{"id":40091,"date":"2012-06-14T20:39:26","date_gmt":"2012-06-14T12:39:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/nasa-teams-evaluating-iss-built-exploration-platform-roadmap\/"},"modified":"2012-06-14T20:39:26","modified_gmt":"2012-06-14T12:39:26","slug":"nasa-teams-evaluating-iss-built-exploration-platform-roadmap","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/nasa-teams-evaluating-iss-built-exploration-platform-roadmap\/","title":{"rendered":"NASA teams evaluating ISS-built Exploration Platform roadmap"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>NASA\u2019s Human Architecture Team (HAT) are coming to the conclusion of their support activity phase for what could be the major focal point for exploring deep space destinations. The Exploration Gateway\/Platform \u2013 constructed from international modules at the ISS, before being deployed to EML2 \u2013 would see greater involvement from \u201cexisting launchers\u201d in building the staging ground for missions to the Moon, Asteroids and Mars.<\/p>\n<p>The Current Plan:<\/p>\n<p>Several documented dates for the completion of an exploration roadmap have come and gone over the last several months, mainly due \u2013 it is claimed \u2013 to the uncertainty with NASA\u2019s long term budget projections.<\/p>\n<p>However, a baseline of sorts does exist, mainly via the opening options created by the Exploration Systems Development (ESD) Design Reference Missions (DRM) \u2013 as outlined in the Space Launch System (SLS) Concept Of Operations (Con Ops) document, available in&nbsp;L2&nbsp;(L2 Link).<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-24827\" title=\"Z76\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Z76.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"347\" height=\"224\">The most solid element of the plan is the 2017 launch of the Space Launch System (SLS), with an uncrewed Orion, for a system validation\/certification of the vehicles during a full mission.<\/p>\n<p>The mission itself is called Exploration Mission -1 (EM-1) \u2013 carefully worded as the \u201cNotional Mission for Orion First Flight in 2017: Uncrewed Beyond-Earth Orbit (BEO) Demonstration\u201d flight, resulting in the debut of the Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle (HLV) in its 70mt Block 1 configuration.<\/p>\n<p>Launching Orion into an high-apogee orbit of 975 nmi at the insertion point, the kick stage\/ICPS (Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage) \u2013 a Delta Cryogenic Second Stage (DCSS) \u2013 would then conduct the Trans Lunar Injection (TLI) burn(s) to send Orion towards a date with the Moon.<\/p>\n<p>The seven to 10 day mission would come to a conclusion with Orion parachuting to a splashdown in the Pacific Ocean, for what would be its second such return, following the Exploration Flight Test (EFT-1) demo in 2014.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"widget-title penci-border-arrow\">See Also<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>SLS Forum Section<\/li>\n<li>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle <\/li>\n<li>L2 SLS Section<\/li>\n<li>L2 Orion Section<\/li>\n<li>Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The current plan then sees a four year gap before the next flight of the SLS, in 2021, known as Exploration Mission -2 (EM-2). This is an almost carbon copy of EM-1, except this time the mission is crewed for the trip around the Moon.<\/p>\n<p>While this four year gap is painfully uninspiring, the rest of the current plan is painfully undefined, with NASA leadership continuing to use an almost scripted line of \u201cheading to an asteroid in the mid 2020s, followed by Mars in the mid 2030s\u201c.<\/p>\n<p>It is likely such leaders are unable to say any more, given the political direction they have to abide by, and the impossibility of setting specific targets and dates that range decades \u2013 and many administrations \u2013 into the future.<\/p>\n<p>The Developing Plan:<\/p>\n<p>While EM-1 remains solid on the forecast, not least due to the requirement of validating SLS and Orion in deep space, source notes (See L2 Exploration Roadmap Section \u2013 L2 LINK) over recent months have portrayed a continuing sea change towards a more exciting approach that marries existing capability with the future exploration aspirations.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-24828\" title=\"Z3\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Z38.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"350\" height=\"220\">Mainly referred to as the Exploration Gateway \u2013 but also known as the Exploration Platform or L2 Waypoint \u2013 the concept calls for the launch of several modules for construction at the International Space Station (ISS), prior to departing to Earth-Moon Lagrange (EML) point 2, located on the far side of the Moon, serving as a deep space outpost.<\/p>\n<p>Several conceptual versions of the Gateway have been complied since it first started to gain mentions in the Exploration debate last year. However, the concepts that involve the use of a large amount of existing hardware are understood to be the most viable, with costs further mitigated by the use of existing launchers to loft the hardware to the ISS.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUsing existing hardware and the ISS infrastructure provides a flexible and affordable way to demonstrate technologies and build a deep space Exploration Platform in the near term,\u201d noted one presentation on the ISS construction element of the Gateway.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-24832\" title=\"Z5\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Z55.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"352\" height=\"223\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Z55.jpg 352w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Z55-350x222.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 352px) 100vw, 352px\">The existing hardware would involve an orbiter external airlock, an MPLM (Multi-Purpose Logistics Module) habitat module, and an international module, linked by the Node 4\/DHS (Docking Hub System) at the orbital outpost.<\/p>\n<p>The hardware would be launched on a flexible timeline, allowing for the initial assembly &amp; checkout period and boost &amp; initial crew periods to be phased to match resources.<\/p>\n<p>With the modules ranging from only 11mt to 13mt in mass, most Exploration Platform concepts cite the use of existing launch vehicles for lofting the hardware to the ISS.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAtlas V medium (5X1 series) performance suited to estimated module mass,\u201d cited one presentation. \u201cAugmentation for orbital operations (Launch Mission Kit) estimated mass is approximately 3mt. Centaur upper stage provides flexible accommodations for kit.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-24829\" title=\"Z4\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Z47.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"349\" height=\"241\">It was also shown that the capability is based on a payload to 51.6 deg inclination, 407km circular orbit. However, given expendable vehicle systems normally have short mission durations, launching these elements will require augmentation with a Launch Mission Kit (LMK), as covered by one presentation to the Future In-Space Operations Colloquium (FISO) last year.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLaunch Mission Kit expands the functionality of the payload attach structure. Additional thrusters, propellant, and pressurization tanks to provide 6 DOF control. Computer systems for spacecraft control. Solar arrays and batteries for spacecraft power and keep alive power to element being flown.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLMK shares functionality with the Centaur. Functions are separated to maintain existing launch vehicle qualification.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A Russian Proton was also shown as a potential candidate to launch the international module. Plus, it is understood&nbsp;NASA managers have discussed the Exploration Platform with ISS partners, gaining positive responses.<\/p>\n<p>With the ability to launch, assemble and checkout the Exploration Platform at the ISS, the next challenge would be to deploy it to its EML2 destination.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-24830\" title=\"Z416\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Z4161.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"352\" height=\"266\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Z4161.jpg 352w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Z4161-350x264.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 352px) 100vw, 352px\">While FISO note a Space Tug could be used, the growing preference is to use a Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) system, with big hitters such as Boeing and Aerojet openly supporting such an option for the Exploration Platform.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe believe that Aerojet\u2019s current Solar Electric Propulsion technology, such as that used to rescue the AEHF satellite, is immediately applicable to a key role in Human Space,\u201d noted Julie Van Kleeck, Aerojet Vice President, Space &amp; Launch System in an interview with NASASpaceflight.com earlier this year.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor example, a 25-40 kW SEP vehicle using current technology can pre-position a human-tended habitat at L-2 to support initial Orion missions. This approach would provide an immediate deep space destination for astronauts, and L-2 is an excellent way-station to the rest of the solar system.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-24831\" title=\"Z45\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Z451.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"350\" height=\"262\">Both SLS and Boeing documentation show SEP hardware being lofted uphill by the SLS, although the latter presentations mainly refer to mission specific SEP hardware, to be used to create a Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) vehicle, a vehicle that departs from the Exploration Platform itself, using a large SEP system for the journey.<\/p>\n<p>Speculated as a potential realignment of SLS\u2019 role by sources, a move towards a platform would re-manifest SLS\u2019 missions past EM-1, potentially bringing a previously cited 2019 \u201cCargo\u201d mission on line (SLS-2), one that could be used to aid the Platform by launching the SEP module via a Block 1 vehicle, prior to a crewed mission to the Gateway itself as the SLS-3 mission in the early 2020s.<\/p>\n<p>Relevant to SLS\u2019 use, the HLV is still handed a large role in the architecture, including the FISO \u201cexisting launcher\u201d overview. Alternative concepts \u2013 citing the use of propellent depots \u2013 do exist, both with and without SLS\u2019 involvement.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-24833\" title=\"Z21\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Z211.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"347\" height=\"231\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Z211.jpg 347w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Z211-263x175.jpg 263w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 347px) 100vw, 347px\">What is known about having an Exploration Gateway staged at EML2 is how it opens up numerous destinations, such as the Lunar surface \u2013 recently added to the ESD ConOps presentation as a \u201cLunar Surface Sortie\u201d DRM, potentially expanding the overall plan into a more exciting \u201cMoon, NEA, Mars\u201d roadmap.<\/p>\n<p>Should the international element of the Platform also provide additional framework for international exploration missions, the viability of committing to such missions may also receive a boost via costs sharing and a more stable political goal, as seen via the International Space Station model.<\/p>\n<p>However, with the 2010 Authorization Act very much the law of the land \u2013 an Act that does not mention an Exploration Gateway \u2013 any changes may be sensitive at the political level.<\/p>\n<p>As such, this current effort via the HAT \u2013 as cited on documentation acquired by L2 \u2013 LINK \u2013 will likely remain only as internal planning, as opposed to an official plan, for some time to come.<\/p>\n<p>(Images:&nbsp;Via NASA, Boeing and L2 content from&nbsp;L2\u2019s SLS specific L2 section, which includes, presentations, videos, graphics and internal updates&nbsp;on the SLS and HLV, available on no other site.)<\/p>\n<p>(L2 is \u2013 as it has been for the past several years \u2013 providing full exclusive SLS&nbsp; and Exploration Planning coverage. &nbsp;To join L2, click here: http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/l2\/)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NASA\u2019s Human Architecture Team (HAT) are coming to the conclusion of their support activity phase for what could be the major focal point for exploring deep space destinations. The Exploration Gateway\/Platform \u2013 constructed from international modules at the ISS, before being deployed to EML2 \u2013 would see greater involvement from \u201cexisting launchers\u201d in building the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":30365,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[419,9034,233,624],"class_list":["post-40091","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-gateway","tag-hlv","tag-iss","tag-sls"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40091"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40091"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40091\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30365"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40091"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40091"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40091"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}