{"id":44201,"date":"2025-06-06T23:21:02","date_gmt":"2025-06-06T15:21:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/senate-response-to-white-house-budget-for-nasa-keep-sls-nix-science\/"},"modified":"2025-06-06T23:21:02","modified_gmt":"2025-06-06T15:21:02","slug":"senate-response-to-white-house-budget-for-nasa-keep-sls-nix-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/senate-response-to-white-house-budget-for-nasa-keep-sls-nix-science\/","title":{"rendered":"Senate response to White House budget for NASA: Keep SLS, nix science"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Negotiations over the US federal budget for fiscal year 2026 are in the beginning stages, but when it comes to space, the fault lines are already solidifying in the Senate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Trump White House released its budget request last Friday, and this included detailed information about its plans for NASA. On Thursday, just days later, the US Senate shot back with its own budget priorities for the space agency.<\/p>\n<p>The US budget process is complicated and somewhat broken in recent years, as Congress has failed to pass a budget on time. So, we are probably at least several months away from seeing a final fiscal year 2026 budget from Congress. But we got our first glimpse of the Senate\u2019s thinking when the chair of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) released his \u201clegislative directives\u201d for NASA on Thursday.<\/p>\n<p>These specific directives concern \u201creconciliation\u201d for the current budget year, which are supplemental appropriations for NASA and other federal agencies under the purview of Cruz\u2019s committee. And this committee does not actually write the budget; that\u2019s left to appropriations committees in the House and Senate.<\/p>\n<h2>Senate space priorities<\/h2>\n<p>However, Cruz is one of the most important voices in the US Senate on space policy, and the directives released Thursday indicate where he intends to line up on NASA during the upcoming budget fights.<\/p>\n<p>Here is how his budget ideas align with the White House priorities in three key areas:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Science<\/strong>: The Trump White House budget sought to significantly cut the space agency\u2019s science budget, from $7.33 billion to $3.91 billion, including the cancellation of some major missions. Cruz makes no comment on most of the science budget, but in calling for a Mars Telecommunications Orbiter, he is signaling support for a Mars Sample Return Mission.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Lunar Gateway<\/strong>: The Trump administration called for the cancellation of a small space station to be built in an elongated lunar orbit. There is very uneven support for this in the space community, but it is being led at Johnson Space Center, in Cruz\u2019s home state. Cruz says Congress should \u201cfully fund\u201d the Gateway as \u201ccritical\u201d infrastructure.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Space Launch System and Orion<\/strong>: The Trump administration sought to cancel the large, expensive rocket and spacecraft after Artemis III, the first lunar landing. Cruz calls for additional funding for at least Artemis IV and Artemis V.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>,<\/p>\n<p>This legislation, the committee said in a messaging document, \u201cDedicates almost $10 billion to win the new space race with China and ensure America dominates space. Makes targeted, critical investments in Mars-forward technology, Artemis Missions and Moon to Mars program, and the International Space Station.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The reality is that it signals that Republicans in the US Senate are not particularly interested in sending humans to Mars, probably are OK with the majority of cuts to science programs at NASA, and want to keep the status quo on Artemis, including the Space Launch System rocket.<\/p>\n<h2>Where things go from here<\/h2>\n<p>It is difficult to forecast where US space policy will go from here. The very public breakup between President Trump and SpaceX founder Elon Musk on Thursday significantly complicates the equation. At one point, Trump and Musk were both championing sending humans to Mars, but Musk is gone from the administration, and Trump may abandon that idea due to their rift.<\/p>\n<p>For what it\u2019s worth, a political appointee in NASA Communications said on Thursday that the president\u2019s vision for space\u2014Trump spoke of landing humans on Mars frequently during his campaign speeches\u2014will continue to be implemented.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNASA will continue to execute upon the President\u2019s vision for the future of space,\u201d NASA\u2019s press secretary, Bethany Stevens, said on X. \u201cWe will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President\u2019s objectives in space are met.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Congress, it seems, may be heading in a different direction.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Negotiations over the US federal budget for fiscal year 2026 are in the beginning stages, but when it comes to space, the fault lines are already solidifying in the Senate. The Trump White House released its budget request last Friday, and this included detailed information about its plans for NASA. On Thursday, just days later, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":42834,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[631,190,632,21],"class_list":["post-44201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-budget","tag-nasa","tag-senate","tag-space"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44201"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44201"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44201\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42834"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}