{"id":39581,"date":"2014-05-22T00:14:21","date_gmt":"2014-05-21T16:14:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/spacex-targets-june-11-for-falcon-9-orbcomm-og2-mission\/"},"modified":"2014-05-22T00:14:21","modified_gmt":"2014-05-21T16:14:21","slug":"spacex-targets-june-11-for-falcon-9-orbcomm-og2-mission","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/spacex-targets-june-11-for-falcon-9-orbcomm-og2-mission\/","title":{"rendered":"SpaceX targets June 11 for Falcon 9 ORBCOMM OG2 mission"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>SpaceX has realigned its next Falcon 9 v1.1 launch to NET (No Earlier Than) June 11. The rocket, tasked with lofting six ORBCOMM satellites into orbit, was scheduled to launch this month from Cape Canaveral\u2019s SLC-40. However, a helium leak during the latter stages of preparations for her Static Fire test required the rocket to be rolled back for repairs.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Falcon 9v1.1\/ORBCOMM OG2:<\/p>\n<p>SpaceX is currently working through a very busy 2014 manifest, with Falcon 9 stages departing their Californian nursery at the company\u2019s Hawthorne base for testing in McGregor, Texas \u2013 prior to shipping to SpaceX\u2019s coastal launch sites at Vandenberg and Cape Canaveral.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/04\/Z113.jpg\" alt=\"Z11\" width=\"349\" height=\"235\">The most recent launch saw the successful lofting of the CRS-3\/SpX-3 Dragon to the International Space Station (ISS), with a nominal performance of the Falcon 9 v1.1 during ascent resulting in what is now a completed mission for the spacecraft, following her splashdown in the Pacific Ocean on Sunday.<\/p>\n<p>While Dragon was enjoying her stay on the orbital outpost, SpaceX was already deep into preparations for the next launch, this time tasking their Falcon 9 v1.1 with lofting the first six ORBCOMM OG2 satellites into orbit.<\/p>\n<p>As per usual, the Falcon 9\u2019s successful testing at McGregor was to be followed by a Static Fire test at the Cape\u2019s SLC-40 launch pad.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-33419\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Z587.jpg\" alt=\"Z587\" width=\"349\" height=\"228\">Also known as a Hot Fire test, this effort relates to ensuring that the pad\u2019s fueling systems \u2013 and the launch vehicle \u2013 function properly in a fully operational environment, with numerous requirements to be successfully proven via such a test, such as the engine ignition and shut down commands, which have to operate as designed,&nbsp;and that the Merlin 1D engines perform properly during start-up.<\/p>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>Tasks also include a full propellant loading sequence, launch countdown operations, engine ignition operations and testing of the pad\u2019s high volume water deluge system.<\/p>\n<p>The May 8 test was proceeding to plan, with the&nbsp;loading of Falcon 9\u2019s RP-1 propellant with liquid oxygen oxidizer two hours and thirty five minutes before T-0.<\/p>\n<p>However, controllers noticed a problem during this fueling process, via indications of a helium leak inside the first stage.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"widget-title penci-border-arrow\">See Also<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>UPDATES: F9\/ORBCOMM Mission<\/li>\n<li>SpaceX Missions Section<\/li>\n<li>L2 SpaceX Section<\/li>\n<li>Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Thanks to the quick actions of controllers, along with the inbuilt relief systems on the stage, the rocket came to no harm on the pad. However, the problem resulted in a scrub of the Static Fire attempt.<\/p>\n<p>The vehicle was detanked and lowered on its strongback, before being rolled back into the nearby hanger where SpaceX rockets are processed ahead of launch.<\/p>\n<p>Specifics about the leak will likely involve SpaceX hardware that is proprietary by nature. However, the company did confirm it was a helium leak that put pay to the test, a leak that had not been previously observed on the hardware during its early life via testing \u2013 such as its validation test at the McGregor test site.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c(SpaceX can)&nbsp;confirm the issue was a helium leak in a different location that wasn\u2019t present during earlier tests,\u201d noted SpaceX spokesperson Emily Shanklin to NASASpaceFlight.com on Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>The location of the leak would have likely been in or around one of the&nbsp;helium tanks known as Composite Overwrap Pressure Vessels (COPV) \u2013 a vital element for the pressurization needs of the vehicle.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/A1111.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"347\" height=\"238\">Shuttle followers will recall the hardware being mentioned often in pre-launch Flight Readiness Review (FRR) documentation, given the orbiters had 24 of these tanks \u2013 which are kevlar-wrapped storage tanks for helium (He) and nitrogen (N2) gas \u2013 in various sizes and used at various pressures.<\/p>\n<p>A number of COPVs were donated by the retired orbiters for use with the Space Launch System (SLS), due to the commonality of systems.<\/p>\n<p>While it is not clear as to what stage of repair SpaceX engineers are involved with at this time, the company appears to be heading back into a launch stance \u2013 with evaluations into the launch readiness with the vehicle currently taking place.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Z91.jpg\" alt=\"Z9\" width=\"348\" height=\"232\">SpaceX has also picked a new launch date for the mission that will soon result in the first six ORBCOMM OG2\u2019s enjoying a ride uphill.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe are thoroughly reviewing the stage before clearing it for flight, as we want to make sure that no further such issues occur,\u201d added Ms. Shanklin. \u201cWe are now targeting June 11th with June 12th as a backup.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A launch on June 11 would result in a window that ranges from between&nbsp;21:30 and 22:24 local time, per L2 Cape launch schedule notes. The exact T-0 target may be refined closer to the launch date.<\/p>\n<p>SpaceX is also expected to return the rocket to the pad to complete the Static Fire test, which will provide additional assurances that the previous issue has been resolved ahead of launch.<\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #000000;\">(Images: SpaceX, NASA,&nbsp;Jacques van Oene\/Spacepatches.nl&nbsp;and via L2\u2019s Special Sections. L2 SpaceX section now includes thousands of unreleased images from all Dragon ISS missions \u2013 including CRS-3)<\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #000000;\">(Click here:&nbsp;http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/l2\/&nbsp;\u2013 to view how you can support NSF and access the best space flight content on the entire internet).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SpaceX has realigned its next Falcon 9 v1.1 launch to NET (No Earlier Than) June 11. The rocket, tasked with lofting six ORBCOMM satellites into orbit, was scheduled to launch this month from Cape Canaveral\u2019s SLC-40. However, a helium leak during the latter stages of preparations for her Static Fire test required the rocket to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":29999,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[8026,479,3842,316],"class_list":["post-39581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-copv","tag-falcon-9","tag-orbcomm","tag-spacex"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39581"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39581"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39581\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29999"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}