{"id":39833,"date":"2013-06-10T00:01:07","date_gmt":"2013-06-09T16:01:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/the-engines-that-refused-to-retire-rs-25s-prepare-for-sls-testing\/"},"modified":"2013-06-10T00:01:07","modified_gmt":"2013-06-09T16:01:07","slug":"the-engines-that-refused-to-retire-rs-25s-prepare-for-sls-testing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/the-engines-that-refused-to-retire-rs-25s-prepare-for-sls-testing\/","title":{"rendered":"The engines that refused to retire \u2013 RS-25s prepare for SLS testing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Following a 30 year career with the Space Shuttle Program, Pratt &amp; Whitney Rocketdyne\u2019s RS-25 engines are now preparing for their next role, with the Space Launch System (SLS). Tests involving the former Space Shuttle Main Engines (SSMEs) will begin at the Stennis Space Center in 2014.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>RS-25:<\/p>\n<p>The SSME has provided safe flight for the Shuttle\u2019s eight and a half minute ride to orbit since debuting with the Columbia during her launch in 1981. The engines proved their worth with only one major malfunction during its flight history, namely STS-51F (ME-1), resulting in a safe Abort To Orbit (ATO).<\/p>\n<p>The RS-25D is capable of achieving 400,000 lbs of thrust with an ISP of 453 seconds in a vacuum, or 363 seconds at sea level. The engines consist of over 50,000 parts and could be reused up to 20 times during their role with Shuttle.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"widget-title penci-border-arrow\">See Also<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>SLS Forum Section<\/li>\n<li>L2 SSME Section<\/li>\n<li>L2 SLS Section<\/li>\n<li>Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Following the decision to retire the Shuttle once the International Space Station had been assembled, the engines were set to live on with the Ares I Upper Stage. However, problems with the requirement for air-starting the engine for second stage flight altered NASA\u2019s direction towards the J-2X.<\/p>\n<p>With no future role for the RS-25s, NASA\u2019s Transition Control Board (TCB) \u2013 a body that was tasked with redirection of agency assets to the Constellation Program (CxP) \u2013 directed the shutdown of engine production capabilities in 2007. At the time it was determined that only four new engines would be required to satisfy the needs for the remaining Shuttle missions.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-29553\" title=\"SSME Production Shutdown Plan, via L2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Z72.jpg\" alt=\"SSME Production Shutdown Plan, via L2\" width=\"350\" height=\"246\">With the Constellation Program already struggling with budget and schedule concerns, a NASA Authorization Act in 2008 placed a temporary hold on the complete shutdown of RS-25 fabrication assets \u2013 mainly from the standpoint of spare hardware availability \u2013 as evaluations took place into short-term and long-term Shuttle extension possibilities.<\/p>\n<p>Space Shuttle models<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Rocket launch schedules<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Spaceflight history books<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>Thanks to the reusability of the SSMEs, only one additional \u201cfull engine\u201d would have been required, had a two year extension \u2013 past its original 2010 end date \u2013 occurred during the evaluations. In the end, only the Contingency Logistic Flights (CLFs) of STS-133 and STS-134 \u2013 along with the addition of STS-135 \u2013 were added to the manifest.<\/p>\n<p>One lesser known option for continuing to use the RS-25s came during development of the Ares V Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle (HLV).<\/p>\n<p>For other SSME News Articles, click here: http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/tag\/ssme\/<\/p>\n<p>The Ares V baseline consisted of a 10 meter core stage with six RS-68B engines, and two 5.5 segment solid boosters derived from the Ares I Program.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-29551\" title=\"The Magnum HLV, from 2005\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Z62.jpg\" alt=\"The Magnum HLV, from 2005\" width=\"353\" height=\"285\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Z62.jpg 353w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Z62-350x283.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 353px) 100vw, 353px\">However, with the Constellation Program looking for additional margin on lunar exploration missions \u2013 along with continued efforts to save money \u2013 managers returned to some of the original evaluations into the HLV via the ESAS (Exploration Systems Architecture Study) in 2005.<\/p>\n<p>The ESAS discussed a range of Cargo Launch Vehicles (CaLVs) during the early days of the Vision For Space Exploration (VSE), with CxP referencing that study as part of their interest in switching Ares V\u2019s baseline towards an 8.4m core with five or six expendable SSME\u2019s, two five segment SRBs, and two J2-S engines on the upper stage.<\/p>\n<p>The marriage between refining Ares V to a previous ESAS option also moved the vehicle closer to a more powerful HLV known as the \u201cMagnum\u201d, as outlined in the AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference Document from 2005.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-29552\" title=\"SLS Option in the RAC study, via L2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/A519.jpg\" alt=\"SLS Option in the RAC study, via L2\" width=\"325\" height=\"195\">However, the Ares V discussions focused on the potential use of five or six RS-25Es \u2013 the expendable version of the SSME \u2013 on the core stage.<\/p>\n<p>While the Ares V didn\u2019t survive the cull of the Constellation Program, data from the potential switch to RS-25s on the HLV likely fed into the RAC (Requirements Analysis Cycle) effort that was tasked with finding the best baseline for the new Space Launch System (SLS) rocket \u2013 the HLV that is now the focal point of NASA\u2019s latest Beyond Earth Orbit (BEO) drive.<\/p>\n<p>One key element of the Ares V study noted the the RS-25s may be better suited than RS-68s for mitigating the plume impingement and base heating issues that were an issue with the Ares V.<\/p>\n<p>In a cluster of engines, the nozzle must withstand both the heat from its own exhaust in addition to the outside exhaust plumes of the other engines in the cluster.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-29550\" title=\"Ares V Engine Evaluations, via L2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Z53.jpg\" alt=\"Ares V Engine Evaluations, via L2\" width=\"349\" height=\"267\">The study \u2013 available on L2 \u2013 noted that exhaust plumes of six RS-68 engines, combined with the two SRBs, interact to reduce the efficiency of the engines, and cause extreme heating on the base of the core stage.<\/p>\n<p>As such, the study claimed the regenerative nozzle of the RS-25 held an advantage over the ablative nozzle on the RS-68s, by providing more resilience, adding the regenerative nozzle protects both the inside and the outside of the nozzle, versus the ablative nozzle which is designed to deal with heat from only the inside.<\/p>\n<p>Numerous other factors saw the RS-25s selected as the engines for the SLS core stage, not least the law of the 2010 Authorization Act that ordered NASA to select a vehicle that used both Shuttle and former Constellation Program hardware, confirming the engines would live on in their new role after the Shuttle Program ended.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-29547\" title=\"FRR Slide for STS-133, via L2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/A319.jpg\" alt=\"FRR Slide for STS-133, via L2\" width=\"334\" height=\"256\">All nine of the last SSMEs to fly with the Space Shuttle performed admirably, with Discovery flying Main Engine 1 (ME-1) \u2013 serial number 2044, ME-2 \u2013 2048 and ME-3 \u2013 2058 during her final mission, STS-133.<\/p>\n<p>For Endeavour\u2019s swansong, ME-1 \u2013 2059, ME-2 \u2013 2061, and ME-3 \u2013 2057 helped begin the flight phase of the successful STS-134 mission, while Atlantis closed out the Space Shuttle Program, flying with engines ME-1 \u2013 2047, ME-2 \u2013 2060 and ME-3 \u2013 2045 during STS-135.<\/p>\n<p>A total of 15 RS-25Ds left the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) for their new role, arriving at the Stennis Space Center in 2012.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-29548\" title=\"The A-1 Test Stand with SLS core\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Z34.jpg\" alt=\"The A-1 Test Stand with SLS core\" width=\"349\" height=\"230\">While testing has been ongoing on the J-2X Upper Stage engine, Stennis engineers are now working on building and installing a new 7,755-pound thrust frame adapter for the A-1 Test Stand, in order to enable testing of the RS-25s ahead of their role on SLS\u2019 core.<\/p>\n<p>The reason for the new adaptor relates to the requirement of different types of engines. On the test stand, the adapter is attached to the thrust measurement system, with the engine then attached to the adapter, which must hold the engine in place and absorb the thrust produced during a test, while allowing accurate measurement of the engine performance.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-29549\" title=\"RS-25 with the adaptor\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Z43.jpg\" alt=\"RS-25 with the adaptor\" width=\"349\" height=\"233\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Z43.jpg 349w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Z43-263x175.jpg 263w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 349px) 100vw, 349px\">The adaptor that is currently installed on the A-1 Test Stand is specific for the J-2X \u2013 an engine capable producing 294,000 pounds of thrust. It can\u2019t be used for the RS-25, given that engine is much more powerful, with the ability to produce approximately 530,000 pounds of thrust.<\/p>\n<p>The design \u2013 produced by NASA, Lockheed Martin Test Operations Contract Group and Jacobs Technology \u2013 took several considerations into account, such as specific stresses on the equipment as an engine is fired and then gimbaled during a test.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s a challenging project,\u201d noted Kent Morris, RS-25 project manager for Jacobs Technology. \u201cIt\u2019s similar to the J-2X adapter project, but larger. It will take considerable man hours to perform the welding and machining needed on the material. The material used for the engine mounting block alone is 32 inches in diameter and 20 inches thick.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The installation is set to take place in November, once the Test Stand has completed J-2X gimbal testing.<\/p>\n<p>SLS will naturally evolve after the opening flights of the Block I SLS, with SSME contractor Pratt &amp; Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) set to produce RS-25E engines for the rest of the SLS\u2019 lifetime. The RS-25E is expendable and thus requires less long-life hardware items, in turn making it cheaper to produce.<\/p>\n<p>(Images:&nbsp;Via L2 content from&nbsp;L2\u2019s SLS specific L2 section, which includes, presentations, videos, graphics and internal \u2013 interactive with actual SLS engineers \u2013 updates&nbsp;on the SLS and HLV, available on no other site. Other images via NASA)<\/p>\n<p>(L2 is \u2013 as it has been for the past several years \u2013 providing full exclusive SLS&nbsp; and Exploration Planning coverage. &nbsp;To join L2, click here:&nbsp;http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/l2\/)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following a 30 year career with the Space Shuttle Program, Pratt &amp; Whitney Rocketdyne\u2019s RS-25 engines are now preparing for their next role, with the Space Launch System (SLS). Tests involving the former Space Shuttle Main Engines (SSMEs) will begin at the Stennis Space Center in 2014. RS-25: The SSME has provided safe flight for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":30298,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[9110,9111,9034,624,8116,8091],"class_list":["post-39833","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-a-1","tag-ares-v","tag-hlv","tag-sls","tag-ssme","tag-stennis"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39833"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39833"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39833\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30298"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39833"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39833"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39833"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}