![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/A121.jpg\" "\\"A12\\"")
Other easily identifiable areas \u2013 such as in the Apollo 17 site \u2013 include the tracks laid down by the lunar rover, along with the last foot trails left on the moon.<\/p>\nAs NASA\u2019s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) produced the sharpest images ever taken from space of the Apollo 12, 14 and 17 landing sites, NASA managers are working on internal plans to protect the \u201cheritage sites\u201d from potential damage from future visiting spacecraft \u2013 such as the Google Lunar X PRIZE (GLXP) vehicles \u2013 listing a long set of recommendations on keep-out zones.<\/p>\n
A look back into History:<\/p>\n
The amazing LRO images \u2013 now released by NASA \u2013 show details which even include the actual footprint paths made when the astronauts explored the lunar surface during the Apollo missions.<\/p>\n
Other easily identifiable areas \u2013 such as in the Apollo 17 site \u2013 include the tracks laid down by the lunar rover, along with the last foot trails left on the moon.<\/p>\n
At each site, trails also run to the west of the landers, where the astronauts placed the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) to monitor the moon\u2019s environment and interior.<\/p>\n
LRO \u2013 which was built and managed by NASA\u2019s Goddard Space Flight Center \u2013 managed to take the higher resolution photos via adjustments made to the spacecraft\u2019s orbit, which is slightly oval-shaped or elliptical.<\/p>\n
The maneuver lowered LRO from its usual altitude of approximately 31 miles (50 kilometers) to an altitude that dipped as low as nearly 13 miles (21 kilometers) as it passed over the moon\u2019s surface. The spacecraft remained in this orbit for 28 days, long enough for the moon to completely rotate.<\/p>\n
This allowed for full coverage of the surface by the LROC\u2019s Wide Angle Camera on the spacecraft.<\/p>\n
SpaceX (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n \u201cThe new low-altitude images sharpen our view of the moon\u2019s surface,\u201d said Arizona State University researcher Mark Robinson, principal investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC). \u201cA great example is the sharpness of the rover tracks at the Apollo 17 site. In previous images the rover tracks were visible, but now they are sharp parallel lines on the surface.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWithout changing the average altitude, we made the orbit more elliptical, so the lowest part of the orbit is on the sunlit side of the moon,\u201d added Goddard\u2019s John Keller, deputy LRO project scientist. \u201cThis put LRO in a perfect position to take these new pictures of the surface.\u201d<\/p>\n The cycle ended on Tuesday, resulting in the spacecraft returning to its 31-mile orbit around the Moon.<\/p>\n \u201cThese images remind us of our fantastic Apollo history and beckon us to continue to move forward in exploration of our solar system,\u201d said Jim Green, director of the Planetary Science Division at NASA Headquarters in Washington.<\/p>\n Protecting the Lunar Sites:<\/p>\n The amazing images were published just days ahead of the Delta II mission to launch GRAIL (Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory) \u2013 twin lunar satellites \u2013 to the Moon on Thursday, which lift-off scheduled for 8:37am Eastern from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS).<\/p>\n The images also arrived shortly after an expansive internal NASA presentation \u2013 available on L2 \u2013 was debated at a NASA Staff Senior meeting in August, which discussed the protection of the heritage sites from future landers and robotic vehicles.<\/p>\n The GLXP has a prize fund of $30 million available to the first privately funded teams to safely land a robot on the surface of the Moon, have that robot travel 500 meters over the lunar surface, and send video, images and data back to the Earth.<\/p>\n There are currently 29 teams working on winning the GLXP, with $20 million on offer for the winner. The targeted landing sites for these teams are located all around the lunar surface.<\/p>\n According to the NASA presentation there is scientific interest in robotic visits to the Apollo sites, allowing for the collection of data on items such as dust transportations, Micrometeorite bombardment rates, sandblasting effects, the survival of microbes and Lunar Weathering.<\/p>\n \u201cTo characterize the effects on engineered materials following four decades of exposure to the lunar environment,\u201d the presentation noted on the latter scientific item of interest.<\/p>\n However, there is a concern relating to the possible mechanisms of damage to the aforementioned \u201cscientifically interesting data\u201d as NASA worded it.<\/p>\n There are also concerns relating to robotic rovers accidentally running over the footprints created by Apollo astronauts, or contaminate a site via physical contact with heritage hardware.<\/p>\n One of the worst case scenarios listed relates to the potential of Entry, Descent and Landing (EDL) errors, resulting in a \u201ccrash or off-nominal landing near a heritage site which may produce enormous amounts of debris, dust, chemical contamination, and possible biological contamination.\u201d<\/p>\n The data \u2013 as presented in the NASA document \u2013 notes that the force creates a \u201crelatively flat sheet of dust \u2013 1-3 degrees to surface \u2013 with particles lifted by aero forces. Total eroded and scouring volume is around two metric tons in volume, with dust velocities reaching as high as 2000 meters per second.\u201d<\/p>\n Among the recommendations cited in the presentation, the arrival of future craft \u2013 such as the GLXP vehicles \u2013 should follow certain flight rules, in order to provide protection for the heritage sites.<\/p>\n \u201cThe approach path for the Descent\/Landing (D\/L) trajectory should be tangential to the D\/L boundary in order to protect the site from off-nominal descent\/landing situations,\u201d the document noted. \u201cThe visiting vehicle should ensure no overflight of the heritage sites.\u201d<\/p>\n The recommendations add additional emphasis for the Apollo 11 and Apollo 17 sites, making reference to a \u201cKeepout Zone\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cIt is recommended that the sites for Apollo 11 and 17 be treated as unique by prohibiting visits to any part of the site (and) that all vehicles remain beyond the boundaries of the entire site.<\/p>\n \u201cIt is recommended that the entire site at Apollo 11 and 17 be restricted from close inspection by visiting robotic systems. The visiting vehicle mobility exclusion boundary will encompass all artifacts (hardware, footprints, etc) for this site.\u201d<\/p>\n The exclusion zone for Apollo 11\u2019s site will result in a keep-out zone of 75 meters from the lunar module descent stage, where as the zone will extend 200-225 meters from the Apollo 17 site.<\/p>\n This additional access is shown as buffer zones, with a three meter buffer for descent stages, one meter buffer distance for the Lunar Rovers, experiments, sampling sites and flags, while no restrictions are recommended on the footprints and rover tracks outside the identified keep-out zones.<\/p>\n These buffer zones will also apply to other spacecraft, such as a one meter buffer around all Surveyor spacecraft hardware. A ruling is also provided for the expended S-IVB stage impact site.<\/p>\n \u201cRovers may drive to the rim of the crater and observe,\u201d added the presentation. \u201cEntrance into the crater may be permissible with coordination with NASA, but may not disturb any debris.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThe LRRRs should be treated as special cases with approach mobility being tangential to the site. Once within a 10 meter radius zone of the LRRR, mobility can only proceed at speeds that do not propel regolith particles forward of the rover up to the total exclusion zone of one meter radius around the retro-reflector.<\/p>\n \u201cDirect approach to the LRRR should never occur.\u201d<\/p>\n Several pages of additional rules and allowances are listed for landers in the hopper configuration, along with the potential that the GLXP missions may provide additional science opportunities and data to use in refining their rulings.<\/p>\n As such, NASA class the recommendations as an evolving document, based on early, small landers with imaging only. Such lander capabilities are likely to advance over the short-term.<\/p>\n Forward work will also include analysis on rocket exhaust interaction with the lunar regolith to attempt to reduce the D\/L distance.<\/p>\n (Images: Via the NASA Presentation \u2013 available in L2, NASA images via the LRO photo release. The lunar landing site map is originally available here: http:\/\/evadot.com\/glxplandingsites\/)<\/p>\n (As the shuttle fleet retire, NSF and L2 are providing full transition level coverage, available no where else on the internet, from Orion and SLS to ISS and COTS\/CRS\/CCDEV, to European and Russian vehicles. <\/p>\n (Click here to join L2: http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/l2\/ )<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" As NASA\u2019s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) produced the sharpest images ever taken from space of the Apollo 12, 14 and 17 landing sites, NASA managers are working on internal plans to protect the \u201cheritage sites\u201d from potential damage from future visiting spacecraft \u2013 such as the Google Lunar X PRIZE (GLXP) vehicles \u2013 listing a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":29561,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4177,4165,625],"class_list":["post-40332","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-glxp","tag-lro","tag-moon"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40332"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40332"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40332\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29561"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40332"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40332"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40332"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}See Also<\/h4>\n
\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/A44.jpg\" "\\"A4\\"")
Such new arrivals in the near future include private robotic landers, such as those competing for the Google Lunar X PRIZE (GLXP) \u2013 as heavily referenced in the associated NASA presentation.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/A65.jpg\" "\\"A6\\"")
Fears include the proximity of landing, liftoff and flyover from a future landing\/robotic vehicle, where rocket thrust may erase footprints and treads, sandblast nearby hardware and cause deposition of chemicals\/dust.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/A71.jpg\" "\\"A7\\"")
Some data is already at hand via the actual Apollo missions, such as the \u201cPlume\/Ejecta particle analysis for Lunar Descent Engines\u201d findings, which show the descent engines create a high velocity of horizontal flow across the lunar surface.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/A91.jpg\" "\\"A9\\"")
As such, NASA created a set of recommendations for preserving\/protecting the USG Lunar Artifacts, relating to three categories, ranging from the six Apollo sites, the unmanned soft-landing sites of Surveyor and Luna, and through to the impact\/crash sites of Ranger and the expended S-IVB stages.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/A84.jpg\" "\\"A8\\"")
\u201cWhile all the Apollo sites represent significant historical\/heritage value in the material culture, the Apollo 11 and 17 landing sites carry special significance,\u201d added the presentation.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/A102.jpg\" "\\"A10\\"")
However, for the Apollo 12, 14, 15 and 16 sites, more access should be provided to individual components and artifacts, NASA added, allowing for future robotic missions to get within touching distance of Apollo hardware \u2013 as much as they won\u2019t be allowed physical contact.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/A112.jpg\" "\\"A11\\"")
An additional note on the restrictions at the Apollo 12, 14-16 sites, is also listed, relating to the Laser Ranging Retro-Reflectors (LRRRs), which the presentation notes should be carefully preserved.<\/p>\n