{"id":39875,"date":"2013-04-13T19:05:38","date_gmt":"2013-04-13T11:05:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/sls-smat-the-mini-me-version-of-the-monster-rocket\/"},"modified":"2013-04-13T19:05:38","modified_gmt":"2013-04-13T11:05:38","slug":"sls-smat-the-mini-me-version-of-the-monster-rocket","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/sls-smat-the-mini-me-version-of-the-monster-rocket\/","title":{"rendered":"SLS SMAT: The Mini-Me version of the monster rocket"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) is constructing a scaled version of the Space Launch System (SLS), ahead of test firing it later this year. Known as the Scale Model Acoustic Test (SMAT), the mini-version of the SLS will have functioning rockets mimicking both the core engines and boosters.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\nSLS SMAT:<\/p>\n<p>Continuing the heritage of testing future launch vehicles at the scale model level, NASA engineers have test fired scaled versions of rockets to gain data on the acoustic environments endured during ignition and launch.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"widget-title penci-border-arrow\">See Also<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>SLS Forum Section<\/li>\n<li>L2 SLS Section<\/li>\n<li>L2 FRR Section<\/li>\n<li>Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The primary source of the acoustic field is the fluctuating turbulence in the mixing region of the rocket exhaust flow \u2013 known as Engine Generated Acoustics.<\/p>\n<p>Engine generated noise is a function of the exhaust flow parameters, launch stand configuration, and to a lesser extent atmospheric conditions.<\/p>\n<p>Preliminary estimates of the engine generated acoustics at a specified location on the vehicle can be determined by scaling measured acoustic data from previous launch vehicle programs, taking into account the above mentioned flow, configuration, and atmospheric parameters.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-28815\" title=\"The 6.4 Percent Scale Shuttle, via L2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/A24.jpg\" alt=\"The 6.4 Percent Scale Shuttle, via L2\" width=\"359\" height=\"275\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/A24.jpg 359w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/A24-350x268.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 359px) 100vw, 359px\">A better definition of the lift-off acoustic environment can be determined from hot fire testing of dynamically scaled models of the launch vehicle and stand.<\/p>\n<p>Spaceflight<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>NASA mission patches<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Space Shuttle<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>During the Space Shuttle development program, a 6.4 percent scale model of the launch vehicle, propulsion system, launch stand, and exhaust duct system with water suppression was used to refine the analytical\/scaling estimates of the lift-off acoustic environment.<\/p>\n<p>The resulting data provides a very useful template for the full scale rocket, although final verification of the environment is only fully provided by full static firings or launches of the actual vehicle.<\/p>\n<p>Notably, the debut launch of the Space Shuttle Program (SSP) \u2013 with Columbia on STS-1 \u2013 showed the importance of understanding the acoustic environments, as the orbiter\u2019s heat shield was damaged when an overpressure wave from the SRBs caused a forward RCS oxidizer strut to fail. Her body flap was also pushed five degrees out of position.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-28816\" title=\"STS-129 FRR Evaluation Slide, via L2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/A221.jpg\" alt=\"STS-129 FRR Evaluation Slide, via L2\" width=\"359\" height=\"253\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/A221.jpg 359w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/A221-350x247.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 359px) 100vw, 359px\">The subject was also raised during STS-129\u2019s Flight Readiness Review (FRR), as a potential issue with a very small area of the orbiter \u2013 known as a stinger attach point between the RCS and OMS Pod \u2013 raised concerns that recent acoustic environment analysis of the Space Shuttle Main Engines (SSMEs) during ignition could cause stressing that potentially leads to cracks in the attach pins\/stinger.<\/p>\n<p>Although those concerns were based on old and overly conservative data, managers showed their usual due diligence in gathering an array of updated information, via new computational models, borescope inspections on the fleet, and the installation of sensors in the area in question \u2013 all of which would be used to completely allay the potential fear of life fatigue on the stinger.<\/p>\n<p>Click here for FRR Articles: http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/tag\/frr\/<\/p>\n<p>Notably, the FRR presentations noted they lacked key historical data, given the 6.4 percent model tested during the 1970s only fired motors that mimicked the Solid Rocket Boosters and not the SSMEs, while Main Engine Ignition (MEI) Acoustic &amp; SSME Ignition Overpressure (IOP) Environment data was classed as \u201ccontinually evolving\u201d during the 30 years of the program \u2013 leading to the concern ahead of STS-129.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-28817\" title=\"ASMAT With Ares I model\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Z46.jpg\" alt=\"ASMAT With Ares I model\" width=\"348\" height=\"237\">The vehicle that was set to replace the Space Shuttle, Ares I, also underwent IOP testing \u2013 with the Ares I Scale Model Acoustics Test (ASMAT) tested during 2010.<\/p>\n<p>Numerous tests, each using a different pad configuration \u2013 such as with and without water bags within the launch mount \u2013 were conducted at MSFC.<\/p>\n<p>Quick look test results indicated that the overall noise levels measured on the vehicle were within predicted ranges and the data compared favorably between the firings. However, Ares I was cancelled shortly after the ASMAT firings.<\/p>\n<p>With the SLS now providing the role of NASA\u2019s flagship launch vehicle, the Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle (HLV) will enjoy its turn on the test stand for the acoustic environmental tests \u2013 known as Scale Model Acoustic Test (SMAT).<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-28818\" title=\"SMAT Sound Suppression System, via L2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Z54.jpg\" alt=\"SMAT Sound Suppression System, via L2\" width=\"348\" height=\"267\">Work begin in 2012 at Marshall\u2019s test stand 116, with the construction of a working water-based sound suppression system.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis water system will be used during the planned hot fire testing series that is planned for SMAT, which utilizes small-scale solid rocket Boosters and Lox-Hydrogen thrusters,\u201d noted L2\u2019s rolling SLS updates.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBased on discussions with NASA\/KSC Ground Systems Development and Operations (GSDO) engineers, MSFC is satisfied that this properly represents the water flow rates and coverage of the full-scale system and will meet the test needs for SMAT.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Click here for SLS Articles: http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/tag\/hlv\/<\/p>\n<p>As with the tests on the previous vehicles, the data will provide a good baseline ahead of the actual SLS firing into life later this decade.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-28819\" title=\"SLS SMAT, via L2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Z76.jpg\" alt=\"SLS SMAT, via L2\" width=\"351\" height=\"255\">Notably, the SMAT will involve the most technically advanced sub-scale rocket used on such a test.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIgnition overpressure (IOP) is a significant transient low-frequency pressure event caused by the rapid pressure rise rate of the solid rocket motor,\u201d opened an extensive presentation on the SMAT (L2). \u201cLift-off acoustics (LOA) noise is caused by the supersonic steady jet flow interaction with surrounding atmosphere and launch complex, persisting for 0-20 seconds as the vehicle lifts off.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cScale Model Acoustic Test (SMAT) objectives: Verify predicted LOA environments, obtain data to update the lift-off acoustic environments. Verify predicted IOP environments, obtain data for use in IOP analytical models for updated environments, and improve IOP analytical models.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cVerify SLS deflector design. Characterize Ground Acoustic (GA) environments, provide data to support GA environment predictions. Obtain Spatial Correlation (SC) data for use in vibro-acoustic models. Obtain data for Computation Fluid Dynamics (CFD) validation, and evaluate water sound suppression systems, determine water suppression attenuation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-28821\" title=\"SMAT Thruster Dev, via L2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Z9.jpg\" alt=\"SMAT Thruster Dev, via L2\" width=\"350\" height=\"240\">Obviously, engineers won\u2019t be able to literally scale down the SLS\u2019 RS-25 main engines or five segment SRBs, so alternative motors will be used on the SMAT model.<\/p>\n<p>As such, two Rocket-Assisted Take Off (RATO) motors will simulate SLS boosters, with the test requirement calling for the motors ignite simultaneously, as the SRBs would during launch.<\/p>\n<p>Testing has already begun on the small thrusters that will provide the role of the four RS-25 liquid main engines on the core.<\/p>\n<p>A single thruster \u2013 similar to vintage hardware originally designed in the 1960\u2019s and tested during the Space Shuttle program \u2013 successfully met all test objectives during Phase I scale model acoustic testing last year at Marshall\u2019s Test Stand 115.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-28820\" title=\"All four thrusters firing, via L2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Z84.jpg\" alt=\"All four thrusters firing, via L2\" width=\"349\" height=\"239\">Fabrication then began for a \u201cfourthruster cluster\u201d set, mirroring the four RS-25s that will power all versions of SLS\u2019 core stage.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHot-fire testing was initiated for the thrusters that will simulate the Core Stage Engines for the Scale Model Acoustic Test (SMAT). All four thrusters have been tested together for the first time in a single cluster in the same configuration that will be used for the Core Stage of the SMAT model,\u201d added SLS\u2019 rolling update section (L2).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTesting is being conducted at Test stand 115 in the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) East Test area. The first start ignition test was conducted on March 7, 2013. Two low thrust main stage tests were conducted on March 8, 2013. All test hardware is in excellent condition so far and (will continue testing during the Spring).\u201d<\/p>\n<p>When the actual SMAT model is completed and integrated on the test pad, a number of tests can be expected, not least because the maximum lift-off acoustic environment during an SLS launch will not be endured in the vehicle starting position, but at some elevation above the Mobile Launcher.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-28822\" title=\"SMAT\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Z10.jpg\" alt=\"SMAT\" width=\"352\" height=\"219\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Z10.jpg 352w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Z10-350x218.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 352px) 100vw, 352px\">As such, tests will probably attempt to simulate a lift-off, without the SMAT model actually launching.<\/p>\n<p>For the Ares I Scale Modelling Acoustic Tests, the vehicle model was set at a number of fixed elevations for individual test firings, these being 0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 feet. Based on the scale of the ASMAT, these distances corresponded to full-scale elevations of 0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 feet.<\/p>\n<p>Also, as expected, the test vehicle will be heavily instrumented, with five primary instrumentation suites resulting in over 325 sensors on the SMAT rocket.<\/p>\n<p>It will be outfitted with B&amp;K 4944-B microphones, pressure transducers on the tower\/mobile launcher. It will include far field measurement devices, accelerometers, thermocouples and strain gauges on vehicle, thermocouples, flow meters and chamber pressure instrumentation.<\/p>\n<p>The first test fire is expected to take place either in the summer of fall of this year.<\/p>\n<p>(NSF and L2 are continuing to provide the most extensive and exclusive SLS coverage. To join L2, support the site and access a huge database of content, click here: http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/l2\/)<\/p>\n<p>Please remember to use the below social media options to share this article with your friends to get them interested in the nuts and bolts of space flight.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) is constructing a scaled version of the Space Launch System (SLS), ahead of test firing it later this year. Known as the Scale Model Acoustic Test (SMAT), the mini-version of the SLS will have functioning rockets mimicking both the core engines and boosters. SLS SMAT: Continuing the heritage of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":30314,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[8906,624,9065,7806,8116],"class_list":["post-39875","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-msfc","tag-sls","tag-smat","tag-srb","tag-ssme"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39875"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39875"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39875\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30314"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39875"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39875"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39875"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}