- \n
- LIVE: BEAM Expansion<\/li>\n
- SpaceX Missions Section<\/li>\n
- L2 SpaceX Section<\/li>\n
- Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
TransHab was a very large module which would have contained crew quarters, exercise equipment, hygiene facilities, food preparation hardware, and storage for the ISS, as well as serving as a technology demonstration for future deep-space inflatable habitats.<\/p>\n
Ultimately, the rising costs and lengthy delays experienced by the ISS program in the late 1990s led to NASA being ordered to cease all work on the TransHab concept in 2000, which effectively ended the prospect of seeing an inflatable module on the ISS.<\/p>\n
However, in the early 2000s, commercial company Bigelow Aerospace, founded by businessman Robert Bigelow in 1999 with the aim of developing the world\u2019s first commercial space station, purchased the rights to the TransHab patents developed by NASA and continued to conduct research into the field of inflatable space modules.<\/p>\n
![\"2016-05-26-095451\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/2016-05-26-095451-350x264.jpg\")
In 2006, using company funding, Bigelow Aerospace launched the first ever inflatable module into space, the Genesis I, aboard a Russian Dnepr rocket. The module was only small, but it successfully proved the concept that a module could be launched deflated, and later inflated and retain pressure once in space.<\/p>\nRocket building kits
<\/path>Technology News <\/path>Spaceflight news subscription <\/path>\n (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n
After nearly ten years on-orbit, Genesis I still retains its pressure integrity, proving that inflatable modules are viable as long-term space habitats. In 2007, Bigelow Aerospace launched a second inflatable demonstration module, Genesis II, into Low Earth Orbit, which also continues to hold pressure with no issues.<\/p>\n
Since that time, Bigelow Aerospace has continued to conduct research into, and refine concepts for inflatable modules, however with a current lack of commercial human spacecraft, finding an initial customer for an inflatable commercial space station has proven challenging.<\/p>\n
A Bigelow module on ISS:<\/p>\n
In January 2011, NASASpaceflight.com was made aware of a proposal to fly a small Bigelow inflatable module on the ISS as a technology demonstration activity.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/01\/A312.jpg\")
This presented benefits to Bigelow in the form of demonstrating an inflatable module in a human environment, thus improving potential customer confidence, and to NASA by validating the concept of inflatable modules for use in future exploration architectures.<\/p>\nAfter nearly two years of negotiations, a 17.8-million-dollar contract between NASA and Bigelow was signed in December 2012, in a now increasingly common (and successful) practice whereby NASA contracts ISS services to commercial providers, rather than try and develop capabilities entirely on its own.<\/p>\n
BEAM is a relatively small module as compared to other ISS modules, with an internal volume of 565 cubic feet \/ 16 cubic meters. It is constructed from two metal bulkheads at either end of the module, and multiple layers of impact-resistant material in between. It features a smaller, unique Common Berthing Module (CBM) hatch than the standard ISS CBM hatches.<\/p>\n
![\"2016-04-12-205800\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/2016-04-12-205800-350x221.jpg\")
BEAM contains radiation sensors to record the levels of radiation inside the module, which research has shown may actually be less than standard metal modules due to the fact that the vinyl polymer material used in BEAM\u2019s construction exhibits radiation shielding properties.<\/p>\nIn addition, BEAM will contain impact sensors to detect any debris strikes that may occur, although BEAM is certified to withstand the same impacts as metallic modules. Theory also suggests that inflatable modules could be better able to withstand debris impacts than metal modules, as inflatable modules may deform to absorb impacts more than rigid metal modules.<\/p>\n
BEAM also features a temperature sensor, a pressure sensor, and a sensor to record dynamic loads during module inflation. This information will be gathered over BEAM\u2019s two-year lifespan, resulting in a wealth of data regarding the function of an inflatable module in a crew environment.<\/p>\n
BEAM inflation:<\/p>\n
Following its launch inside the CRS-9 Dragon on 8th April and its installation to the Node 3 Aft port on 16th April, BEAM was to be inflated, also termed \u201cexpanded\u201d Thursday after sitting dormant on the Station port for over one month.<\/p>\n
Notably, the module has been tightly packed in its launch configuration since last year in preparation for what was a delayed March arrival for integration with the CRS-8 Dragon Trunk, which had led to questions into how it would perform from even Robert Biglow himself.<\/p>\n
![\"2016-05-26-095653\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/2016-05-26-095653-350x247.jpg\")
The actual inflation process is mostly an automated sequence controlled using a specially designed deployment controller located inside the ISS, with some manual input required by the crew at certain stages.<\/p>\nWith the vestibule pressurisation and Node 3 Aft CBM hatch opening having already occurred, the first stage of the inflation was to close the ascent vent valve, which has been ensuring that BEAM has been kept at vacuum since its launch into space last month.<\/p>\n
The restraint straps that have been keeping BEAM in its tightly packed form were then be released, following which the module\u2019s bulkhead will be released in order to allow it to expand, whereupon the actual inflation process will begin.<\/p>\n
This was the initial issue, with the NASA Standard Initiators (NSIs) failing to indicate they had fired, which is required to ensure the straps would release as the module expanded.<\/p>\n
![\"2016-05-26-105351\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/2016-05-26-105351-350x221.jpg\")
However, after some troubleshooting, Jeff Williams was able to confirm the NSIs had fired, allowing for the process to continue.<\/p>\nUnlike the traditional model of inflation, where air is blown directly into the object in the same way as a balloon is inflated, in the case of inflatable modules, air is actually blown into bladders located between the layers of material that make up the module\u2019s skin.<\/p>\n
Originally, the plan was to use air from tanks located inside BEAM to inflate these bladders, however analysis showed that this could cause expansion to occur too fast and potentially place damagingly high loads on the ISS in the process, so instead the air will be supplied from the station in a more controlled manner.<\/p>\n
![\"2016-05-26-135353\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/2016-05-26-135353-350x270.jpg\")
As such, this was done via Williams opening a Manual Pressure Equalisation Valve (MPEV) on BEAM\u2019s hatch.<\/p>\nIt was not actually known precisely how the inflation dynamics would occur, as it has only ever been done twice before (Genesis I and II), neither of which were of the same construction or size as BEAM.<\/p>\n
This proved to be a learning curve, as after two hours of adding a few seconds of air into the module, only the width expanded, as opposed to the length.<\/p>\n
Mission controllers decided it would be best to defer operations for the day to allow them to evaluate the next steps.<\/p>\n
Those evaluations took place on Friday, allowing for managers to gain confidence in a second attempt on Saturday.<\/p>\n
![\"2016-05-26-135647\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/2016-05-26-135647-350x240.jpg\")
Before the work was completed, there were four separate models for how BEAM may actually fully inflate.<\/p>\nThe BEAM deployment itself will provide valuable data as to how modules expand in space, which will help inform future inflation models.<\/p>\n
The work on Saturday was long and drawn out, as small amounts of air were added over the course of seven hours.<\/p>\n
However, once past the 40 inch mark of expansion, calls to increase the flow of air resulted in a dramatic expansion to 67 inches in the space of just 15 minutes.<\/p>\n
![\"2016-05-28-213509\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/2016-05-28-213509-350x249.jpg\")
With BEAM fully inflated, the interior volume will still be unpressurized, as air will not have been pumped into the internal workings of the module during the expansion phase.<\/p>\nThus, eight air tanks located inside BEAM were used to pressurize the module to ISS atmospheric pressure.<\/p>\n
An 80-hour leak check phase will then be performed, prior to BEAM\u2019s hatch being opened, which will allow for the historic milestone of humans being able to enter an inflatable module in space for the first time, in the process giving the ISS a new module for the first time since March 2011 with the installation of the PMM.<\/p>\n
![\"Screen](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Screen-Shot-2016-04-09-at-13.14.01-350x246.png\")
However, the hatch will not remain open for long, as for the majority of the time it will stay closed, due to the fact that BEAM is actually classed as a technology demonstration experiment, rather than an additional module for the ISS. The crew are planned to periodically enter BEAM around 2-3 times every 6 months, in order to conduct a check of the interior and replace some sensors.<\/p>\nBEAM will not be used for any storage during its time on the ISS, since it\u2019s technology demonstration status presents a risk of potentially losing any hardware stored inside BEAM in the event of an issue occurring with the module.<\/p>\n
After a two-year demonstration period, BEAM will be depressurised and removed from the ISS via the station\u2019s robotic arm, whereupon it will be released to burn up in earth\u2019s atmosphere upon its eventual re-entry.<\/p>\n
The future of inflatables:<\/p>\n
While BEAM represents the end of a nearly 20-year journey to place an inflatable module on the ISS, going all the way back to TransHab in the late 1990s, it marks only the very beginning for inflatable modules in human spaceflight.<\/p>\n
![\"2016-04-16-023324\"](\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/2016-04-16-023324-350x235.jpg\")
Bigelow Aerospace recently announced their intention to launch one of their larger BA-330 modules into space by 2020, with an Atlas V launch already booked. Bigelow also made no secret of their desire to see the BA-330 placed on the ISS.<\/p>\nCalled XBASE (eXpandable Bigelow Advanced Station Enhancement), the module would increase the pressurised volume of the ISS by 30 per cent, and serve as a full-scale demonstrator of inflatable modules for use in future exploration, in addition to being made available to commercial customers for scientific experiments.<\/p>\n
Post-ISS, NASA wishes to turn over the Low Earth Orbit experimentation business to the private sector, where the prospect of an entirely commercial Bigelow space station is a distinct possibility.<\/p>\n
And in the longer term, while future exploration architectures continue to be in a state of flux, it is highly likely that any future architecture, be it government or commercial, will feature inflatable modules. And, once again, ISS is serving as the pathfinder for that future, whatever form it may ultimately take.<\/p>\n
Images: NASA and renders from L2 artist Nathan Koga \u2013 The full gallery of Nathan\u2019s (SpaceX Dragon to MCT, SLS, Commercial Crew and more) L2 images can be *found here*)<\/p>\n
(To join L2, click here: \/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/l2\/)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The International Space Station (ISS) gained a new module for the first time since March 2011 this weekend, with the Bigelow Expandable Activity Module (BEAM) expanded to its full size, bringing an end to an almost two-decade long effort to place an inflatable module on the station. The first expansion attempt did not go to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[8943,233],"class_list":["post-39048","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-bigelow","tag-iss"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39048"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39048"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39048\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39048"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39048"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39048"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}