg\")
\u201cThe engineering between SLS and KSC are working some actions right now to make sure we\u2019re bringing this forward for a decision in the fall for how we think we\u2019ll move forward on this.\u201d<\/p>\n![\"2016-07-21-194046\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/2016-07-21-194046-350x250.jpg\")
When Mr. Hill noted that there are no hold down bolts for SLS, this prompted some members of the NAC to ask what was actually holding the vehicle to the pad and what the implications of no hold down bolts were.<\/p>\n![\"Screen](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Screen-Shot-2016-08-15-at-12.26.37-350x308.png\")
According to the SLS Block Image Approval Revision 23 document, available for download on L2, the SLS Block 1 for E-1 will \u201cDemonstrate SLS and Orion critical mission events, integrated vehicle and ground systems operations, and autonomous Orion crew vehicle deep space and re-entry operations; validate loads and environments (including aerodynamic, acoustic, structural, thermal, and radiation), and deploy secondary payloads.\u201d<\/p>\n![\"Screen](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Screen-Shot-2016-03-10-at-10.55.13-350x241.png\")
Combined with the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS), the SLS Block 1 will be able to accelerate the Orion capsule to 36,371 kph (22,600 mph) for Trans Lunar Injection (TLI).<\/p>\n![\"Screen](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Screen-Shot-2016-08-15-at-12.27.06-350x327.png\")
The SRBs will be aided during first stage flight by the Core Stage, with its four RS-25 engines each producing a maximum thrust of 512,000 pounds (in a vacuum) while operating at 109% of rated performance.<\/p>\n![\"2016-07-07-144728\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/2016-07-07-144728-350x251.jpg\")
For the Block 1B configuration, all thrust parameters for the Core Stage\u2019s four RS-25 engines and twin SRBs \u2013 as well as the maximum and liftoff thrust profiles of the rocket \u2013 remain unchanged from the Block 1 configuration.<\/p>\n