{"id":40906,"date":"2009-12-25T00:26:03","date_gmt":"2009-12-24T16:26:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/sts-130-endeavour-ready-for-rollout-after-late-repairs-on-et-134\/"},"modified":"2009-12-25T00:26:03","modified_gmt":"2009-12-24T16:26:03","slug":"sts-130-endeavour-ready-for-rollout-after-late-repairs-on-et-134","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/sts-130-endeavour-ready-for-rollout-after-late-repairs-on-et-134\/","title":{"rendered":"STS-130: Endeavour ready for rollout after late repairs on ET-134"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A tiny washer has been removed from External Tank ET-134, after an engineer spotted the rouge item embedded into GO2 pressline guide rail. Engineers had to dig out the washer, prior to carrying out foam repairs to the area of the tank \u2013 which have since been completed. The STS-130 stack will remain in the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) over Christmas, ahead of a January 6 rollout.<\/p>\n<p>STS-130 Tank Troubleshoot:<\/p>\n<p>The STS-130 stack is fully configured for rollout to Pad 39A, but will wait until the new year for departure out of the VAB \u2013 as the workforce enjoy the holidays and power outage work takes place out at the Pad 39 complex.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPlatform C retraction was completed Wednesday,\u201d noted the final processing report for the year (L2), as the stack remains powered down over Christmas. \u201cThe vehicle is configured for Rollout to Pad-A; preparations will resume on Jan 4 with the actual Rollout is planned for 1\/6\/10.\u201d<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"widget-title penci-border-arrow\">See Also<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>LIVE STS-130 UPDATES<\/li>\n<li>L2 STS-130 Special Section<\/li>\n<li>Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Most of the work on the stack had been completed last week, until a walkdown of the vehicle resulted in an engineer spotting a washer embedded into the tank \u2013 documenting it as an \u201cOut of Place Processing Materials (OOPPMs).\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As per usual, shuttle managers took even this small issue very seriously, as it became the main topic of a daily Program Requirements Control Board (PRCB) meeting at the Johnson Space Center (JSC) in Houston.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIssue: During Orbiter mate operations in the integration cell, a technician noticed a single washer between the GO2 Pressline guide rail and the Cable tray bracket. Attempts to remove washer were unsuccessful,\u201d noted one of two presentations created by the PRCB, and available on L2.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-12988\" title=\"A2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/A212.jpg\" alt=\"A2\" width=\"283\" height=\"226\">\u201cConcern: Debris potential created from \u2018loose\u2019 washer. Metallic debris is not allowed. Washers required to ensure min\/max gap requirements between guide rail and pressline (0.0\u201d min \u2013 0.032\u201d max).\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It is not known how the washer managed to find its way into its out of place location, though a similar issue was reported back on ET-42.<\/p>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>Engineers at the Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF) in New Orleans were also asked to check ET-135 \u2013 currently enroute to the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) for STS-131, and ET-136 \u2013 which will be used on STS-132. No issues were found on either tank.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSimilar condition does not exist on ET-135 or ET-136. Similar condition has occurred previously at KSC on ET-42. Hardware removed and re-installed per design,\u201d added the presentation, which moved into options for several removal technics \u2013 or if they could fly the tank without removing the washer.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cET Project identified potential solutions to address concern: 1) Remove closeout and entire assembly to access washer and replace entire closeouts. 2) Partial trim of closeout, break torque and repair. 3) Spot bond washer \u2013 Pending debris risk assessment. 4) Use as is \u2013 Pending debris risk assessment \u2013 Risks and benefits for each option characterized.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>STS-130 Specific Articles: http:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/tag\/sts-130\/<\/p>\n<p>Three main options were then presented, with managers opting for the compromise approach of removing just a small area of surrounding foam, prior to removing the washer. This option ensured no negative impact would be felt on the rollout schedule of STS-130.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-12989\" title=\"A3\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/A310.jpg\" alt=\"A3\" width=\"304\" height=\"217\">\u201cRecommendation: Proceed with Option 2 \u2013 Eliminates debris potential with minimal technical and schedule risk,\u201d added the PRCB presentation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOption 2: Removal of washer \u2013 Use as repaired. Approach: Trim out minimum required foam from subject area. Remove hardware and IB rail. Break joint on nut\/bolt to open gap. Ensure washer removed, Do not reinstall washer, re-torque to requirements \u2013 check gaps to drawing. Reassemble IB rail and Repair foam.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBenefits: Less work than full R&amp;R required. Less schedule impact risk. No tooling mods required \u2013 no demo required. Engineering requirements maintained. Risks: Low technical risk. Washer debris potential eliminated. All TPS (Thermal Protection System) repairs \/ applications are within experience base. Lower schedule risk than Option 1.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Engineers wasted no time in implementing the procedures, spending just a couple of days to carry out the work listed in Option 2, with the replaced foam now curing during the vehicle\u2019s stay inside the VAB. Option 1 would have involved a four day impact to STS-130\u2019s pad flow.<\/p>\n<p>The flawless removal of the waster and repair of the worksite was praised by Shuttle managers, with the entire process of spotting the washer, to working and carrying out corrective work on the issue, taking just a few days.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs reported by the Flow Director, this was a great effort by the team to complete this work with minimal repairs,\u201d noted Shuttle management, who are expecting the arrival of the next tank \u2013 ET-135 \u2013 at the turn basin at KSC on December 25, ahead of offloading in the new year.<\/p>\n<p><em><em>L2 members<\/em><\/em><em><em>:&nbsp;Documentation \u2013 from which the above article has quoted snippets \u2013 is available in full in the related L2 sections, now over 4000 gbs in size<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A tiny washer has been removed from External Tank ET-134, after an engineer spotted the rouge item embedded into GO2 pressline guide rail. Engineers had to dig out the washer, prior to carrying out foam repairs to the area of the tank \u2013 which have since been completed. The STS-130 stack will remain in the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[9202,9183],"class_list":["post-40906","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-et-134","tag-sts-130"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40906"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40906"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40906\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40906"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40906"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40906"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}