![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/dreamchasercollage.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
A closer look at Sierra Space\u2019s first Dream Chaser spaceplane designed to fly in orbit.<\/p>\n
Credit:
\n Stephen Clark\/Ars Technica<\/p>\n<\/figure>\n
Sierra Space says its Dream Chaser will provide its cargo a gentle ride back to Earth at no more than 1.5 Gs. This is useful for animal specimens and other sensitive payloads. Dream Chaser will also deliver payloads closer to the labs that analyze experiment results.<\/p>\n
,<\/p>\n
\u201cPlunging into the ocean is awful,\u201d Vice said. \u201cLanding on a runway is really nice.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dream Chaser is about a quarter of the size of a space shuttle orbiter, with roughly half of the shuttle\u2019s habitable volume. It\u2019s about 30 feet (9 meters) long, with a wingspan of 23 feet (7 meters). Those wings fold up, like the wings of a fighter jet on an aircraft carrier, to fit inside the payload envelope of its rocket. The first Dream Chaser missions will lift off on United Launch Alliance Vulcan rockets from Cape Canaveral, Florida, but Sierra Space says its spaceplane can fly on different launch vehicles.<\/p>\n
While the spaceplane itself is designed for a minimum of 15 flights, it features an add-on cargo module that is not reusable. This pressurized cargo pod, named \u201cShooting Star,\u201d has solar arrays that will unfurl in orbit to generate power. It\u2019s attached to the rear of Dream Chaser and will be the connecting point between the spaceplane and the International Space Station.<\/p>\n
All told, Dream Chaser can haul up to 12,000 pounds (5,500 kilograms) of cargo to the station. The spaceplane\u2019s return cargo capacity is about 4,000 pounds (1,850 kilograms), and the expendable Shooting Star cargo module, which will be jettisoned at the end of the mission to burn up in the atmosphere, can dispose of several tons of trash from the space station.<\/p>\n
Key tests still ahead<\/h2>\n
Dream Chaser\u2019s next stop after leaving Sierra Space\u2019s factory will be NASA\u2019s Neil Armstrong Test Facility in Ohio, formerly known as Plum Brook Station. The spacecraft will travel by road from Colorado, but Sierra Space is keeping its route and shipment date secret for security reasons. Wise said the spacecraft will stay at the Ohio test facility for one to three months, depending on how the testing goes.<\/p>\n
,<\/p>\n
The disposable cargo module for the first Dream Chaser flight to the space station has already departed Sierra Space\u2019s factory for Ohio. Once the Tenacity spaceplane arrives there, ground teams will connect the two segments of the Dream Chaser cargo freighter and run them through integrated tests. Those will include vibration and acoustic tests to check that the spacecraft can withstand the shaking and sound of a rocket launch. Sierra Space will also place the spacecraft inside a giant thermal vacuum chamber.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re going to take it down to vacuum and put it through the highs and lows of the temperature extremes it\u2019s going to see,\u201d Wise said.<\/p>\n
Then, if everything checks out, the spacecraft will ship out to NASA\u2019s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Sierra Space says the first Dream Chaser flight to the space station is currently slated for April, but there are risks to the schedule. The first flight of a new spacecraft is typically susceptible to delays, and Sierra Space is no stranger to this.<\/p>\n
Sierra Space will put its spaceplane on the second flight of United Launch Alliance\u2019s Vulcan rocket, which is still awaiting its first test flight. The Dream Chaser team will be watching closely as ULA launches its first Vulcan rocket, a mission now slated for December. The third schedule uncertainty, Wise said, is when the space station will have a port available to receive Dream Chaser.<\/p>\n Artist\u2019s illustration of Dream Chaser in orbit with its Shooting Star cargo module.<\/p>\n Credit: NASA engineers are reviewing Sierra Space data products, and government and contractor teams are performing joint tests to ensure it\u2019s safe for Dream Chaser to approach the space station, home to seven people. Wise said Sierra Space is in Phase 3 of NASA\u2019s three-part safety review process.<\/p>\n \u201cWe just finished up a major milestone where we and NASA looked at all the flight control products for both Dream Chaser and the ISS,\u201d Vice said. He told Ars he doesn\u2019t expect any hangups in NASA\u2019s reviews as Sierra Space closes in on launch.<\/p>\n ,<\/p>\n When it finally reaches orbit, Dream Chaser will go through several more technical gates before NASA gives the green light to approach the space station.<\/p>\n NASA wants to ensure the spacecraft can maintain control and respond to emergency commands from the space station crew. Assuming it meets those requirements, the spaceplane will fly underneath the station and approach tail-first from below, then halt a little more than 30 feet (10 meters) from the complex, close enough for the Canadian robotic arm to reach out, grapple it, and berth it an open port.<\/p>\n \u201cThere are going to be a series of challenges. We\u2019re a first flight of a new design of a spacecraft,\u201d said Jeff Davis, Sierra Space\u2019s lead flight director for the first Dream Chaser test flight. \u201cI have full confidence that United Launch Alliance will deliver us safely into a 200 nautical mile orbit, and then our spacecraft has to do its thing.\u201d<\/p>\n We have a whole series of demonstrations we have to do,\u201d Davis said. \u201cJust knowing that ISS has human beings onboard, and we\u2019re a big heavy spacecraft that\u2019s approaching them, is a lot of responsibility.\u201d<\/p>\n After a 45-day stay at the space station, Dream Chaser will head back to Earth, aiming to return to the old space shuttle landing strip in Florida. A prototype of the Dream Chaser already tested the spaceplane\u2019s autonomous approach and landing algorithms during a drop test over California in 2017.<\/p>\n Sierra Space and its parent company, Sierra Nevada, have pursued the Dream Chaser spaceplane concept for 15 years. Before that, the program originated in a commercial space startup called SpaceDev, which Sierra Nevada purchased in 2008. Going back further, Dream Chaser\u2019s shape is based on the HL-20 lifting body design developed by NASA\u2019s Langley Research Center more than 30 years ago.<\/p>\n ,<\/p>\n But that\u2019s not the whole story. Dream Chaser\u2019s origin can be traced to the Soviet Union, which launched a lifting body named BOR-4 into space several times in the early 1980s. This was a sub-scale model of a spaceplane the Soviets studied since the 1960s and a precursor to the Russian Buran space shuttle. After one of the BOR-4 test flights, an Australian military aircraft took photos of the spaceplane as it was recovered in the Indian Ocean. The Australians shared these images with US intelligence officials, who turned to NASA to help them understand what they were seeing.<\/p>\n NASA researchers used the pictures to reverse-engineer the BOR-4 as the basis for a concept called the HL-20. The HL-20 never flew, but NASA was briefly interested in it as an alternative to the space shuttle for crew transportation after the space shuttle Challenger accident. In 2006, SpaceDev licensed the HL-20 concept from NASA as the starting point for the commercial Dream Chaser.<\/p>\n Once Sierra Nevada took control of the program, after its acquisition of SpaceDev, the company proposed Dream Chaser for NASA\u2019s commercial crew program to fly astronauts to and from the space station. It was one of NASA\u2019s three finalists.<\/p>\n On October 24, Sierra Space moved the Shooting Star cargo module into position behind the Dream Chaser spaceplane for checkouts before shipment to Ohio for environmental testing.<\/p>\n Credit: In 2014, NASA selected Boeing and SpaceX and awarded each company multibillion-dollar contracts to finish developing their Starliner and Crew Dragon capsules. SpaceX has now launched 11 human spaceflight missions. Boeing\u2019s Starliner is languishing and still hasn\u2019t flown any astronauts.<\/p>\n Sierra Nevada revamped the Dream Chaser program as a cargo-only spacecraft, temporarily ditching the human-rated design. Gone were the cockpit, windows, and docking mechanism for Dream Chaser to link up with the space station on its own. The company saw another opportunity to win NASA support when the agency announced it would select a third contractor to deliver cargo to the space station, alongside incumbents SpaceX and Northrop Grumman, which started flying equipment to the orbiting outpost a decade ago.<\/p>\n ,<\/p>\n The bet paid off. In 2016, NASA selected Sierra Nevada to join SpaceX and Northrop Grumman on the agency\u2019s roster of cargo transportation providers. This was a huge win for Sierra Nevada, which has wealthy owners, but it was not equal to the fortune of Elon Musk or the investor base of a defense contractor like Northrop Grumman. It gave Sierra Nevada a sorely needed anchor customer.<\/p>\n NASA\u2019s fixed-price service contract covers seven Dream Chaser missions to resupply the space station and return cargo to Earth. The space agency hasn\u2019t released the exact value of the contract, citing the competitive nature of the commercial resupply program, but NASA procurement databases show the agency has obligated $1.2 billion to date to Sierra Space for the Dream Chaser cargo program. This doesn\u2019t include the more than $350 million NASA provided to Sierra Nevada years ago for the crew variant of Dream Chaser.<\/p>\n When NASA awarded Sierra Nevada the Dream Chaser cargo contract, the company targeted 2019 for the first flight to the space station. It\u2019s now five years late. Vice said one of the reasons for the delay was the COVID pandemic, which strained supply chains across the space industry. Parts came in and out of sequence, forcing managers to continually change the steps to put Dream Chaser together.<\/p>\n \u201cCOVID really slowed us down with the supply chain,\u201d he said. \u201cWe are now almost totally vertically integrated as a company so we don\u2019t have those kinds of challenges in the future.\u201d<\/p>\n Sierra Space builds its own thrusters, heat shield tiles, solar arrays, and the bulk of the spacecraft\u2019s wiring harnesses. \u201cWe really have thought about where there were bottlenecks, and we\u2019ve eliminated those bottlenecks by bringing the work in-house,\u201d Vice said. \u201cWhat we found almost immediately is we can move faster, make products much cheaper, and we don\u2019t have that risk.\u201d<\/p>\n ,<\/p>\n Vice singled out Dream Chaser\u2019s propulsion system as one of the program\u2019s major technical hurdles. The spacecraft has 26 small rocket engines, each capable of operating at three discrete levels of thrust for fine control or more significant orbit adjustments. Uniquely in the space industry, these thrusters consume a mix of kerosene and hydrogen peroxide propellants rather than toxic hypergolic propellants that ignite on contact with one another.<\/p>\n \u201cWe wanted to have a fuel system that was green instead of using hypergolics, so we could land it on a runway and we could walk up to the vehicle without being in hazmat suits,\u201d Vice said. \u201cThat was hard, I have to say.\u201d<\/p>\n Dream Chaser\u2019s wings are folded in this image, which shows elements of the spacecraft\u2019s propulsion system and pressurized cargo tunnel.<\/p>\n Credit: Dream Chaser is designed to fly in orbit for up to six months. A limiting factor in the spacecraft\u2019s operating life is its use of hydrogen peroxide propellant.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are now the world\u2019s experts on hydrogen peroxide, decomposition of hydrogen peroxide, contamination of systems, pumps, valves, lines,\u201d Vice said. Hydrogen peroxide is corrosive to many metals and is prone to decompose into water and oxygen.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are experts on zirconium,\u201d Vice added. Zirconium is resistant to the corrosive effects of hydrogen peroxide and is one of the few metals whose ions do not catalyze hydrogen peroxide\u2019s decomposition reaction, according to ATI, a producer of specialty metals.<\/p>\n \u201cThere was, it seemed like, an invention per week to make a green vehicle, but we did it,\u201d Vice said.<\/p>\n Going forward, Vice said he may decide to bring more supplier work under Sierra Space\u2019s roof. He\u2019s considering what to do about an agreement announced last year for Spirit AeroSystems to help Sierra Space produce Shooting Star cargo modules. \u201cWe continue to evaluate what we want to outsource and what we want to insource, and we\u2019ll see where that ultimately goes.\u201d<\/p>\n ,<\/p>\n Lockheed Martin is one supplier Sierra Space has counted on. The aerospace and defense juggernaut built the composite primary structure for Dream Chaser at the plant where it assembles F-35 fighter jets. Lockheed Martin has delivered a second bare Dream Chaser structure, which sits a few dozen feet away from the Tenacity spaceplane.<\/p>\n Once Tenacity is out the door, Sierra Space\u2019s technicians will start work on the second spacecraft\u2019s secondary structure and install tubing, harnesses, and avionics. It will take about two years to fully outfit the second cargo spaceplane, designated DC-102, and Sierra Space projects will cost half as much as the first one, according to Vice. That will handle the demand for at least 30 cargo missions, whether they go to the International Space Station or future commercial space stations or fly as standalone missions for private or government customers.<\/p>\n In the longer term, Sierra Space is studying how to make the Shooting Star cargo section recoverable and reusable. One idea, Vice said, is to add an inflatable heat shield to try to get the cargo module back to the ground intact.<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019re doing a series of tests on this technology,\u201d Vice said. \u201cWe\u2019ll start small. We\u2019ll be launching things up and bringing small stuff back, and we\u2019ll scale to (full) size and we\u2019ll see if it works. If it does, it\u2019s a complete game changer because even on (SpaceX\u2019s) Dragon, the trunk of Dragon gets burned up every time. We took a step back and said, \u2018Can we reuse the entire system?\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n The real dream, however, is to turn Dream Chaser into a transporter for people, a second version of the spaceplane that Sierra Space calls the DC-200.<\/p>\n ,<\/p>\n \u201cRight now, we\u2019re focused on getting a crew Dream Chaser ready in the \u201926 timeframe,\u201d Vice said. \u201cThere\u2019s still a lot of work to do on the DC-200, but we\u2019re still very focused on that.\u201d<\/p>\n The company\u2019s work on the crew version of Dream Chaser is coming out of its own private coffers. Sierra Space has raised $1.7 billion from private investors, primarily equity and venture capital funds, since spinning off from Sierra Nevada in 2021. The company reported a valuation of $5.3 billion last month, with $3.4 billion in \u201cactive contracts.\u201d<\/p>\n Vice said Sierra Space is \u201cheavy into the design phase\u201d of the human-rated Dream Chaser. \u201cRight now, the focus for us is how we really think about the abort system.\u201d<\/p>\n A crew-capable version of Dream Chaser would fly exposed to the aerodynamic airflow during launch, without the protection of a rocket\u2019s payload fairing. \u201cWe\u2019re trying to think very differently about how to do an abort system that\u2019s not like anything that\u2019s been done before, so it\u2019s not so expensive and time-consuming,\u201d Vice said. He declined to offer additional details about the launch abort system, which would be required to separate the spaceplane from a failing rocket.<\/p>\n While Dream Chaser is Sierra Space\u2019s most famous product, the company is also working on inflatable habitats that could be used to build future commercial space stations. Sierra Space has partnered with Blue Origin, Jeff Bezos\u2019s space company, on a space station concept known as Orbital Reef. This is one of several private space stations under study to follow the International Space Station, which is due for retirement in 2030.<\/p>\n But recent reports, including from Ars, have suggested that lead partner Blue Origin may be losing interest in a low-Earth orbit space station. CNBC reported last month that the Blue Origin-Sierra Space partnership was \u201con rocky footing.\u201d A report from Reuters said Blue Origin has reassigned personnel from the space station program.<\/p>\n Vice pushed back on those reports Monday: \u201cI think it was a lot in the press over nothing. I feel very good that we have a strong relationship with Blue Origin.\u201d<\/p>\n Whether Blue Origin keeps its interest in a space station or not, Sierra Space views a commercial platform in low-Earth orbit as central to the company\u2019s long-term strategy. It sounds like Vice is full steam ahead in this area.<\/p>\n \u201cThe real beauty of our approach at Sierra Space is we\u2019re building the entire platform going forward, a commercial platform,\u201d Vice said. \u201cSo we build both the transportation systems and the in-space destinations. Of course, Dream Chaser is going to provide cargo and crew to our commercial station. That\u2019s the way that we think about our strategy. Instead of relying on who else builds the follow-on to the ISS, it\u2019s us.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" LOUISVILLE, Colorado\u2014The first Dream Chaser spaceplane built to go into orbit is starting to look the part. Its foldable wings and fuselage are covered in custom-fitted ceramic tiles to shield the spacecraft\u2019s composite structure from the scorching heat of atmospheric reentry as it flies back to Earth. It has its landing gear, and technicians buzz […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":45777,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[970,717,190,971,3713],"class_list":["post-45776","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-dream-chaser","tag-international-space-station","tag-nasa","tag-sierra-space","tag-spaceplane"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45776"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45776"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45776\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/45777"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45776"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45776"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45776"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/dcart1.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n
\n Sierra Space<\/p>\n<\/figure>\nThe Dream Chaser story<\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/dcshootingstarmate.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n Shay Saldana\/Sierra Space<\/p>\n<\/figure>\n\u201cAn invention per week\u201d<\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cdn.arstechnica.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/dcaft.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n Stephen Clark\/Ars Technica<\/p>\n<\/figure>\nSierra\u2019s lofty ambitions<\/h2>\n