{"id":40395,"date":"2011-07-11T00:01:26","date_gmt":"2011-07-10T16:01:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/sts-135-atlantis-docks-with-the-iss-wleids-review-on-rcc-panels\/"},"modified":"2011-07-11T00:01:26","modified_gmt":"2011-07-10T16:01:26","slug":"sts-135-atlantis-docks-with-the-iss-wleids-review-on-rcc-panels","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/sts-135-atlantis-docks-with-the-iss-wleids-review-on-rcc-panels\/","title":{"rendered":"STS-135: Atlantis docks with the ISS \u2013 WLEIDS review on RCC panels"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Atlantis has docked to the International Space Station (ISS) \u2013 one final time \u2013 following an emotional R-Bar Pitch Maneuver (RPM) and text book approach to the orbital outpost. Her mission performance continues to be exemplary, as the Damage Assessment Team review the health of the&nbsp;Thermal Protection System, in tandem with data from the orbiter\u2019s Wing Leading Edge Impact Detection System (WLEIDS).<\/p>\n<p>\nSTS-135 Update:\n<\/p>\n<p>This was Atlantis\u2019 19th docking to a Space Station \u2013 based on a total of seven dockings to the Russian space station MIR, and 12 to ISS \u2013 placing her in history as the single vehicle with the most space station dockings.<\/p>\n<p>This was also the 36th docking of Shuttle to ISS and occurred on the 37th Shuttle mission to ISS (STS-88\/Endeavour did not dock to ISS \u2013 after that mission involved the maneuvering of Unity onto the ODS (Orbiter Docking System) with the SRMS (Shuttle Remote Manipulator System) before grappling the Russian module already in orbit and mating it to Unity).<\/p>\n<p>The crew awoke ahead of a busy Flight Day 3 to Mr Blue Sky by the Electric Light Orchestra, played for Atlantis\u2019 commander Chris Ferguson, as Atlantis herself put on a light show via a serious of burns to close in on the ISS.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-20118\" title=\"A561\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A5611.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"344\" height=\"209\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A5611.jpg 344w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A5611-180x110.jpg 180w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 344px) 100vw, 344px\">A minor hiccup was noted during the early part of the Flight Day, when Atlantis\u2019 GPC-3 (General Purpose Computer) suffered a problem. However, this held no impacts for the rendezvous and docking phase of the flight, given the redundancy, and is no concern given it should return to action, along with no further GPC failures expected. Losing two GPCs would be more of a concern.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDuring the set expansion for rendezvous, when the GPC3 MODE switch was taken from HALT to STBY, the GPC temporarily joined the common set then failed out of the common set,\u201d noted the Mission Evaluation Room (MER) report.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe crew reported that the mode switch was in the STBY position and both the MODE and OUTPUT talkbacks were barberpole.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Aerospace &amp; Defense<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Spaceflight history books<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Spaceflight news subscription<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>This was the same GPC which suffered a similar issue during Atlantis\u2019 STS-122 flight, which also included STS-135 mission specialist Rex Walheim, allowing for a quick-witted CAPCOM Steve Robinson to joke \u201cYou can draw your own conclusions, but it\u2019s the same GPC, on the same orbiter, and the same MS2.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-20119\" title=\"A3\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A319.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"344\" height=\"251\">With Atlantis arriving on time on the R-Bar underneath the Station, Commander Ferguson took the controls and guided her through the 360 degree backflip, the final time an orbiter will conduct the RPM under the Station they helped to build.<\/p>\n<p>As Atlantis then moved on to the TORVA (Twice Orbital Rate V-bar Approach), the orbiter was placed in front of the Station, smoothly entering final approach, prior to a perfect docking at 10:07 Central time. With leak checks carried out ahead of schedule, the joint crews opened their respective hatches for a 11:47 Central time welcoming ceremony, officially starting the docked phase of the STS-135 mission.<\/p>\n<p>As to when Atlantis will depart, the likelihood the MMT will approve a one day extension is being aided by some excellent cryo management with the orbiter, currently show a margin of 1 day and 3 hours, another increase from the Flight Day 2 status on consumables.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-20120\" title=\"A4\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A47.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"343\" height=\"227\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A47.jpg 343w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A47-263x175.jpg 263w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 343px) 100vw, 343px\">By this time Atlantis docked, the ISS crew had already started to send the massive dump of photographs taken of Atlantis during the RPM to the DAT engineers in Houston.<\/p>\n<p>The hundreds of images consisted of 400mm, 800mm and 1000mm photos (several hundred megabytes of which have already been uploaded on L2\u2019s STS-135 Special Section).<\/p>\n<p>The stock of imagery will be evaluated by the DAT over the next few days, via a Level I, Level II and Peer Review, with an aim to provide a recommendation to the MMT (Mission Management Team) to clear Atlantis for Entry, usually within a few day\u2019s time.<\/p>\n<p>Good news has already been reported to the MMT via the Flight Day 2 opening inspections via the use of the Orbiter Boom Sensor System (OBSS), after all \u201cRegions Of Interest\u201d were passed as no concern for the same entry of Atlantis.<\/p>\n<p>UPDATE: Late on Flight Day 3 the crew were informed that, pending a peer review, the DAT engineers have found no areas which would require a Focused Inspection, confirming the orbiter has a very clean TPS. Only five minor areas will be fully evaluated over the next dat or so.<\/p>\n<p>STS-135 Specific Articles: http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/tag\/sts-135\/<\/p>\n<p>STS-135\/Atlantis WLEIDS launch data review:<\/p>\n<p>Following a stunning and emotional climb out of the Kennedy Space Center Friday morning, Space Shuttle Atlantis safely reached orbit on the power of her twin Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs) and stalwart Space Shuttle Main Engines (SSMEs). Shortly after ascent, data from the Wing Leading Edge Impact Detection System (WLEIDS) revealed a very clean ascent in terms of potential impacts to Atlantis\u2019 delicate WLE RCC panels.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-20125\" title=\"A6\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A68.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"351\" height=\"284\">As reported to the Mission Management Team (MMT) in the Launch +12 Hours STS-135 In-Flight WLEIDS Report, Atlantis\u2019 WLEIDS system worked perfectly and registered only two potential impacts \u2013 both on the vehicle\u2019s starboard wing.<\/p>\n<p>As noted in the presentation, available for download on L2, \u201cAll 96 WLEIDS ascent summary data files was downloaded and down linked successfully. Eight (8) half-second windows of detailed G time histories were downloaded in order to confirm the implication of cases above 1 Grms.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>All background noise and RCC settling levels for STS-135 were in family with background levels observed on previous missions. While there have been no WLEIDS anomalies reported or identified, there was minor \u201cnoise\u201d on the port wing 11\/12 RCC (Reinforced Carbon-Carbon) panels observed late in the ascent of Atlantis.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>All WLEIDS systems and unites (except for two) activated within 0.15seconds of each other beginning at Main Engine Ignition (MEI) at T-6.6seconds. The remaining two sensor units, numbers 1086 and 110 on the port wing, activated within 0.5seconds of MEI.<\/p>\n<p>On-orbit WLEIDS monitoring for Micro-Meteoroid Orbiting Debris (MMOD) began with port and starboard Group 2 WLEIDS sensors 17hours 48minutes after liftoff.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the L+12 Hour report revealed one possible impact location\/event and one \u201cquestionable\u201d indication on the starboard RCC panels of Atlantis during her climb uphill.<\/p>\n<p>There were zero impact triggers on the port wing of Atlantis and zero trigger indications on both her port and starboard Chines. The one confirmed trigger that could indicate a possible impact on Atlantis\u2019 WLE RCC panels occurred on Starboard panel 8.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-20127\" title=\"A8\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A86.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"348\" height=\"242\">The sensors on this panel \u2013 as well as sensors in the immediate surrounding areas, registered a potential impact event at Mission Elapsed Time (MET) 109.6 seconds \u2013 or 1 minute 49.6 seconds after liftoff from Pad 39A.<\/p>\n<p>The impact registered on the WLEIDS with a Grms value of 3.05. This places the trigger in the \u201cprobable\u201d category of impact.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, all evaluation criteria \u2013 Transient, Non-Mission, Shock, Damping, Spectral, and Multi-Sensor \u2013 were met by this WLEDIS trigger.<\/p>\n<p>Specifically, these six criteria are defined by the STS-135 L+12 Hour WLEIDS report as: \u201cTransient \u2013 Sudden significant elevated response; Non-mission \u2013 Not a normal mission event, e.g. global response; Spectral \u2013 Sudden significant elevated high frequency response; Shock \u2013 Transient with characteristics of a shock response; Damping \u2013 Relatively low logarithmic decay rate of response amplitude; Multi-Sensor \u2013 Transient corroborated by sensors around indicated panel.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>With all six criteria met, a trigger indication of 3.05 Grms, the data was placed into Category IV of the probability of damage matrix, meaning the probability of damage is between 1\/200 and 1\/100.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"widget-title penci-border-arrow\">See Also<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>STS-135 LIVE Updates<\/li>\n<li>L2&nbsp;STS-135&nbsp;&nbsp;Section<\/li>\n<li>Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Conversely, the only other WLEIDS trigger during ascent was on starboard RCC panel 20 and contained a registered Grms reading of 1.36.<\/p>\n<p>The event was registered at MET 68.8 seconds \u2013 or 1 minute 8.8 seconds after liftoff \u2013 and occurred during the Max Q period of flight.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, the trigger did not meet all six evaluation criteria. Only four criteria were met: transient, shock, damping, and spectral. WLEDIS data returned \u201cuncertain\u201d information regarding the non-mission and multi-sensor criteria.<\/p>\n<p>However, there are no WELIDS sensors on RCC panels 21 and 22 on both the port and starboard wings, so potential corroborating evidence does not exist since there is no way to gain information outboard of panel 20.<\/p>\n<p>With all this information, the second WLEIDS trigger falls in Category I of the probability of damage matrix, meaning the probability of damage is less than 1\/1000.<\/p>\n<p>STS-135\/Atlantis L+24 Hour WLEDIS On-orbit data review:<\/p>\n<p>After spending her first day in orbit, Atlantis\u2019 WLEIDS data was once again downloaded and down linked successfully to flight controllers and engineers in Houston.<\/p>\n<p>A review of L+24 Hours WLEIDS data revealed ZERO impact indications across the WLEIDS.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-20126\" title=\"A7\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A77.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"218\" height=\"220\">Nonetheless, while there were no impact indications, there was one WLEIDS trigger event at MET 18 hours 16 minutes 00 seconds.<\/p>\n<p>The trigger occurred at the port RCC panels 3 and 4 interface and registered on WLEIDS sensors along the 3\/4 RCC panel interface with a Grms value of 0.76, below the \u201cquestionable\u201d and \u201cprobable\u201d Grms limits for impact potential.<\/p>\n<p>While the indication was low, it did meet five of the six evaluation criteria: transient, non-mission, shock, damping, and spectral.<\/p>\n<p>It did not, however, register across multiple sensors on surrounding panels.<\/p>\n<p>Comprehensive WLIELDS systems\/personnel overview:<\/p>\n<p>According to the STS-135 Wing Leading Edge Impact Detection System Overview presentation, available for download on L2, a ground team comprised of three divisions will be responsible for evaluating and report WLEIDS data to the appropriate divisions over the course of the mission.<\/p>\n<p>The three ground team divisions for STS-135\/Atlantis are: ES\/Structural Engineering (or WLE MER [Mission Evaluation Room]), EV\/Government Furnished Equipment (WIS GFE), and DO5\/Assembly &amp; Checkout Officer (ACO) Flight Controllers.<\/p>\n<p>The WLE MER team will be further broken-down into two categories: Post-Ascent and On-orbit MMOD monitoring. Specific post-ascent duties will include providing impact summary for TPS assessment and supporting WLE survey inspections and focused inspections.<\/p>\n<p>For the On-orbit MMOD monitoring portion of the flight, the Ground Team will be tasked with providing standalone results for any WLEIDS triggers and supporting late-inspection activities.<\/p>\n<p>System management and evaluation will be the primary task of the WIS GFE group during the STS-135 mission, with a focus on commanding, data processing, battery life estimation, and temperatures of the system.<\/p>\n<p>The DO5\/ACO Flight Controllers will be tasked with keeping abreast of and developing crew procedures, overall system cognizance, Ku-Band coverage capability at critical times, anomaly resolution leadership, and system and operation status reporting to the flight crew.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-20121\" title=\"A941\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A941.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"346\" height=\"253\">However, none of this would be possible without the numerous hardware elements installed on Atlantis.<\/p>\n<p>In all, 132 accelerometers (66 per wing) and 40 temperature sensors (20 per wing) are mounted behind the first 20 RCC panels on the wing spars of Atlantis.<\/p>\n<p>In turn, 44 sensor units (22 per wing) are located in Atlantis\u2019 wings. Each Sensor Unit, which is designed to gather and process data from accelerometers, has three (3) accelerometers and one temperature sensor attached to it.<\/p>\n<p>Each Sensor Unit contains internal temperature and battery voltage measurements, and the units are grouped together into clusters known as \u201csensor farms.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In turn, these Sensor Units will communicate via Radio Frequency (RF) with the Wing Relay Units, of which there are 2 units per wing and one per \u201csensor farm.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In each wing, eight Sensor Units (units 1-8) are located on each wing glove \u201csensor farm\u201d mounting plate. Units 9-22 (14 total units) are located on the wing cavity \u201csensor farm\u201d mounting plate.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-20122\" title=\"A74\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A741.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"349\" height=\"214\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A741.jpg 349w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A741-180x110.jpg 180w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 349px) 100vw, 349px\">The wing glove \u201csensor farms\u201d will communicate with their respective Wing Relay Unit on Channel A; the wing cavity \u201csensor farms\u201d will communicate with their respective Wing Relay Unit on Channel B.<\/p>\n<p>The Wing Relay Units are in turn connected via hardline to the Cabin Relay Units located in middeck cabin locker MA9G.<\/p>\n<p>The Cabin Relay Units (2 + 1 spare) will then communicate the data received by the Wing Relay Units to the Laptop Receiver Unit via RF. The two Laptop Receiver Units will then transmit the data to the primary A31p Laptop which runs the WLES (Wing Leading Edge Sensor) software and stores the data from the Sensor Units.<\/p>\n<p>In all, there are two A31p laptops, one primary and one backup. Only the primary laptop will communicate with the WLES system.<\/p>\n<p>All sensor and relay units have independent battery units; thus, the entire system is not subject to the same power source and can maintain operational status even if one sensor or relay unit\u2019s battery source is depleted prematurely during the mission.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-20123\" title=\"A5\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A55.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"341\" height=\"269\">In all, use of the WLEIDS for STS-135\/ULF7 began four days before launch when KSC personnel programmed the sensor units with event files. In all, four launch opportunities were programmed into the system with emphasis on Ascent Data Collection and Assessment.<\/p>\n<p>Final verification of battery charges for the system was taken at this time and the system secured in a deactivated mode.<\/p>\n<p>On launch day, the system remained in the deactivated mode until SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engine) ignition at T-6.6 seconds. At this time, Atlantis\u2019 computers triggered the activation of the WLEIDS and all 44 units began collecting 16-bit data at 20,000 samples her second. This continued through MECO (Main Engine Cutoff).<\/p>\n<p>Following MECO, at MET 10 minutes, the sensor units created ascent summary data files before transitioning to on-orbit power-saving \u201cidle\u201d mode.<\/p>\n<p>Four hours after launch, Atlantis\u2019 flight crew set up the LAN (Local Area Network)\/OCA (Orbiter Communications Adaptor) system and verified nominal WLES operation.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-20124\" title=\"A83\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/A831.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"347\" height=\"256\">MCC (Mission Control) then commanded the primary A31p laptop to download all WLEIDS information from the Sensor Units at a rate of 0.4 KB\/s. It took take about 1 minute to transfer a single ascent summary file and 1.5 hours to transfer ascent summary data.<\/p>\n<p>After this, the raw data was downlinked to the ground for assessment. Downlink was accomplished through the Ku-Band antenna at a rate of 250 KB\/s or 500 KB\/s depending on the Ku-Band channel utilized.<\/p>\n<p>Following a review of this data, the Mission Evaluation Room (MER) determined if any additional data should be downlinked. Their determination was that not additional data was needed.<\/p>\n<p>Following the WLEIDS sensor units transition to \u201cidle\u201d mode to preserve battery power through their scheduled deactivation on FD-12, the sensor units will be used to monitor Atlantis for MMOD impacts during both free-flight and docked periods.<\/p>\n<p>This monitoring will be accomplished by placing the sensor units into 2 or 3 monitoring groups per wing. This will enable MCC to rotate through the monitoring groups so that one group is in use for no more than 21hrs at a time.<\/p>\n<p>This will allow for maximization of battery life on the system and, in turn, ensure MMOD monitoring during the highest MMOD risk periods.<\/p>\n<p>A temperature of at least -40-degrees F will be maintained inside each wing structure during the on-orbit operational period of the WLEIDS to ensure proper functionality of the system.<\/p>\n<p>In terms of crew procedures\/interaction with the WLES during the flight, there will be three categories of interaction: nominal, off-nominal, and reconfiguration.<\/p>\n<p>For nominal ops, the crew will perform activation and checkout of the system on FD-1; perform rendezvous tools checkout prep and before PILOT OPS; perform WLES recovery ops after docking and undocking; and perform deactivation of the system on FD-12 in preparation for entry and landing.<\/p>\n<p>Off-nominal activities could include Laptop Receiver Unit R&amp;R (Removal and Replacement), Cabin Relay Unit R&amp;R, and Laptop Receiver Unit troubleshooting.<\/p>\n<p>For reconfiguration activities, the crew could have to prepare for laptop transfer to a different location within Atlantis.<\/p>\n<p>For crew actions toward the WLEIDS, both Chris Ferguson and Rex Walheim are trained for WLES operations, and Sandy Magnus has received the WLES ops overview class and can help with troubleshooting.<\/p>\n<p>All WLES procedures are contained within the Orbit Ops Book, and nominal crew WLEIDS activities will take ~40 minutes of crew time.<\/p>\n<p>To read about Atlantis and her sisters \u2013 from birth,&nbsp;processing,&nbsp;every single mission,&nbsp;through to retirement, click here for the&nbsp;links:<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/forum.nasaspaceflight.com\/index.php?topic=25837.0<\/p>\n<p>(Images: Via L2 content. Further articles on STS-135 will be produced during and after her mission, driven by L2\u2032s STS-135 Special Section which is following the mission at MMT\/MER level, surrounded by a wealth of FRR\/PRCB\/MER\/MMT and SSP documentation\/pressentations,&nbsp;videos, images and&nbsp;more.<\/p>\n<p>(As with all recent missions, L2 is providing full exclusive level mission coverage, available no where else on the internet. To join L2, click here: http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/l2\/)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Atlantis has docked to the International Space Station (ISS) \u2013 one final time \u2013 following an emotional R-Bar Pitch Maneuver (RPM) and text book approach to the orbital outpost. Her mission performance continues to be exemplary, as the Damage Assessment Team review the health of the&nbsp;Thermal Protection System, in tandem with data from the orbiter\u2019s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":29649,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3659,7935],"class_list":["post-40395","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-sts-135","tag-tps"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40395"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40395"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40395\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}