{"id":40953,"date":"2009-10-28T19:45:21","date_gmt":"2009-10-28T11:45:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/ares-i-x-launches-managers-claim-successful-test-flight\/"},"modified":"2009-10-28T19:45:21","modified_gmt":"2009-10-28T11:45:21","slug":"ares-i-x-launches-managers-claim-successful-test-flight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/ares-i-x-launches-managers-claim-successful-test-flight\/","title":{"rendered":"Ares I-X launches \u2013 managers claim successful test flight"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Ares I-X has launched on the second attempt at 11:30am Eastern, and although the First Stage and the Upper Stage Simulator (USS) appeared to recontact after separation&nbsp;(later&nbsp;confirmed that no recontact took place)&nbsp;\u2013 managers are claiming the flight to be a success. Sources also claim&nbsp;one of the FS\u2019 parachutes failed, with the booster&nbsp;splashing down&nbsp;with two working parachutes.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Ares I-X Attempt 2 (pre-launch): <\/p>\n<p>The&nbsp;first launch attempt on&nbsp;Tuesday&nbsp;was delayed for 24 hours due to several weather rule violations, including excessive wind speeds at the launch pad \u2013 which were exceeding the 20-knot limit \u2013 along with concerns about clouds with moisture that could have caused static build-up on the rocket and led to communication issues \u2013 known technically as triboelectrification.<\/p>\n<p>With slight delays caused by issues other than the weather \u2013 such as the problem with the removal of a protective cover from the top of the vehicle and the ship that breached the strict Eastern Range exclusion zone \u2013 time was lost prior to coming out of the four minute hold.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"widget-title penci-border-arrow\">See Also<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>LIVE: Ares I-X Updates<\/li>\n<li>L2 Ares I-X&nbsp;Section<\/li>\n<li>L2 Ares\/HLV\/Orion Sections<\/li>\n<li>Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>At one point, the count managed to head past the hold and got as close to as two and a half minutes to launch, before the weather once again closed in \u2013 with Weather Office Kathy Winters giving notice of unacceptable conditions at T-0.<\/p>\n<p>While lightning and rain were observed near the launch pad overnight, forecasters&nbsp;were more hopeful for acceptable conditions for the Wednesday launch attempt, predicting a 60 percent chance of favorable weather, with four hours of window available to launch director Ed Mango. However, triboelectrification weather conditions moved the launch back to 11:30am Eastern.<\/p>\n<p>Recent \u2013 over the past one year period \u2013 Ares I-X Articles on NASASpaceflight.com can be found on this link:<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/tag\/ares-i-x\/<\/p>\n<p>Key Launch Events:<\/p>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>With the countdown overviewed in the opening launch attempt article, Wednesday\u2019s attempt focused on the launch events, as Ares I-X opened the flight test era of the Ares launch vehicle program \u2013 albeit a program that may yet be cancelled in the coming months.<\/p>\n<p>At liftoff, Ares I-X will weigh 1.8 million lbs, with the four segment SRB providing between 2.6 and 3.3 million lbs of thrust that will propel the Ares I-X to a height of 130,000 ft. The SRB nozzle will be gimbaled at Mission Elapsed Time (MET) 0.1 seconds for the \u201cfly away\u201d maneuver (designed to pull I-X away from the launch tower). First motion off the MLP is expected at MET 0.2 seconds.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-12279\" title=\"A2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/A222.jpg\" alt=\"A2\" width=\"357\" height=\"286\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/A222.jpg 357w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/A222-350x280.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 357px) 100vw, 357px\">The RoCS (Roll Control System) will be enabled and the 90-degree roll program started at MET six seconds. The \u201cfly away\u201d maneuver will be considered complete at MET 20-seconds.<\/p>\n<p>For the first 91 seconds of flight, the RoCS system will be activated every 10 seconds to counter any axial roll of the vehicle. MaxQ is expected at ~MET 50 seconds. The Flight Control System phase of flight will transition into the separation phase of flight at MET 2 minutes 00.6 seconds.<\/p>\n<p>According to flight timelines, SRB burnout is expected at MET 2 minutes 4 seconds; however, the latest possible time of SRB burnout is MET 2 minutes 12 seconds. As such, all further flight times are based on this no later than SRB burnout time.<\/p>\n<p>The Booster Deceleration Motor and Pyro Initiator Controller will be armed for separation at MET 2 minutes 13.9 seconds with the Thruster Vector Control system commanded to \u201cnull\u201d and RoCS deactivated at MET 2 minutes 14 seconds. The SRB APU will be shutdown at MET 2 minutes 14.5 seconds.<\/p>\n<p>Eight Booster Deceleration Motors will fire at MET 2 minutes 14.9 seconds, followed 0.1 seconds later by First Stage and USS separation. The Booster Deceleration Motors are designed to pull the SRB clear of the frustum and USS.<\/p>\n<p>At the time of SRB and USS separation, the Ares I-X will be travelling at approximately mach 4.76 at an altitude of 130,000 ft. The maximum acceleration force during flight will be 2.48 g. The SRB tumble motors will fire at MET 2 minutes 18-seconds, inducing a horizontal tumble into the SRB\u2019s profile. This will increase drag on the SRB, preventing recontact with the free flying USS and slowing the SRB down during reentry.<\/p>\n<p>The Recovery Control Unit pyro will be armed at MET 2 minutes 45-seconds.<\/p>\n<p>Booster parachutes in focus:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-12280\" title=\"A4\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/A411.jpg\" alt=\"A4\" width=\"283\" height=\"204\">After coasting to an altitude of 150,000 ft, the parachute system will engage at 16,000 ft (or MET 5 minutes 15 seconds) with the deployment of pilot chutes. The main chutes will be deployed at MET 6 minutes 15 seconds, brining the SRB to a manageable speed for splashdown in the Atlantic.<\/p>\n<p>The First Stage nozzle will be severed from the SRB at MET 6 minutes 35 seconds, with splashdown occurring ~147 miles downrange from KSC just prior to MET 7 minutes. The USS will also coast to approximately 150,000 ft before plunging into the Atlantic Ocean at near terminal velocity. The USS is expected to break apart upon impact with the water and sink to the ocean floor.<\/p>\n<p>The parachute recovery system is the most mature element of the Ares hardware that is currently under development.<\/p>\n<p>Several tests have been carried out at the US Army Yuma Proving Grounds on the giant parachutes which are set to return the five segment Ares I first stage to a splash down in the Atlantic Ocean.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-12281\" title=\"A5\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/A57.jpg\" alt=\"A5\" width=\"284\" height=\"217\">The latest successful test was just this month, with a 72,000 pound test payload, including the Jumbo Drop Test Vehicle (JDTV), dropped from the back of a US Air Force C-17 aircraft at 25,000 feet \u2013 designed to test the design load limits of the Ares I main parachute system.<\/p>\n<p>Engineers from NASA\u2019s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) manage the team conducting the tests, designed to place 100 percent of the flight dynamic pressures on the main parachute canopy.<\/p>\n<p>The main parachute, measuring 150 feet in diameter and weighing 2,000 pounds, is the largest rocket parachute ever built and the primary element of the vehicle\u2019s deceleration and recovery system, which also includes a pilot parachute and drogue parachute.<\/p>\n<p>The parachutes work in tandem providing the drag necessary to slow the descent of the huge Ares I solid rocket motor, allowing for a relatively gentle splashdown and subsequent recovery.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-12282\" title=\"A6\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/A63.jpg\" alt=\"A6\" width=\"330\" height=\"312\">While Ares I-X is a four segment motor, an \u201cempty\u201d fifth segment \u2013 known as the \u201cXL\u201d motor segment \u2013 makes up the first stage. The change of design to the four segment Shuttle booster will result in additional useful data that will be gained after Ares I-X\u2019s powered flight ends.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, the recovery of the First Stage via the parachute system is classed as the Priority 4 task of this test flight: \u201cDemonstrate FS (First Stage) entry dynamics and sequencing of events (parachute deployment, etc.),\u201d noted Launch Readiness Review Documentation (presentations on L2).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDemonstrate First Stage separation sequencing, quantify First Stage atmospheric entry dynamics, and evaluate parachute performance.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>With the Ares booster recovery system including some of the heritage from the shuttle\u2019s booster systems, issues on the final flights of the shuttle are also providing important information for the next generation of space vehicle.<\/p>\n<p>STS-128 IFA Review highlights SRB parachute failure:<\/p>\n<p>Such information can be seen as recently as the last shuttle mission, STS-128 \u2013 when it was revealed by the In Flight Anomaly Review (IFA) review that the main parachute on the Right Hand Solid Rocket Booster recovery system failed, leading to the booster impacting the ocean with a higher than expected force.<\/p>\n<p>The review was conducted at a Program Requirements Control Board (PRCB) meeting, with 15 departments presenting issues found prior, during and after Discovery returned to Earth. A large number of departments noted no issues.<\/p>\n<p>The results of the IFA review created the baseline for the next mission\u2019s Flight Readiness Review (FRR) \u2013 namely Atlantis\u2019 STS-129 mission in November, and also Discovery\u2019s next mission \u2013 STS-131 next year.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-12283\" title=\"A7\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/A71.jpg\" alt=\"A7\" width=\"246\" height=\"272\">Highlights from the IFA presentations \u2013 all acquired by L2 \u2013 include the main parachute anomaly on the Right Hand Booster. As with Ares I-X, the booster has three main parachutes that slow the expended booster during its splashdown in the Atlantic ahead of recovery and eventual reuse.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOne of three RH main parachutes failed to fully inflate. Data Acquisition System (DAS) indicated failure occurred 3.9 seconds after frustum separation. Postflight inspection revealed damage on gore number 5 extending from above vent band to skirt band,\u201d noted the STS-128 SRB IFA presentation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cParachute on tenth flight. Involved in previous failure on STS-30R. Anomaly Resolution Team (ART-272) formed. Investigation on-going. Booster recovery not affected by loss of one parachute.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Several conclusions can be noted from the failure, that the booster still survived for potential reuse despite the loss of one of the main parachute, and that this parachute was on its tenth flight and was repaired from an issue it suffered on a previous flight.<\/p>\n<p>The full results of how the parachutes performed with Ares I-X are expected just days after launch, once the booster and recovery systems are examined back in port.<\/p>\n<p><em><em>L2 members<\/em><\/em><em><em>:&nbsp;Documentation \u2013 from which the above article has quoted snippets \u2013 is available in full in the related L2 sections, now over 4000 gbs in size.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ares I-X has launched on the second attempt at 11:30am Eastern, and although the First Stage and the Upper Stage Simulator (USS) appeared to recontact after separation&nbsp;(later&nbsp;confirmed that no recontact took place)&nbsp;\u2013 managers are claiming the flight to be a success. Sources also claim&nbsp;one of the FS\u2019 parachutes failed, with the booster&nbsp;splashing down&nbsp;with two working [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[9203,7806,9205],"class_list":["post-40953","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-ares-i-x","tag-srb","tag-sts-128"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40953"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40953"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40953\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40953"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}