{"id":39101,"date":"2016-03-28T17:06:23","date_gmt":"2016-03-28T09:06:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/concerns-grow-for-x-ray-astronomy-satellite-astro-h\/"},"modified":"2016-03-28T17:06:23","modified_gmt":"2016-03-28T09:06:23","slug":"concerns-grow-for-x-ray-astronomy-satellite-astro-h","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/concerns-grow-for-x-ray-astronomy-satellite-astro-h\/","title":{"rendered":"Concerns grow for X-ray astronomy satellite ASTRO-H"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Japan\u2019s ASTRO-H X-ray astronomy satellite is in trouble, just weeks after launch. Following a loss of nominal communication, observers have noted the spacecraft is tumbling, while tracking information has cataloged pieces of debris in the area of the satellite.&nbsp;The spacecraft is a high-energy astronomy mission led by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA).<\/p>\n<p>ASTRO-H Failure:<\/p>\n<p>Japan launched the ASTRO-H X-ray mission via its H-IIA rocket on February 17, launching from the country\u2019s Tanegashima launch site.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-44501\" src=\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/2016-03-28-182506-350x249.jpg\" alt=\"2016-03-28-182506\" width=\"350\" height=\"249\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/2016-03-28-182506-350x249.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/2016-03-28-182506-492x350.jpg 492w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/2016-03-28-182506.jpg 552w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\">As of later that month, the satellite appeared to be performing as advertised, with JAXA confirming the completion of a checkout sequence that included turning on the cooling system, test operations of the Soft X-ray Spectrometer (SXS), and extending the Extensible Optical Bench (EOB).<\/p>\n<p>This confirmed the Critical Operation Phase (COP) was completed.<\/p>\n<p>JAXA was then to perform the initial functional verification tasks of the onboard instruments for a period lasting about one and half months, before conducting calibration observations for another six weeks. The spacecraft would then be ready to begin full operational observations.<\/p>\n<p>However, over the weekend, JAXA noted that the spacecraft had failed to communicate as originally scheduled on Saturday. As such, controllers were unable to check the health of the satellite.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"widget-title penci-border-arrow\">See Also<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>UPDATES HII-A\/ASTRO-H<\/li>\n<li>Japanese Forum Section<\/li>\n<li>Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\u201cWhile the cause of communication failure is under investigation, JAXA received a short signal from the satellite, and is working for recovery,\u201d noted a statement from the agency.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUnder these circumstances, JAXA set up emergency headquarters for recovery and investigation. The headquarters held its first meeting (Saturday) and has been working for recovery and the investigation of the cause.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Spaceflight news subscription<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Spaceflight history books<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Space tourism guides<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>Space tracking information then noted the orbit of object 41337 (the spacecraft\u2019s tracking number) had dropped from 564.6\u00d7580.5 to 561.0\u00d7580.1 km just before the failed communication pass.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-43881 size-medium\" src=\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-015932-350x240.jpg\" alt=\"2016-02-17-015932\" width=\"350\" height=\"240\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-015932-350x240.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-015932-511x350.jpg 511w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-015932.jpg 652w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\">Joint Space Operations Center (JSpOC) \u2013 which detects, tracks, and identifies all artificial objects in Earth orbit \u2013 then noted several objects, potentially pointing to the observation of debris. However, the debris can\u2019t be identified and could simply be liberated insulation near the spacecraft.<\/p>\n<p>However, amateur&nbsp;trackers also cited they observed \u201ctumbling\u201d, as the satellite made its passes.<\/p>\n<p>The latest note from JSpOC on Monday&nbsp;spoke of a breakup being confirmed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnalysis shows ASTRO-H breakup occurred 26 March at 01:42 UTC. JSpOC confirmed breakup at 08:20 UTC.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>However, \u201cbreakup\u201d could be a reference to the observation of debris and JAXA is yet to provide a statement to confirm if the mission is lost. At present, no specific root cause of the issues has yet been noted.<\/p>\n<p>If the satellite (also named Hitomi) is still alive \u2013 as is potentially the case due to what JAXA described as a \u201cshort signal\u201d after the initial loss of main communications, something that is indicative of a tumbling spacecraft \u2013 there may still be a chance to put a plan in work that could recover the satellite.<\/p>\n<p>The spacecraft\u2019s status is likely to be updated later this week.<\/p>\n<p>Spacecraft Information:<\/p>\n<p>JAXA\u2019s mission is in partnership with NASA \u2013 along with the European Space Agency (ESA), Canadian Space Agency (CSA), Netherlands Institute for Space Research and universities in Japan, Europe and North America.<\/p>\n<p>Carrying a suite of instruments dedicated to observing X-rays, ASTRO-H \u2013 if successfully recovered \u2013 is expected to operate in low Earth orbit for three years.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-43884\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-021105-350x244.jpg\" alt=\"2016-02-17-021105\" width=\"350\" height=\"244\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-021105-350x244.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-021105-502x350.jpg 502w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-021105.jpg 627w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\">The 2,700-kilogram (6,000 lb) satellite is equipped with four telescopes and six detectors, which would allow it to study both \u201chard\u201d and \u201csoft\u201d X-rays and gamma rays.<\/p>\n<p>An X-ray is electromagnetic radiation with an energy of between 0.1 and 100 kiloelectronvolts (keV); between ultraviolet radiation and gamma rays in the electromagnetic spectrum.<\/p>\n<p>Astrophysicists term the most energetic X-rays as hard X-rays, typically ones with energies above 10 keV, while less energetic X-rays are termed \u201csoft\u201d. Gamma rays are more energetic still than hard x-rays.<\/p>\n<p>Once in orbit, a pair of three-panel solar arrays were tasked with providing a minimum of 3.5 kilowatts of power for the satellite\u2019s systems and instruments.<\/p>\n<p>The apertures of ASTRO-H\u2019s telescopes are located on the forward surface of the satellite, known as the Fixed Optical Bench (FOB), focussing incident X-rays onto the instruments. The FOB had successfully deployed during initial checkouts.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-43882\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-020933-350x252.jpg\" alt=\"2016-02-17-020933\" width=\"350\" height=\"252\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-020933-350x252.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-020933-487x350.jpg 487w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-020933.jpg 722w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\">The four telescopes include two Soft X-ray Telescopes; SXT-I and SXT-S. SXT-I focusses X-rays onto the Soft X-ray Imager (SXI), while SXT-S collects incident rays for the Soft X-ray Spectrometer (SXS).<\/p>\n<p>The remaining telescopes are a pair of Hard X-ray Telescopes (HXT), which focus hard X-rays onto imagers mounted to a six-meter (19-foot) boom at the rear of the spacecraft.<\/p>\n<p>With its boom \u2013 the Extensible Optical Bench (EOB) \u2013 fully deployed, ASTRO-H would grow to 14 meters (46 feet) long. This would enable a focal length of 12 meters (39 feet) for the hard X-ray imaging system.<\/p>\n<p>The twin Hard X-ray Imagers (HXI) collect X-rays with cadmium telluride detectors to produce images of the distribution of incident photons at energies of between five and eighty kiloelectronvolts within a nine-by-nine arcminute field of view.<\/p>\n<p>The soft X-ray detectors \u2013 which wouldn\u2019t require such a long focal length \u2013 are located within the body of the satellite \u2013 attached to the rear panel, or aft bulkhead.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-43883\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-021013-350x222.jpg\" alt=\"2016-02-17-021013\" width=\"350\" height=\"222\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-021013-350x222.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-021013-552x350.jpg 552w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/2016-02-17-021013.jpg 654w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\">The Soft X-ray Imager, or SXI, pair up with the SXT-I telescope to provide an imaging system that has a focal length of 5.6 meters and capable of imaging incident rays with energies between 0.4 and 12 keV. It has a field of view of 38 by 38 arcminutes.<\/p>\n<p>The Soft X-ray Spectrometer, or SXS, is a NASA instrument that consists of a high-resolution X-ray microcalorimeter which measures the energies of incident photons and produce spectra showing the intensity of individual energies in the observed radiation. The spectrometer is able to observe photons with energies of between 0.3 and 12 keV, with a resolution of fewer than 7 electronvolts.<\/p>\n<p>The instrument is equipped with filters which could be put into place to allow particularly intense X-ray sources to be observed while the satellite also carried its own X-ray source to allow the spectrometer to be calibrated.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-44503\" src=\"\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/2016-03-28-184326-350x241.jpg\" alt=\"2016-03-28-184326\" width=\"350\" height=\"241\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/2016-03-28-184326-350x241.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/2016-03-28-184326.jpg 503w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\">To achieve accurate results, the SXS will have to be cooled using a multi-stage liquid helium system to a temperature of 0.05 Kelvin (-273.10 degrees Celsius, -459.58 Fahrenheit).<\/p>\n<p>ASTRO-H also carries two Soft Gamma-ray Detectors (SGD), which use Compton telescopes to observe gamma rays through Compton scattering caused when the photons interact with semiconductor plates in the detector.<\/p>\n<p>Mounted on either side of the spacecraft, these sensors will be able to detect gamma ray sources emitting radiation with energies of between 60 and 600 keV.<\/p>\n<p>The latest statement from JAXA on Monday simply noted that the cause of the communication failure remains unknown and that further information will be provided when they have new data to provide.<\/p>\n<p>(Images via JAXA and NASA).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Japan\u2019s ASTRO-H X-ray astronomy satellite is in trouble, just weeks after launch. Following a loss of nominal communication, observers have noted the spacecraft is tumbling, while tracking information has cataloged pieces of debris in the area of the satellite.&nbsp;The spacecraft is a high-energy astronomy mission led by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). ASTRO-H Failure: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":30126,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3661,877],"class_list":["post-39101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-astro-h","tag-jaxa"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39101"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39101"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39101\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30126"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}