{"id":44173,"date":"2025-06-19T22:19:27","date_gmt":"2025-06-19T14:19:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/spacexs-next-starship-just-blew-up-on-its-test-stand-in-south-texas\/"},"modified":"2025-06-19T22:19:27","modified_gmt":"2025-06-19T14:19:27","slug":"spacexs-next-starship-just-blew-up-on-its-test-stand-in-south-texas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/spacexs-next-starship-just-blew-up-on-its-test-stand-in-south-texas\/","title":{"rendered":"SpaceX\u2019s next Starship just blew up on its test stand in South Texas"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>SpaceX\u2019s next Starship rocket exploded during a ground test in South Texas late Wednesday, dealing another blow to a program already struggling to overcome three consecutive failures in recent months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The late-night explosion at SpaceX\u2019s rocket development complex in Starbase, Texas, destroyed the bullet-shaped upper stage that was slated to launch on the next Starship test flight. The powerful blast set off fires around SpaceX\u2019s Massey\u2019s Test Site, located a few miles from the company\u2019s Starship factory and launch pads.<\/p>\n<p>Live streaming video from NASASpaceflight.com and LabPadre media organizations with cameras positioned around Starbase showed the 15-story-tall rocket burst into flames shortly after 11:00 pm local time (12:00 am EDT; 04:00 UTC). Local residents as far as 30 miles away reported seeing and feeling the blast.<\/p>\n<p>SpaceX confirmed the Starship, numbered Ship 36 in the company\u2019s inventory, \u201cexperienced a major anomaly\u201d on a test stand as the vehicle prepared to ignite its six Raptor engines for a static fire test. These hold-down test-firings are typically one of the final milestones in a Starship launch campaign before SpaceX moves the rocket to the launch pad.<\/p>\n<p>The explosion occurred as SpaceX finished loading super-cold methane and liquid oxygen propellants into Starship in preparation for the static fire test. The company said the area around the test site was evacuated of all personnel, and everyone was safe and accounted for after the incident. Firefighters from the Brownsville Fire Department were dispatched to the scene.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOur Starbase team is actively working to safe the test site and the immediate surrounding area in conjunction with local officials,\u201d SpaceX posted on X. \u201cThere are no hazards to residents in surrounding communities, and we ask that individuals do not attempt to approach the area while safing operations continue.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In a separate post on X, SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk wrote that preliminary data suggests a high-pressure nitrogen tank failed inside Starship\u2019s payload bay. Many rockets have such tanks, or composite overwrapped pressure vessels, containing high-pressure gases used for purging and pressurizing different compartments inside the vehicle. These tanks, or COPVs, can be finicky. SpaceX engineers blamed hardware associated with COPVs for the only two catastrophic failures of the Falcon 9 rocket in 2015 and 2016.<\/p>\n<p>,<\/p>\n<p>Musk wrote that the nitrogen COPV appears to have failed below its proof pressure, within conditions that should not have damaged the tank. \u201cIf further investigation confirms that this is what happened, it is the first time ever for this design,\u201d Musk added.<\/p>\n<h2>Picking up the pieces<\/h2>\n<p>Earlier Wednesday, just hours before the late-night explosion at Starbase, an advisory released by the Federal Aviation Administration showed SpaceX had set June 29 as a tentative launch date for the next Starship test flight. That won\u2019t happen now, and it\u2019s anyone\u2019s guess when SpaceX will have another Starship ready to fly.<\/p>\n<p>Massey\u2019s Test Site, named for a gun range that once occupied the property, is situated on a bend in the Rio Grande River, just a few hundred feet from the Mexican border. The test site is currently the only place where SpaceX can put Starships through proof testing and static fire tests before declaring the rockets are ready to fly.<\/p>\n<p>The extent of the damage to ground equipment at Massey\u2019s was not immediately clear, so it\u2019s too soon to say how long the test site will be out of commission. For now, though, the explosion leaves SpaceX without a facility to support preflight testing on Starships.<\/p>\n<p>The videos embedded below, from NASASpaceflight.com and LabPadre, show multiple angles of the Starship blast.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/71AwkBt3_ts?si=P_OZOAvZ9bXbHx8t\" width=\"678\" height=\"381\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/vlSrcjnAN7Q?si=0COnzmhvjTTBDz1Q\" width=\"678\" height=\"381\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>The explosion at Massey\u2019s is a reminder of SpaceX\u2019s rocky path to get Starship to this point in its development. In 2020 and 2021, SpaceX lost several Starship prototypes to problems during ground and flight testing. The visual of Ship 36 going up in flames harkens back to those previous explosions, along with the fiery demise of a Falcon 9 rocket on its launch pad in 2016 under circumstances similar to Wednesday night\u2019s incident.<\/p>\n<p>SpaceX has now launched nine full-scale Starship rockets since April 2023, and before the explosion, the company hoped to launch the 10th test flight later this month. Starship\u2019s track record has been dreadful so far this year, with the rocket\u2019s three most recent test flights ending prematurely. These setbacks followed a triumphant 2024, when SpaceX made clear progress on each successive Starship suborbital test flight, culminating in the first catch of the rocket\u2019s massive Super Heavy booster with giant robotic arms on the launch pad tower.<\/p>\n<p>,<\/p>\n<p>Stacked together, the Super Heavy booster stage and Starship upper stage stand more than 400 feet tall, creating the largest rocket ever built. SpaceX has already flown a reused Super Heavy booster, and the company has designed Starship itself to be recoverable and reusable, too.<\/p>\n<p>After last year\u2019s accomplishments, SpaceX appeared to be on track for a full orbital flight, an attempt to catch and recover Starship itself, and an important in-space refueling demonstration in 2025. The refueling demo has officially slipped into 2026, and it\u2019s questionable whether SpaceX will make enough progress in the coming months to attempt recovery of a ship before the end of this year.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"ars-wp-img-shortcode id-2101930 align-fullwidth\">\n<p>              <img width=\"1800\" height=\"1200\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/GettyImages-2202949789.jpg\" class=\"fullwidth full\" alt=\"\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/GettyImages-2202949789.jpg 1800w, https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/GettyImages-2202949789-640x427.jpg 640w, https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/GettyImages-2202949789-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/GettyImages-2202949789-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/GettyImages-2202949789-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/GettyImages-2202949789-980x653.jpg 980w, https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/GettyImages-2202949789-1440x960.jpg 1440w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1800px) 100vw, 1800px\"><\/p>\n<p>              A Super Heavy booster and Starship upper stage are seen in March at SpaceX\u2019s launch pad in South Texas, before the ship was stacked atop the booster for flight. The Super Heavy booster for the next Starship flight completed its static fire test earlier this month.<\/p>\n<p>                  Credit:<br \/>\n                                      Brandon Bell\/Getty Images<\/p>\n<\/figure>\n<h2>Ambition meets reality<\/h2>\n<p>SpaceX debuted an upgraded Starship design, called Version 2 or Block 2, on a test flight in January. It\u2019s been one setback after another since then.<\/p>\n<p>The new Starship design is slightly taller than the version of Starship that SpaceX flew in 2023 and 2024. It has an improved heat shield to better withstand the extreme heat of atmospheric reentry. SpaceX also installed a new fuel feed line system to route methane fuel to the ship\u2019s Raptor engines, and an improved propulsion avionics module controlling the vehicle\u2019s valves and reading sensors.<\/p>\n<p>Despite\u2014or perhaps because of\u2014all of these changes for Starship Version 2, SpaceX has been unable to replicate the successes it achieved with Starship in the last two years. Ships launched on test flights in January and March spun out of control minutes after liftoff, scattering debris over the sea, and in at least one case, onto a car in the Turks and Caicos Islands.<\/p>\n<p>SpaceX engineers concluded the January failure was likely caused by intense vibrations that triggered fuel leaks and fires in the ship\u2019s engine compartment, resulting in an early shutdown of the rocket\u2019s engines. Engineers said the vibrations were likely in resonance with the vehicle\u2019s natural frequency, intensifying the shaking beyond the levels SpaceX predicted.<\/p>\n<p>,<\/p>\n<p>The March flight failed in a similar fashion, but SpaceX\u2019s investigators determined the most probable root cause was a hardware failure in one of the ship\u2019s engines, a different failure mode than two months before.<\/p>\n<p>During SpaceX\u2019s most recent Starship test flight last month, the rocket completed the ascent phase of the mission as planned, seemingly overcoming the problems that plagued the prior two launches. But soon after the Raptor engines shut down, a fuel leak caused the ship to begin tumbling in space, preventing the vehicle from completing a guided reentry to test the performance of new heat shield materials.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"ars-wp-img-shortcode id-2094769 align-fullwidth\">\n<p>              <img width=\"1500\" height=\"844\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/ship35staticfire2.jpg\" class=\"fullwidth full\" alt=\"\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/ship35staticfire2.jpg 1500w, https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/ship35staticfire2-640x360.jpg 640w, https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/ship35staticfire2-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/ship35staticfire2-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/ship35staticfire2-384x216.jpg 384w, https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/ship35staticfire2-1152x648.jpg 1152w, https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/ship35staticfire2-980x551.jpg 980w, https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/ship35staticfire2-1440x810.jpg 1440w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1500px) 100vw, 1500px\"><\/p>\n<p>              File photo of a Starship static fire in May at Massey\u2019s Test Site.<\/p>\n<\/figure>\n<p>SpaceX is working on a third-generation Starship design, called Version 3, that the company says could be ready to fly by the end of this year. The upgraded Starship Version 3 design will be able to lift heavier cargo\u2014up to 200 metric tons\u2014into orbit thanks to larger propellant tanks and more powerful Raptor engines. Version 3 will also have the ability to refuel in low-Earth orbit.<\/p>\n<p>Version 3 will presumably have permanent fixes to the problems currently slowing SpaceX\u2019s pace of Starship development. And there are myriad issues for SpaceX\u2019s engineers to solve, from engine reliability and the ship\u2019s resonant frequency, to beefing up the ship\u2019s heat shield and fixing its balky payload bay door.<\/p>\n<p>Once officials solve these problems, it will be time for SpaceX to bring a Starship from low-Earth orbit back to the ground. Then there\u2019s more cool stuff on the books, like orbital refueling and missions to the Moon in partnership with NASA\u2019s Artemis program. NASA has contracts worth more than $4 billion with SpaceX to develop a human-rated Starship that can land astronauts on the Moon and launch them safely back into space.<\/p>\n<p>The Trump administration\u2019s proposed budget for NASA would cancel the Artemis program\u2019s ultra-expensive Space Launch System rocket and Orion crew capsule after two more flights, leaving commercial heavy-lifters to take over launching astronauts from the Earth to the Moon. SpaceX\u2019s Starship, already on contract with NASA as a human-rated lander, may eventually win more government contracts to fill the role of SLS and Orion under Trump\u2019s proposed budget. Other rockets, such as Blue Origin\u2019s New Glenn, are also well-positioned to play a larger role in human space exploration.<\/p>\n<p>,<\/p>\n<p>NASA\u2019s official schedule for the first Artemis crew landing on the Moon places the mission sometime in 2027, using SLS and Orion to transport astronauts to the vicinity of the Moon to meet up with SpaceX\u2019s Starship lunar lander. After that mission, known as Artemis III, NASA would pivot to using commercial rockets from Elon Musk\u2019s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos\u2019 Blue Origin to replace the Space Launch System.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, SpaceX\u2019s founder and CEO has his sights set on Mars. Last month, Musk told his employees he wants to launch the first Starships toward the Red Planet in late 2026, when the positions of Earth and Mars in the Solar System make a direct journey possible. Optimistically, he would like to send people to Mars on Starships beginning in 2028.<\/p>\n<p>All of these missions are predicated on SpaceX mastering routine Starship launch operations, rapid reuse of the ship and booster, and cryogenic refueling in orbit, along with adapting systems such as life support, communications, and deep space navigation for an interplanetary journey.<\/p>\n<p>The to-do list is long for SpaceX\u2019s Starship program\u2014too long for Mars landings to seem realistic any time in the next few years. NASA\u2019s schedule for the Artemis III lunar landing mission in 2027 is also tight, and not only because of Starship\u2019s delays. The development of new spacesuits for astronauts to wear on the Moon may also put the Artemis III schedule at risk. NASA\u2019s SLS rocket and Orion spacecraft have had significant delays throughout their history, so it\u2019s not a sure thing they will be ready in 2027.<\/p>\n<p>While it\u2019s too soon to know the precise impact of Wednesday night\u2019s explosion, we can say with some confidence that the chances of Starship meeting these audacious schedules are lower today than they were yesterday.<\/p>\n<p><em>Updated at 3:30 pm EDT (19:30 UTC) with more details from Elon Musk.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SpaceX\u2019s next Starship rocket exploded during a ground test in South Texas late Wednesday, dealing another blow to a program already struggling to overcome three consecutive failures in recent months. The late-night explosion at SpaceX\u2019s rocket development complex in Starbase, Texas, destroyed the bullet-shaped upper stage that was slated to launch on the next Starship [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":44174,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[25,316,739,317,1898],"class_list":["post-44173","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-launch","tag-spacex","tag-starbase","tag-starship","tag-texas"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44173"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44173"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44173\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/44174"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}