- \n
- HLV Forum Section<\/li>\n
- L2 SLS Section<\/li>\n
- L2 Future Vehicles Section<\/li>\n
- Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\u201cProvides $17.7 billion, a decrease of 0.3 percent, or $59 million, below the 2012 enacted level. While making difficult choices, the Budget builds on our existing space infrastructure, continues efforts to streamline agency operations, and preserves innovative capabilities and technologies to sustain American leadership in space,\u201d the White House overview noted.<\/p>\n
If the budget request is approved, planetary science will see a cut around the 21 percent mark \u2013 which includes NASA\u2019s withdrawal from the joint-European mission called ExoMars, and refers all Mars exploration to a strategy overview, which will be conducted over the coming months.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/B431.jpg\" "\\"B431\\"")
The NASA budget includes $4 billion for space operations and $4 billion for exploration activities in the Human Exploration Operations mission directorate, including close-out of the Space Shuttle Program, and funding for the International Space Station, $4.9 billion for science, $669 million for space technology and $552 million for aeronautics research.<\/p>\nOn face value, it appears NASA is at least attempting to show it is following the law outlined in the 2010 Authorization Act, which won majority political support and the signature of President Obama, reversing a controversial FY2011 budget proposal, and placing human exploration back to the forefront of NASA\u2019s long-term goals.<\/p>\n
SpaceX launch tickets
<\/path>NASA educational resources <\/path>Rocket building kits <\/path>\n (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n
\u201cThis budget in-sources jobs, creates capabilities here at home \u2013 and strengthens our workforce, all while opening the next great chapter in American exploration,\u201d NASA Administrator Charles Bolden proclaimed. \u201cAnd as we reach for new heights in space, we\u2019re creating new jobs right here on Earth, helping to support an economy that\u2019s built to last.\u201d<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/Z213.jpg\" "\\"Z213\\"")
Those new heights were promoted as human exploration missions to Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs) and Mars \u2013 the latter still a distant dream in the mid 2030s. Yet there wasn\u2019t any reference made by General Bolden on the exciting internal developments relating to an Exploration Gateway Platform or Lunar surface missions.<\/p>\nThe NASA leader also decided against mentioning the schedule evaluations which have noted confidence in not only debuting the SLS in 2017 \u2013 as confirmed again on Monday \u2013 but also a second mission in 2019.<\/p>\n
Instead, the NASA administrator decided to heap praise on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) \u2013 which has struggled with massive cost overruns \u2013 citing it as a flagship NASA mission, opting not to class either commercial crew, SLS, or Orion in the same bracket, whilst claiming SLS will not fly with a crew until 2021, as previously noted in the worst-case schedule scenario.<\/p>\n
Some cuts are only obvious when reading the breakdown of the Exploration section, past the Exploration Systems Development overview and into the specific totals for SLS, Orion and Commercial Crew, etc. The figures show a $175 million cut for Orion in the FY13 proposal, when compared to the authorized funds for FY2012. SLS also appeared to suffer from a cut, while Commercial Crew gains $423 million.<\/p>\n
Edit: However, there are additional funds belonging to SLS and MPCV for construction of facilities that have been put into a separate budget line item for FY2013 (Construction & Environmental Compliance and Restoration). These are $140.4m and $3.3m respectively \u2013 technically resulting in a $25m rise for SLS.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/Z312.jpg\" "\\"Z3\\"")
Regardless, a warning was issued by one of the 2010 Authorization Act architects, U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), Ranking Member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, who believes the above figures point to Commercial Crew funds benefiting from the cuts made to SLS and Orion.<\/p>\n\u201cDespite repeated assurances from NASA and White House officials that the SLS and Orion are \u2018key elements of our future strategy for human space exploration\u2019, vehicle development for the heavy lift SLS rocket and the Orion capsule is cut by hundreds of millions of dollars,\u201d noted the Senator.<\/p>\n
\u201cThese reductions will slow the development of the SLS and the Orion crew vehicle, making it impossible for them to provide backup capability for supporting the space station. The Administration remains insistent on cutting SLS and Orion to pay for commercial crew rather than accommodating both.<\/p>\n
\u201cI will once again work with my colleagues in the Congress to ensure NASA receives the funding, consistent with law passed by Congress and signed by the President, needed to preserve our leadership in space and open the doors to future exploration and missions of discovery.\u201d<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/Z103.jpg\" "\\"Z103\\"")
The potential nightmare scenario which may play out in the upcoming political evaluations could be the targeting of the Commercial Crew funding.<\/p>\nAs announced on Monday, the United States is not expecting to regain domestic crew launch capability until 2017, instead relying on the Russians to sell seats on their Soyuz to allow a continued American presence on the International Space Station (ISS) \u2013 a facility which was mainly constructed and paid for by NASA.<\/p>\n
A reduction in support for Commercial Crew could threaten to slip the schedule past 2017 \u2013 after previously tracking 2014\/2015 \u2013 leading to yet more funds being diverted to Russia for crew support.<\/p>\n
Such a scenario could then initiate SLS and Orion into the \u201cback up\u201d role \u2013 as alluded to in the 2010 Authorization Act \u2013 an undesirable situation where an overpowered launch vehicle lofts a spacecraft \u2013 designed for Beyond Earth Orbit (BEO) exploration \u2013 on Low Earth Orbit (LEO) runs to the ISS.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/Z291.jpg\" "\\"Z29\\"")
This point was raised by space policy expert Marcia Smith during a media telecon on Monday with Bill Gerstenmaier, Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations, who insisted no plans were being made at this time to use Orion in such a back up role.<\/p>\n\u201cThe focus is for us to get a redundant capability as soon as we can. In terms of using Orion for that back up capability, we\u2019re not precluding that, but we\u2019re not doing anything actively to allow that to occur,\u201d noted Mr Gerstenmaier. \u201cNASA is not doing any design work on Orion or SLS that would allow it (Orion) to go to the Station.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s not a very effective way to get to LEO. It\u2019s really designed to go to BEO, and that\u2019s where we want to stay focused on.\u201d<\/p>\n
Noting confidence in the Russian\u2019s ability to return from their woes of 2011, Mr Gerstenmaier added that any long-term issue with Soyuz would result in either the decrewing of the ISS \u2013 as was previously threatened last year \u2013 with the ISS continuing to fly unmanned \u2013 as it is capable of doing \u2013 for a period of time, and\/or attempt to accelerate a commercial crew partner.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/D52.jpg\" "\\"D52\\"")
A third scenario, involving the launch of Orion on a Delta IV-Heavy, wasn\u2019t addressed in Mr Gerstenmaier\u2019s comments. However, with Orion already booked to fly an uncrewed test mission (Exploration Test Flight -1) in 2014, the potential to provide some separation between SLS\u2019 schedule and Orion\u2019s advanced development may be available, if the Delta IV-H can be human-rated \u2013 something which sources claim can be achieved.<\/p>\nHowever, a more sensible approach of concentrating on funding support for the Commercial Crew partners remains the primary focus, should political support provide the required money to allow private industry to push forward with the development of their vehicles.<\/p>\n
This budget proposal will be evaluated by lawmakers over the coming period, hopefully without a fight breaking out between commercial crew and SLS\/Orion.<\/p>\n
(Images: NASA, ULA, US Senate and L2.)<\/p>\n
(L2 is \u2013 as it has been for the past several years \u2013 providing full exclusive SLS coverage, available no where else on the internet. To join L2, click here: http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/l2\/)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The US space agency announced a reduced FY13 budget proposal on Monday, with planetary science becoming this year\u2019s major casualty. The Space Launch System (SLS) and Orion \u2013 as exploration \u2013 also received cuts, leading to Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison issuing a warning that NASA should not cut any money from the Agency\u2019s exploration vehicles. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":29680,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[631,7796,9034,190,640,624],"class_list":["post-40202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-budget","tag-commercial","tag-hlv","tag-nasa","tag-orion","tag-sls"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40202"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40202"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40202\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29680"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}