{"id":39936,"date":"2013-01-10T17:01:27","date_gmt":"2013-01-10T09:01:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/spacex-crewed-dragon-pressing-home-the-advantage\/"},"modified":"2013-01-10T17:01:27","modified_gmt":"2013-01-10T09:01:27","slug":"spacex-crewed-dragon-pressing-home-the-advantage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/spacex-crewed-dragon-pressing-home-the-advantage\/","title":{"rendered":"SpaceX Crewed Dragon: Pressing home the advantage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>With all three Commercial Crew partners providing a status update at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) this week, SpaceX have outlined their path towards launching a crew on their Dragon spacecraft in 2015. With the advantage of already flying cargo missions on a near-human rated Dragon, SpaceX are leading the drive to return domestic crew launch capability to the United States.\n<\/p>\n<p>SpaceX Crewed Path:<\/p>\n<p>The latest Dragon spacecraft is currently preparing for its third flight to the International Space Station (ISS) under their Commercial Resupply Services (CRS) contract with NASA.<\/p>\n<p>This next flight (CRS-2\/SpX-2) \u2013 scheduled to launch at 10:10am on March 1 from Cape Canaveral \u2013 will be carrying critical supplies to the orbital outpost, ahead of completing its mission by providing what is now the rare commodity of downmass capability for returning hardware and experiments.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-27663\" title=\"Advanced screenshot of the failure via L2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/Z33-350x237.jpg\" alt=\"Advanced screenshot of the failure via L2\" width=\"350\" height=\"237\">The mission is pending a final go-ahead from NASA, after SpaceX briefed the agency\u2019s Mike Suffredini and William Gerstenmaier on what is now understood to be a confirmed root cause of the Engine 1 failure during Falcon 9\u2019s previous launch with the CRS-1 (SpX-1) Dragon.<\/p>\n<p>The first stage issue related one of the nine Merlin 1C engines, after \u2013 it is understood \u2013 the fuel dome above the nozzle ruptured. The engine did not explode, but did cause the fairing that protects the engine from aerodynamic loads to rupture and fall away from the vehicle due to the engine pressure release.<\/p>\n<p>According to SpaceX\u2019s Commercial Crew project manager, Garrett Reisman, some details into the root cause of the failure will be revealed to the public in the coming weeks. However, due to the proprietary nature of SpaceX\u2019s hardware, only SpaceX \u2013 and their customer, NASA \u2013 will ever get to see the full overview from the joint CRS-1 Post-Flight Investigation Board report.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"widget-title penci-border-arrow\">See Also<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>SpaceX General Section<\/li>\n<li>L2 SpaceX Section<\/li>\n<li>L2 ISS Section<\/li>\n<li>Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The results are also likely to include details of the second issue, relating to the upper stage that failed a propellant mass check at SECO-1, resulting in its secondary payload passenger \u2013 an Orbcomm satellite \u2013 being left in an unworkable orbit, prior to deorbiting.<\/p>\n<p>Space Technology<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Aerospace &amp; Defense<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>NASA educational resources<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>The key to the continued confidence NASA have in SpaceX comes via the success of the primary mission objectives, as Dragon behaved well on orbit and suffered no ill effects of its launch vehicle having a tantrum during the ride uphill.<\/p>\n<p>With the Dragon that is already flying being a vehicle that is partly crew-rated already, SpaceX are working a parallel process to their current campaigns to complete the drive that will fully enable their spacecraft to safely carry astronauts to the ISS.<\/p>\n<p>This process is currently in the Commercial Crew integrated Capability (CCiCAP) stage, maturing from the Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) process that has resulted in three companies earning NASA money to bring their spacecraft up to spec for NASA astronauts.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-27664\" title=\"Part of the FPIP Chart - Via L2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/Z231.jpg\" alt=\"Part of the FPIP Chart - Via L2\" width=\"349\" height=\"281\">However, as reported by NASASpaceflight.com\u2019s Pete Harding, it is unlikely that any NASA astronauts will get to ride on a commercial vehicle until late 2016 \u2013 as shown in ISS Flight Planning Integration Panel (FPIP) charts (available on L2) on the current plan for ISS crew rotations using what are tagged as USCVs (US Commercial Vehicles).<\/p>\n<p>According to the FPIP chart, the first USCV will launch in December 2016, for a docking to the Node 2 Forward port \u2013 via the use of an ISS Docking Adapter (IDA) attached to PMA-2. A Soyuz spacecraft is also pencilled in for the same date as a back-up (all USCVs on the chart have Soyuz back-ups assigned, should the USCV not be available).<\/p>\n<p>The USCV will carry four crewmembers, meaning that once it docks to the ISS, the crew of the station will be boosted to seven \u2013 allowing significant extra research activities to be performed. However, one of the crewmembers on the USCV will be Russian \u2013 just as one American crewmember will continue to be rotated on the Soyuz.<\/p>\n<p>This is done in order to ensure that a US crewmember is always present on the ISS, even when no USCV is docked to the station. It is not known at this point whether the seat on the USCV will be provided to Russia in exchange for a US seat on the Soyuz.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-27665\" title=\"Fake Crew on Dragon\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/Z20.jpg\" alt=\"Fake Crew on Dragon\" width=\"349\" height=\"228\">Per the commercial crew update briefing, only SpaceX have said they will be able to conduct crew launches as early as 2015 \u2013 meaning the crew will be selected in-house, as opposed to being assigned by NASA.<\/p>\n<p>This \u201ccrew ability\u201d date is based on the milestones laid out past the current range of objectives currently provided through to the end of the CCiCAP phase in 2014, allowing for a notional forward roadmap based on the projections per company.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe laid out a plan that gets us to flying the first test flight in the middle of 2015, followed by flying a crew to the ISS by the end of 2015,\u201d noted Mr Reisman. \u201cThat would be done with a test pilot crew.<\/p>\n<p>Click here for recent Dragon Articles:&nbsp;http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/tag\/dragon\/<\/p>\n<p>\u201c(However,) because this would be done prior to final (NASA) certification, we are not legally allowed to use NASA astronauts to be part of that test pilot crew \u2013 so it will be SpaceX test pilots for that crew. We\u2019re not selling tickets, so don\u2019t call our toll-free number.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mr Reisman, a two-time Shuttle astronaut, intimated he is not interested in becoming one of the test crew.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-27661\" title=\"Dragon using the SuperDracos\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/Z141-350x236.jpg\" alt=\"Dragon using the SuperDracos\" width=\"350\" height=\"236\">In order to get to the promised land of being the first commercial company to launch humans to the ISS, several key elements of the Dragon spacecraft require development \u2013 not least the Launch Abort System (LAS).<\/p>\n<p>Dragon sports a series of eight liquid SuperDraco engines, built into the side walls of the Dragon spacecraft, capable of producing up to 120,000 pounds of axial thrust to drive the Dragon away from its failing launch vehicle.<\/p>\n<p>Advantages of the SuperDraco liquid thruster \u2013 when compared to the traditional use of solid propellent \u2013 includes how the engine can be put through a series of throttling ranges, in turn allowing for redundancy, with SpaceX claiming they could lose one of the eight abort engines and still recover the vehicle and crew successfully. The engines can also be restarted multiple times.<\/p>\n<p>Another advantage is the fact it\u2019s not a tower system, which normally requires jettison shortly after first stage flight. Any failure of this key sequence of ascent would end the mission, given the flight profile wouldn\u2019t be designed for carrying the LAS along for the ride.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-27662\" title=\"SuperDraco being tested\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/Z13.jpg\" alt=\"SuperDraco being tested\" width=\"349\" height=\"229\">Because the system is integrated into the Dragon itself \u2013 as opposed to departing the spacecraft during jettison \u2013 the spacecraft can technically abort within much longer periods than the tower version. With Dragon returning with the engines on board, they can also be reused on future launches.<\/p>\n<p>There is also a large amount of commonality between the 18 maneuvering engines built into Dragon and the SuperDraco LAS engines \u2013 bar the fact the SuperDraco engines would burn through propellant 200 times faster.<\/p>\n<p>The additional applications of these thrusters, when unused during a nominal mission \u2013 is the ability for them to enable a return to a landing strip on land. This is a key goal as part of the fully reusable launch system SpaceX are working on, along with the potential use for landing on exploration missions, such as the surface of Mars.<\/p>\n<p>A large amount of testing has already been conducted via the CCDev-2 portion of the Commercial Crew association with NASA, with the CCiCAP phase taking this literally to new heights.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-27660\" title=\"In Flight Abort Test\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/Z15.jpg\" alt=\"In Flight Abort Test\" width=\"349\" height=\"245\">First up will be the Pad Abort Test Review in March of this year, a key review ahead of a detailed plan \u2013 expected in the summer. The actual pad abort test itself will take place in December, resulting in a full-up Falcon 9 and Dragon being integrated on the Cape Canaveral launch site, prior to aborting the Dragon from the pad for a full test.<\/p>\n<p>During the year, reviews will take place into the second abort test, which will result in a Falcon 9 with Dragon launching as per usual, prior to aborting at the \u201cworst possible time\u201d during ascent. That \u201cIn Flight Abort Test\u201d is expected in April of 2014.<\/p>\n<p>Large amounts of work will continue with upgrading the flight systems, ranging from displays to the crew to the implementation of the Merlin 1D on the upgraded&nbsp;Falcon 9.<\/p>\n<p>However, SpaceX do not lack the drive to push foward with their human space flight ambitions, not least because their founder, Elon Musk, wants to be on a SpaceX flight to Mars while he\u2019s still young enough.<\/p>\n<p>(Images: via L2\u2019s SpaceX Dragon Mission Special Sections \u2013 Containing presentations, videos, images (Over 2,500MB in size), space industry member discussion and more. Now includes CRS-1 Image Dump, every single hi res photo taken from the ISS \u2013 350 Hi Res images&nbsp;\u2013 of which produced the lead image for this article).<\/p>\n<p>(Click here: http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/l2\/ \u2013 to view how you can support NSF and access the best space flight content on the entire internet).<\/p>\n<p>(Don\u2019t forget to share this article with your friends by using the new social buttons directly below):<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With all three Commercial Crew partners providing a status update at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) this week, SpaceX have outlined their path towards launching a crew on their Dragon spacecraft in 2015. With the advantage of already flying cargo missions on a near-human rated Dragon, SpaceX are leading the drive to return domestic crew [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":30314,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[8996,4055,2304,1395,479,316],"class_list":["post-39936","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-ccdev","tag-ccicap","tag-crs","tag-dragon","tag-falcon-9","tag-spacex"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39936"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39936"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39936\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30314"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39936"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39936"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39936"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}