{"id":9827,"date":"2025-06-06T23:22:23","date_gmt":"2025-06-06T15:22:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp-productionenv-bjg9h2g2bgg5b8aa.southeastasia-01.azurewebsites.net\/news\/ispaces-resilience-lander-crash-lands-on-the-moon\/"},"modified":"2025-06-06T23:22:23","modified_gmt":"2025-06-06T15:22:23","slug":"ispaces-resilience-lander-crash-lands-on-the-moon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/news\/ispaces-resilience-lander-crash-lands-on-the-moon\/","title":{"rendered":"ispace\u2019s Resilience lander crash lands on the Moon"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"
The ispace Resilience lunar lander is pictured after it was integrated into the SpaceX Falcon 9 launch vehicle adapter about a week ahead of its launch on Jan. 15, 2025. Image: SpaceX via ispace<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In a horrible case of deja vu, Japan-based company ispace got to the finish line with its robotic lunar lander, but was unsuccessful in safely touching down on the Moon\u2019s surface.<\/p>\n

The landing attempt came about 4.5 months after the lander lifted off on a Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. It was part of a rideshare mission alongside the Blue Ghost lander from Firefly Aerospace.<\/p>\n

Mission teams in Japan made the call at about 8 a.m. JST (7 p.m. EDT, 2300 UTC) that due to the lack off communication from the lander, named Resilience, likely suffered what\u2019s referred to as a \u201chard landing.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cGiven that there is currently no prospect of a successful lunar landing, our top priority is to swiftly analyze the telemetry data we have obtained thus far and work diligently to identify the cause,\u201d said Takeshi Hakamada, Founder and CEO of ispace, in a statement Thursday evening. \u201cWe will strive to restore trust by providing a report of the findings to our shareholders, payload customers, HAKUTO-R partners, government officials, and all supporters of ispace.\u201d<\/p>\n

Up through the early phases of the landing event, the mission seemed to be going smoothly for ispace. Like its first mission, which launched in December 2022 and had a hard landing in 2023, the Mission 2 lander exhibited no issues following separation from the Falcon 9 rocket and through its lunar orbit insertion burn, which took place on May 6.<\/p>\n

Since then Resilience was gradually lowering the apogee or the furthest point in its orbit until it was circling the Moon at 100 km above the surface.<\/p>\n

Had the landing gone to plan, Resilience would\u2019ve moved through six phases, as laid out by ispace during its launch broadcast:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Phase<\/b><\/b><\/td>\nVelocity<\/b><\/b><\/td>\nAltitude <\/span><\/b><\/b><\/td>\nEstimated Time<\/b><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Phase 1<\/b><\/p>\n

De-Orbit Insertion (DOI)<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

5,800 km\/h<\/td>\n100 km<\/td>\nL-67 min >> L-66 min<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Phase 2<\/b><\/p>\n

Coast Descending<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

6,000 km\/h<\/td>\n100 km >> 20 km<\/td>\nL-66 min >> L-13 min<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Phase 3<\/b><\/p>\n

Braking Burn<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

6,000 km\/h >> 380 km\/h<\/td>\n20 km >> 3 km<\/td>\nL-13 min >> L-2 min<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Phase 4<\/b><\/p>\n

Braking Burn & Pitch-up<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

380 km\/h >> 120 km\/h<\/td>\n3 km >> 1 km<\/td>\nL-2 min >> L-1 min<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Phase 5<\/b><\/p>\n

Terminal Descent<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

120 km\/h >> 2 km\/h<\/td>\n1 km >> 10 m<\/td>\nL-1 min >> L-20 sec<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Phase 6<\/b><\/p>\n

Terminal Landing<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

2 km\/h >> 0 km\/h<\/td>\n10 m >> 0 m<\/td>\nL-20 sec >> L-0 sec<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

ispace said after the lander completed Phase 2 and reached about 20 km above the Moon\u2019s surface when it began firing its main engine at the start of the Phase 3 Braking Burn. However, as the lander came into a more vertical orientation telemetry was lost.<\/p>\n

\u201cBased on the currently available data, the Mission Control Center has been able to confirm the following: The laser rangefinder used to measure the distance to the lunar surface experienced delays in obtaining valid measurement values,\u201d ispace wrote in a statement following the landing attempt.<\/p>\n

\u201cAs a result, the lander was unable to decelerate sufficiently to reach the required speed for the planned lunar landing. Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"
Telemetry data from ispace\u2019s Resilience lunar lander was lost in the final minutes leading up to its planned touchdown time. Image: ispace via livestream<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The roughly 7.5-foot-tall lander carried with it a few science payloads from companies in Japan as well as a shoebox-sized rover from ispace-Europe, named Tenacious. Had the landing been successful, it would\u2019ve been the first European rover to operate on the Moon.<\/p>\n

Resilience was aiming for a soft landing in the northwestern part of the Earth-facing side of the Moon in a region known as Mare Frigoris, latin for the Sea of Cold. It\u2019s located about 60.5 degrees north and 4.6 degrees west.<\/p>\n

There were also some art installations on the lander, including a piece from Swedish artist, Mikael Genberg, which was a small model of a typical, red Swedish house. Weighing just about 3.5 ounces, it was going to be placed on the Moon\u2019s surface by the Tenacious rover and then imaged.<\/p>\n

During a prelaunch briefing, Genberg and his team discussed the importance of the project to them and how they hoped it could spark conversations and connections with the house on the Moon. Technical Lead Emil Vinterhav said it was difficult to imagine how a failed mission would feel after working towards this goal for 25 years.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor the last few days, I\u2019ve been trying to prepare myself for what happens if it doesn\u2019t go nominally because the entire focus has been on success all those years,\u201d Vinterhav said. \u201cWhen I search myself, I find it\u2019s going to be a very big feeling of emptiness, but at the same time, we will be on the Moon. We reached the Moon, maybe not exactly as we [planned], but it was never going to be exactly as we wanted it to be.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"
ispace\u2019s display on the exhibit floor of the 74th International Astronautical Congress in 2023. The backdrop shows the visual differences between the company\u2019s Series 1 and Series 2 landers. Image: ispace<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

ispace now also has some soul searching to do. This is the company second landing failure in its first two missions, despite applying lessons learned from its first landing attempt in 2023.<\/p>\n

Next up, it\u2019s American subsidiary, ispace-U.S., is on contract along with Draper with NASA to deliver a significantly larger lander, called Apex 1.0, to a region of the Moon on the far side called Schr\u00f6dinger Basin. The lander will also deploy a pair of relay satellites to help with communication during the mission.<\/p>\n

This is the first mission for ispace-U.S. and now carries the pressure of hopefully being the first successful landing for the company overall. That mission is set to launch in 2027, but as ispace Founder and CEO Takeshi Hakamada said Thursday night, they have a lot of work to do in finding the root cause of the Mission 2 failure first.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The ispace Resilience lunar lander is pictured after it was integrated into the SpaceX Falcon 9 launch vehicle adapter about a week ahead of its launch on Jan. 15, 2025. Image: SpaceX via ispace In a horrible case of deja vu, Japan-based company ispace got to the finish line with its robotic lunar lander, but […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1087,357,1088,625,1089],"class_list":["post-9827","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-hakuto-r-mission-2","tag-ispace","tag-ispace-u-s","tag-moon","tag-resilience"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9827"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9827"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9827\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9827"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9827"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starpath.global\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9827"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}