![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/A325.jpg\" "\\"A3\\"")
Following the FI of the three-tile damage location, lovingly dubbed \u201cThe Maine\u201d damage because of its remarkable resemblance to the U.S. state of Maine, a detailed characterization of the damage was compiled.<\/p>\nAfter nearly 12 days of docked operations with Space Station Alpha, the Space Shuttle Endeavour, NASA youngest Shuttle orbiter, departed the international outpost to begin her final journey home. Thanks to the superb work by her flight crew and her thousands of support staff on terra firma, Endeavour\u2019s Thermal Protection System (TPS) was formally cleared for reentry thanks in large part to Endeavour\u2019s former Orbiter Boom Sensor System.<\/p>\n
Click here for ENDEAVOUR UNDOCKING AND STORRM OVERVIEW ARTICLE:
\nhttp:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/2011\/05\/sts-134-endeavour-storrm-final-farewell-to-iss\/<\/p>\n
Following the preliminary clearance of all areas of Endeavour\u2019s TPS on FD-5, less the multi-tile gouge area between Endeavour\u2019s Right Hand MLGD (Main Landing Gear Door) and Right Hand ET Umbilical door, Endeavour\u2019s flight crew was instructed to proceed with a focused inspection of the damage location.<\/p>\n
Post Undocking TPS Damage Assessment Team (DAT) clearance:<\/p>\n
Prior to that, all Damage Assessment Team (DAT) assessment of OBSS (Orbiter Boom Sensor) data and FD3 RPM (R-bar Pitch Maneuver) photography from the ISS confirmed that Endeavour\u2019s two ET umbilical well doors were closed, that there were no upper flight surface protrusion of any kind, and that six of the seven lower damage sites had been cleared without the need for a Focused Inspection (FI).<\/p>\n
Following the FI of the three-tile damage location, lovingly dubbed \u201cThe Maine\u201d damage because of its remarkable resemblance to the U.S. state of Maine, a detailed characterization of the damage was compiled.<\/p>\n
From this, it was confirmed that all tile material was still intact in all areas with no exposed filler bar material; no cracks were identified; the dark area of TPS as seen from RPM imagery was an area of abrupt damage depth change \u2013 as expected; all thermal stress assessments revealed no structural overtemp issues for reentry; a \u201csmall area\u201d of TPS bondline overtemp would occur during reentry but is acceptable for reentry due to its distribution over three tiles; all TPS and structural margins were well within safety limits for reentry.<\/p>\n
Thus, the TPS DAT unanimously recommended clearing Endeavour\u2019s entire Thermal Protection System for reentry in emergency return cases and for nominal EOM (End of Mission) reentry pending the completion of the Docked Late Inspection (DLI).<\/p>\n
Click here for the previous five STS-134 DAT TPS Status Articles: http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/tag\/tps\/<\/p>\n
Company News (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n Detailed Focused Inspection damage site clearance overview:<\/p>\n This means that tile margin exists in all areas of the damage cavity, or what the post-FI inspection presentation \u2013 available for download on L2 \u2013 classed as a \u201cdense layer.\u201d (View Anaglyph slide left with 3D glasses).<\/p>\n In all, the damage location is 0.89 inches in depth, 2.95 inches in length, and 2.43 inches in width.<\/p>\n In fact, the TPS clearance presentation notes that there are very few areas of missing material and no cracks radiating outward or downward from the main damage site.<\/p>\n Furthermore, views of the damage location obtained from the OBSS\u2019s Laser Dynamic Range Imager (LDRI) confirmed that sections \u2013 but not all \u2013 of some AMES gap fillers were missing, indicating that the \u201cImpactor had enough energy to damage multi-layer AMES gap filler.\u201d<\/p>\n However, it appears that the AMES gap fillers had an unintended positive consequence as \u201cAdjacent tile damage size [was] reduced by the presence of AMES gap filler.\u201d<\/p>\n STS-134\/Endeavour\u2019s damage was 3.22\u2033 x 2.49\u2033, was located at Xo 1243 Yo 106 Zo 267, and was located on a tile with a thickness of 1.04 inches.<\/p>\n Based on analysis conducted during the STS-118 mission, that mission\u2019s damage was found, based on on-orbit information analysis, to have a Mach 16.7 Boundary Layer Transition (BLT) time. STS-134\u2019s damage is predicted to have a Mach 12 (nominal) BLT time.<\/p>\n All STS-134 FI damage was further found to have baseline aeroheating, BLT, Boundary Layer Wedge, Cavity Heating, Thermal Analysis, Tile Stress, and Stress indicators in Model Category \u201cA\u201d \u2013 indicating that \u201cBaselined model used within model limitations or intended use.\u201d<\/p>\n Based on these parameters, a maximum structural temperature of 219-degrees F and a maximum RTV bondline local temperature of 1,194-degrees F are expected during entry on Wednesday morning. The maximum structural temperature allowed is 350-degrees F, leaving high structural margin.<\/p>\n Nonetheless, the total RTV bondline temperature does exceed nominal limits; however, RTV bondline temperature \u201cover 625\u00b0F is limited to 6 inches squared distributed over 3 tiles.\u201d For the damage site on STS-134\/Endeavour, the aligned flow max temperature is predicted at a modeled rate of 5.75 inches squared with an actual in-flight temp on the critical tile of 4.06 inches squared \u2013 both meeting the design requirements.<\/p>\n Therefore, all structural margins remain positive for STS-134 and the OPO (Orbiter Project Office) and DAT unanimously recommended clearing Endeavour\u2019s TPS for entry.<\/p>\n \u201cDAT resolved issues associated with difficulties modeling complex damage, and is in good posture to support STS-135,\u201d notes the overview presentation.<\/p>\n Following this assessment, Endeavour\u2019s TPS was cleared for entry pending the results of the Docked Late Inspection, or DLI.<\/p>\n After completing the DLI, the DAT identified 162 regions of interest (ROI) on the vehicle\u2019s Reinforced Carbon-Carbon wing leading edge panels.<\/p>\n Across the spectrum of flights from STS-121 to STS-133 \u2013 excluding STS-114 (no Late Inspection on that mission), STS-124, and STS-132 \u2013 the average ROI count was 151, with a high ROI count of 771 on STS-124 (results not included in the average since the mission could not conduct a standard post-launch OBSS inspection) and a low count on STS-133 of 52.<\/p>\n These ROIs were quickly cleared by the DAT and Endeavour\u2019s TPS unanimously and formally cleared for entry.<\/p>\n STS-134 Specific Articles: http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/tag\/sts-134\/<\/p>\n And from NASA and the OBSS team to the OBSS now permanently affixed to the International Space Station, these parting words reflect the importance of all three booms in their service to the Shuttle program and its courageous astronauts: \u201cAs Shuttle says \u2018goodbye\u2019 to the OBSS and \u2018thank you\u2019 to the sensors for their outstanding service, Station says \u2018welcome\u2019 to the EIBA \u2013 Enhanced ISS Boom Assembly.<\/p>\n \u201cMay the EIBA serve the ISS as well as the OBSS has served Shuttle.<\/p>\n \u201cFarewell, OBSS, and job well done!\u201d<\/p>\n Communication checks with ground stations were also deemed to be succesful, which were carried out after entry and landing simulations via the use of a laptop and flight stick.<\/p>\n The crew also recorded \u2013 after mission the window in communications \u2013 a tribute video for Endeavour, which will be edited and played back sometime on Tuesday.<\/p>\n Next article will be published early on Tuesday.<\/p>\n (Images via L2 presentations, images and content). Extensive coverage is being provided on the news site, forum and L2 special sections \u2013 the latter of which is the world\u2019s best front row seat to Shuttle missions. With specific and extensive flight day coverage, from interactive \u201cone stop\u201d FD live coverage in the open forum, to internal documentation, photos, videos and content in the specific L2 FD areas).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" After nearly 12 days of docked operations with Space Station Alpha, the Space Shuttle Endeavour, NASA youngest Shuttle orbiter, departed the international outpost to begin her final journey home. Thanks to the superb work by her flight crew and her thousands of support staff on terra firma, Endeavour\u2019s Thermal Protection System (TPS) was formally cleared […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[9171,8715,3366,7935],"class_list":["post-40438","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-dat","tag-obss","tag-sts-134","tag-tps"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40438"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40438"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40438\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40438"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40438"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40438"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/A612.jpg\" "\\"A6\\"")
Following the detailed and fascinating Focused Inspection of the \u201cMaine\u201d damage site, photographic and laser measurement data revealed that the damage was 0.89 inches in depth, +\/-0.04 inches, and remained above the filler bar.<\/p>\nSee Also<\/h4>\n
\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/A851.jpg\" "\\"A85\\"")
In comparison to a similar tile damage event on the STS-118\/Endeavour mission, the STS-118 damage was 3.48\u2033 x 2.31\u2033 x 1.12\u2033, was located at Xo 1260 Yo 123 Zo 269, and carried a tile depth of 1.12 inches.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/A714.jpg\" "\\"A7\\"")
A maximum temperature calculation for the FI damage locations was created, and \u201cDue to flow orientation, assessment [was] performed in both the aligned and cross-flow orientations of the simplified cavity,\u201d notes the TPS DAT clearance overview presentation.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/B511.jpg\" "\\"B51\\"")
Likewise, the cross flow max temperature is predicted at a modeled rate of 6.19 inches squared with an actual in-flight temp on the critical tile expected at 3.98 inches squared \u2013 again, well within the design criteria.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/A108.jpg\" "\\"A10\\"")
But most importantly, none of this detailed assessment of the \u201cMaine\u201d damage location would have been possible without Endeavour\u2019s trusty OBSS. To this end, NASA created a special presentation on the life and times of the OBSSs over their six years of service to the Space Shuttle Program \u2013 from inception, to creation, to first flight, to significant achievements in space.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/A517.jpg\" "\\"A5\\"")
Flight Day 16 \u2013 also known as EOM-1 (End Of Mission minus one day) successfully completed the checkout of Endeavour\u2019s Flight Control Surfaces \u2013 via the use of APU-1 \u2013 prior to a full firing of Endeavour\u2019s Reaction Control System (RCS) thrusters.<\/p>\n