{"id":41764,"date":"2007-03-24T22:15:02","date_gmt":"2007-03-24T14:15:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/falcon-i-flight-preliminary-assessment-positive-for-spacex\/"},"modified":"2007-03-24T22:15:02","modified_gmt":"2007-03-24T14:15:02","slug":"falcon-i-flight-preliminary-assessment-positive-for-spacex","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/falcon-i-flight-preliminary-assessment-positive-for-spacex\/","title":{"rendered":"Falcon I flight \u2013 preliminary assessment positive for SpaceX"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has noted that the preliminary assessment of the second Falcon I flight shows that the second stage shut down only a minute before schedule \u2013 and still managed to deploy its satellite mass simulator ring.<\/p>\n<p>The shutdown appears to have been caused by the sloshing of propellant in the LOX tank, increasing observed oscillation, which would normally have been successfully dampened out by the second stage Thrust Vector Control (TVC) system. However, the impact on the second stage nozzle during separation caused a \u2018hard slew\u2019 correction, over-compensating previously simulated scenarios.<\/p>\n<p>The Falcon I launch vehicle lifted off from its Kwajalein Atoll launch pad in the Pacific Ocean last week, putting behind the failure \u2013 which occurred just seconds into first stage flight ascent&nbsp;\u2013 of its debut launch a year ago. <\/p>\n<p>Although the video of the launch webcast cut off just after 5 minutes of flight, SpaceX have now gained visuals from the entire flight, past the point of the premature second stage shutdown.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><iframe title=\"Falcon 1 DemoFlight 2 Launch\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Lk4zQ2wP-Nc?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen=\"\" name=\"fitvid0\" data-gtm-yt-inspected-14=\"true\" data-gtm-yt-inspected-21=\"true\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>\u2018Except for a few blips here and there, we have now recovered video and telemetry for the entire mission, including well past 2nd stage shutdown, which only occurred about a minute before schedule (roughly T + 7.5 mins),\u2019 noted Musk to NASASpaceflight.com. \u2018Including all the video, we have somewhere close to a terabyte of information to review.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018This was far too much to send over the T1 satellite link from Kwaj and had to be brought over in person after the flight. A number of our engineers have only just returned from Kwaj and we have not had a chance to caucus, so please consider this still a preliminary assessment.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>As observed on the webcast, an increasing level of oscillation could be seen on the second stage. While this is initially being blamed on the sloshing of propellant in the LOX tank, SpaceX had simulated \u2013 and planned for \u2013 such a scenario. However, the impact on the second stage nozzle, which was subsequently corrected by the TVC system, added an extra \u2013 unexpected \u2013 parameter for the TVC to counter.<\/p>\n<p>Rocket launch schedules<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Technology News<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>Spaceflight news subscription<path d=\"M7.59009 18.59L9.00009 20L17.0001 12L9.00009 4L7.59009 5.41L14.1701 12\" style=\"animation: initial !important; background: initial !important; border: 0px !important; box-shadow: none !important; color: inherit !important; cursor: inherit !important; direction: inherit !important; display: inline !important; fill: currentcolor !important; filter: initial !important; float: none !important; margin: 0px !important; opacity: initial !important; outline: 0px !important; overflow: initial !important; padding: 0px !important; stroke: initial !important; transform: initial !important; vertical-align: initial !important; visibility: inherit !important;\"><\/path>\n<p>     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/p>\n<p>\u2018In a nutshell, the data appears to show that the increasing oscillation of the second stage was due to the slosh frequency in the LOX tank coupling with the thrust vector control system,\u2019 added Musk.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-74177\" class=\"size-full wp-image-74177\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/01\/Capture-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1800\" height=\"979\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/01\/Capture-1.png 1800w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/01\/Capture-1-350x190.png 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/01\/Capture-1-630x343.png 630w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/01\/Capture-1-768x418.png 768w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/01\/Capture-1-1170x636.png 1170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1800px) 100vw, 1800px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-74177\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Schematic of the Falcon 1 rocket from several angles. Credit: SpaceX<\/p>\n<p>\u2018Our simulations prior to flight had led us to believe that the control system would be able to damp out slosh, however we had not accounted for the perturbations of an impact on the stage during separation, followed by a hard slew to get back on track.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>While the impact observed during separation failed to damage the second stage engine\u2019s nozzle, the cause is currently being blamed on the vehicle\u2019s rotation being fives times higher than the expected maximum.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018The nozzle impact during stage separation occurred due to a much higher than expected vehicle rotation rate of about 2.5 deg\/sec vs. the maximum&nbsp;expected of 0.5 deg\/sec. As the 2nd stage nozzle exited the interstage, the first stage was rotating so fast that it smacked the niobium nozzle,\u2019 Musk noted. \u2018There was no apparent damage to the nozzle, which is not a big surprise given that niobium is tough stuff. <\/p>\n<p>\u2018The unexpectedly high rotation rate was due to not knowing the shutdown transient of the 1st stage engine (Merlin) under flight conditions. The actual shutdown transient had a very high pitch over force, causing five times the max expected rotation rate.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Initial commentary in the media was based mainly on five minutes of webcasted video. However, now that the full video and data has now been acquired by SpaceX, a number of bonuses have been noted.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-74207\" class=\"size-full wp-image-74207\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/01\/main-qimg-39019ecc78a1b34ec6abe30990596c7a.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"602\" height=\"452\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/01\/main-qimg-39019ecc78a1b34ec6abe30990596c7a.jpg 602w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/01\/main-qimg-39019ecc78a1b34ec6abe30990596c7a-350x263.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.nasaspaceflight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/01\/main-qimg-39019ecc78a1b34ec6abe30990596c7a-466x350.jpg 466w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 602px) 100vw, 602px\"><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-74207\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">An aerial view of Omelek Island in the Kwajalein Atoll, where every Falcon 1 launched from. Credit: SpaceX<\/p>\n<p>\u2018On the plus side, the data shows that this is the only thing that stopped the Falcon 1 test flight 2 from reaching full orbital velocity,\u2019 said Musk. \u2018The second stage was otherwise functioning well and even deployed the satellite mass simulator ring at end of flight!\u2019<\/p>\n<p>More evaluations will follow, as SpaceX engineers pore&nbsp;over the vast amount of data they now have available to them. The initial findings raise the hopes of medium level modifications being able to correct the issues noted. <\/p>\n<p>\u2018We definitely want both the diagnosis and cure vetted by third party experts, however we believe that the slosh issue can be dealt with easily by adding more baffles, particularly in the LOX tank. The Merlin shutdown transient can be addressed by initiating shutdown at a much lower G level, albeit at some risk to engine reusability.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018Provided we have a good set of slosh baffles, even another nozzle impact at stage separation would not pose a significant flight risk (although obviously we will work hard to avoid that).\u2019<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has noted that the preliminary assessment of the second Falcon I flight shows that the second stage shut down only a minute before schedule \u2013 and still managed to deploy its satellite mass simulator ring. The shutdown appears to have been caused by the sloshing of propellant in the LOX tank, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41764","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41764"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41764"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41764\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}