- \n
- LIVE STS-129 UPDATES<\/li>\n
- L2 STS-129 Special Section<\/li>\n
- Click here to Join L2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\u201cS0008 Shuttle Interface Test: SSV (Space Shuttle Vehicle) power up was completed at 1551 Saturday evening. Completion of S0008 delayed by IPR (Interim Problem Report): During Range Safety Interface Test attenuator adjustment, AGC levels on RH (Right Hand) side were low.<\/p>\n
\u201cTroubleshooting found cables swapped on the facility attenuator panel. However, fixing the cable swap did not correct the low AGC levels. Additional troubleshooting indicated the problem is in other facility cables (one between the HDP (Hold Down Point) to SRB (Solid Rocket Booster) or one from the HDP to the MLP (Mobile Launch Platform) Haunch).<\/p>\n
\u201cIn order to access these cables for replacement, HDP 2, which is closedout for flight needs to be opened. Cable replacement is in work.\u201d<\/p>\n
This issue was resolved within a matter of hours, following the cable replacement and a retest.<\/p>\n
Spaceflight news subscription
<\/path>Aerospace industry analysis <\/path>Aerospace & Defense <\/path>\n (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n
\u201cUpdate: The faulty cables causing the low AGC levels were replaced and the vehicle was powered up to support Shuttle Range Safety System (SRSS) attenuator adjusting, SRSS system interface testing and stray voltage testing which were all successfully completed.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rollout of the STS-129 Stack began slightly later than scheduled at 6:38am local time. Despite a stop of around 30 minutes a third the way down the crawlerway, Atlantis arrived at 39A ahead of 1pm.<\/p>\n
STS-128 IFA Review (Ascent Imagery):<\/p>\n
Closing out the highly successful STS-128 mission in August\/September, NASA has completed its series of In-Flight Anomaly (IFA) reviews for the 30th construction mission to the International Space Station. Highlighting the extremely clean nature of the flight is the lack of Ascent Imagery, KSC, Mission Operations Directorate, and general Integrated IFAs for the mission.<\/p>\n
![\"A3\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/A37.jpg\" "\\"A3\\"")
As is standard practice for all Space Shuttle missions, NASA\u2019s Imagery Analysis Teams at the Johnson Space Center, the Kennedy Space Center, and the Marshall Space Flight Center conducted a thorough review of all ascent imagery obtained during Discovery\u2019s mid-night launch on August 28th\/29th.<\/p>\nThe results of that analysis yielded 456 total observations submitted for further analysis.<\/p>\n
Of these 456 observations, 13 events were elevated to \u201creportable\u201d item status. Of those 13, zero were included in the Safety Engineering & Integration Integrated Tracking Matrix and three were included in the Integrated IFA summary.<\/p>\n
The first of the 13 \u201creportable\u201d items came a T-4.153 seconds, when debris was observed \u201cnear the port OMS Pod and Payload Bay Door interface,\u201d notes the Ascent Imagery report \u2014 available for download on L2.<\/p>\n
Currently, this item is classed as \u201cclosed\u201d along with five other ascent debris events.<\/p>\n
![\"A2\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/A210.jpg\" "\\"A2\\"")
The other \u201cclosed\u201d items include possible ice or frost on Discovery at the location of the LH2 (Liquid Hydrogen) T0 umbilical interface at MET (Mission Elapsed Time) 0.73 seconds and debris near the right hand SRB (Solid Rocket Booster) Aft Skirt hold down post #4 at MET 39.6 \u2013 45.2 seconds.<\/p>\nThe remaining three closed imagery items include a ruptured GN2 (Gaseous Nitrogen) line which sprayed GN2 onto the left hand SRB Aft Skirt Instafoam at MET 1.039 seconds, \u201cVapor Traveling Aft on -Z Side of External Tank\u201d at MET 67.4 seconds, and the loss of ET (External Tank) TPS (Thermal Protection System) on the LH2 Intertank Flange.<\/p>\n
The remaining seven items are still considered \u201copen.\u201d In order of their occurrence in flight, these items include an ET TPS liberation near the lower right hand corner of the GUCP (Ground Umbilical Carrier Plate) at MET 0.57 seconds and debris \u201ctraveling aft along port fuselage\u201d at MET 20 seconds.<\/p>\n
Debris was also observed falling aft of the vehicle under the left hand wing of Discovery at MET 21 seconds, a liberation of debris from the +Y thrust strut of the ET at MET 55.7 seconds, and aft-falling debris located near the ET -Y Intertank region at MET 2 minutes 3 seconds.<\/p>\n
The final two \u201creportable\u201d imagery events occurred at MET 2 minutes 4 seconds. These comprised two debris impacts to Discovery\u2019s left hand wing \u201coutboard of the Port Main Landing Gear Door\u201d as observed via the onboard SRB engineering aft forward-facing camera.<\/p>\n
Kennedy Space Center IFAs:<\/p>\n
All KSC IFAs were reviewed and baselined into the KSC Engineering Review Board (ERB) and presented to the SICB on September 22 \u2013 eleven days after Discovery\u2019s landing and 26-days after Discovery\u2019s launch.<\/p>\n
In terms of reportable items in the wake of Discovery\u2019s launch at the Kennedy Space Center, STS-128 is one of the cleanest flights in the history of the Shuttle Program.<\/p>\n
In all, \u201cno items of special note for KSC,\u201d states the KSC IFA presentation, available for download on L2.<\/p>\n
![\"A5\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/A54.jpg\" "\\"A5\\"")
There were no System Specific or General Pad equipment IFAs and no System Specific Government Flown Equipment related IFAs for STS-128.<\/p>\nIn fact, only nine general pad debris items met the Problem Reporting and Corrective Action criteria for STS-128 as defined by National Space Transportation System (NSTS) safety guideline 08126.<\/p>\n
Of these nine items, six have been closed, with appropriate action assigned to ensure that all open work is complete prior to STS-129 in November.<\/p>\n
The remaining three are awaiting final closure documentation and are also not a constraint or concern for STS-129 next month.<\/p>\n
Furthermore, six of these were classed as General Pad debris items (which ties the record for second lowest General Pad debris items with STS-123) and three System Specific debris items \u2013 the lowest number on record.<\/p>\n
There were also zero System Specific Government Flown Equipment (GFE) debris items, which ties STS-128 with STS-119 and STS-125 for the lowest System Specific GFE debris items on record.<\/p>\n
Of these nine debris items, eight have been included in the Integrated STS-128 IFA Summary for the Program Requirements Control Board.<\/p>\n
With STS-128\u2019s IFAs included, the liftoff debris risk environment is unchanged from pre-STS-128 limits. Currently, the risk of critical Orbiter damage from liftoff debris is classed as \u201cinfrequent, catastrophic.\u201d<\/p>\n
Mission Operations Directorate IFAs:<\/p>\n
In short, the Mission Operations Directorate (MOD) identified no IFAs for STS-128.<\/p>\n
However, demonstrating their dedication to safety, the MOD took the time to identify several Non-IFA Items of Interest from STS-128.<\/p>\n
The first of these items of interest was the loss of the Vernier thrusters on Discovery during FD-2 (Flight Day 2).<\/p>\n
In response to this, the MOD has called for a review of the Reaction Control System (RCS) Flight Rules to better understand the Flight Control Teams\u2019 options should this situation arise on a future mission.<\/p>\n
An Orbit Flight Techniques Panel was handed the task of reviewing the Flight Rules, with instructions to report back to the MOD on October 22 with their recommendations\/report.<\/p>\n
![\"A6\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/A6.jpg\" "\\"A6\\"")
The second item of interest pertained to the PMA-3 (Pressurized Mating Adapter #3) clocking issue observed during one of STS-128\u2019s EVAs.<\/p>\nThe root cause of the \u201cPMA-3 clocking issue for heater cable connections is still under investigation through ISS IFI 7361,\u201d notes the MOD presentation, also available for download on L2.<\/p>\n
MOD has also begun a review of their internal process for tracking \u201cISS configuration changes\u201d to ensure that this issue does not happen again.<\/p>\n
The next item of interest related to an unexpected pre-launch delay in the Mission Control Center\u2019s (MCC\u2019s) commanding during the MILA (Merritt Island Launch Annex) antenna alignment.<\/p>\n
\u201cSecond of two planned pre-launch command server selectovers did not perform as expected,\u201d notes the MOD presentation.<\/p>\n
The fifth item of interest on the MOD\u2019s list was a problem with the HD TV downlink on FD-10.<\/p>\n
\u201cHDTV Downlink Problems (FD10) due to full MPC hard drive in MCC.\u201d<\/p>\n
The problem was eventually resolved by purging the MCC MPC hard drive. In the future, the MOD would like to monitor the MCC hard drives more closely and perform purges as-needed to avoid further complications.<\/p>\n
The sixth and final MOD item of interest revolved around the scheduling conflict with TDRS 46 (Tracking and Data Relay Satellite 46) during critical phases of the mission.<\/p>\n
\u201cInternal MOD scheduling conflict with TDRS 46 for critical periods during eclipse was discovered and corrected prior to final TDRS scheduling,\u201d notes the presentation.<\/p>\n
The MOD is investigating the cause of the scheduling conflict in order to have better information on scheduled procedures and channels.<\/p>\n
STS-128 Integrated IFA Summary:<\/p>\n
In addition to the Ascent Imagery and KSC IFAs that were included in the Integrated IFA Report to the Program Requirements Control Board, the report notes only three additional Integrated IFAs for STS-128.<\/p>\n
![\"A7\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/A7.jpg\" "\\"A7\\"")
The first additional IFA related to the LH2 PV-12 inboard Fill and Drain valve inside orbiter Discovery.<\/p>\nThe valve, which was on its 16th and final flight due to time cycle requirements which mandate the replacement of each PV valve after 16 flights, failed to indicate closed during the final moments of tanking for STS-128\u2019s second launch attempt.<\/p>\n
\u201cOn 8\/26 launch attempt, during transition to reduced fast fill, LH2 inboard fill & drain valve (PV12) position indicator did not indicate closed when valve was commanded closed,\u201d notes the Integrated IFA Report, available for download on L2. This was a violation of Launch Commit Criteria MPS-04 and resulted in an automatic scrub of the launch attempt.<\/p>\n
After de-tanking and boil-off were complete, the valve was cycled at ambient temperatures and performed as designed, with the valve registering closed each time it was commanded closed.<\/p>\n
This allowed Mission Managers to develop Flight Rationale and modified Launch Commit Criteria (LCC) for the valve for STS-128 only.<\/p>\n
During the launch countdown on August 28, the valve performed flawlessly under cryogenic temperatures \u2014 as it had during the first launch attempt of STS-128 on August 25.<\/p>\n
The second Integrated IFA pertained to ice buildup external to the LH2 T0 umbilical into orbiter Discovery.<\/p>\n
\u201cOn August 25 launch attempt, ice buildup was observed on -Z side of LH2 T-0 Umbilical, bridging over to Orbiter TPS. LCC ICE-01 waiver LW-114 approved.\u201d<\/p>\n
A similar ice buildup was observed on the August 28 launch attempt and a similar waiver was obtained for flight.<\/p>\n
![\"A8\"](\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/A8.jpg\" "\\"A8\\"")
Lastly, the final IFA reported for STS-128 is that of the SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engine) nozzle pinhole leaks.<\/p>\nAs first seen on STS-127 \u2013 and first reported by NASASpaceFlight.com \u2013 numerous pinhole sized leaks were discovered on one of the Endeavour\u2019s engines during post-flight checkouts at the engine refurbishment facility at the Kennedy Space Center.<\/p>\n
These pinhole sized leaks were discovered after Discovery\u2019s liftoff and were thus not part of the STS-128 pre-launch discussions.<\/p>\n
Upon examination of Discovery\u2019s main engines during her stay at the Dryden Flight Research Center, over 200 pinhole sized leaks were also observed on one of her engines.<\/p>\n
Around the time of the inspection of Discovery\u2019s engines, program engineers found what they believe to be the root cause of the leaks: corrosion due to adhesive tape from standard processing.<\/p>\n
In all, engineers will perform several tests and analyses to ensure that the \u201ccorrosion mechanism is understood.\u201d<\/p>\n
Right now, these leaks are not considered to be a show-stopper for STS-129 next month as it is believed that even the worst case leakage from this issue would not cause \u201csignificant performance impacts\u201d during the ride uphill.<\/p>\n
L2 members<\/em><\/em>: Documentation \u2013 from which the above article has quoted snippets \u2013 is available in full in the related L2 sections, now over 4000 gbs in size.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The STS-129 stack has completed rollout from the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) to Pad 39A Wednesday, ahead of the Flight Readiness Review (FRR) season \u2013 which begins with the MOD FRR on Thursday \u2013 that will clear the vehicle to launch on November 12. The STS-128 In Flight Anomaly (IFA) review will make up a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[9205,9199],"class_list":["post-40965","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-sts-128","tag-sts-129"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40965"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40965"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40965\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40965"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}